Cargando…

Recommended Best Practices for Lyophilization Validation 2021 Part II: Process Qualification and Continued Process Verification

This work describes the lyophilization process validation and consists of two parts. Part one (Part I: Process Design and Modeling) focuses on the process design and is described in the previous paper, while the current paper is devoted to process qualification and continued process verification. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jameel, Feroz, Alexeenko, Alina, Bhambhani, Akhilesh, Sacha, Gregory, Zhu, Tong, Tchessalov, Serguei, Sharma, Puneet, Moussa, Ehab, Iyer, Lavanya, Luthra, Sumit, Srinivasan, Jayasree, Tharp, Ted, Azzarella, Joseph, Kazarin, Petr, Jalal, Mehfouz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34750693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-021-02107-6
_version_ 1784595735910547456
author Jameel, Feroz
Alexeenko, Alina
Bhambhani, Akhilesh
Sacha, Gregory
Zhu, Tong
Tchessalov, Serguei
Sharma, Puneet
Moussa, Ehab
Iyer, Lavanya
Luthra, Sumit
Srinivasan, Jayasree
Tharp, Ted
Azzarella, Joseph
Kazarin, Petr
Jalal, Mehfouz
author_facet Jameel, Feroz
Alexeenko, Alina
Bhambhani, Akhilesh
Sacha, Gregory
Zhu, Tong
Tchessalov, Serguei
Sharma, Puneet
Moussa, Ehab
Iyer, Lavanya
Luthra, Sumit
Srinivasan, Jayasree
Tharp, Ted
Azzarella, Joseph
Kazarin, Petr
Jalal, Mehfouz
author_sort Jameel, Feroz
collection PubMed
description This work describes the lyophilization process validation and consists of two parts. Part one (Part I: Process Design and Modeling) focuses on the process design and is described in the previous paper, while the current paper is devoted to process qualification and continued process verification. The goal of the study is to show the cutting edge of lyophilization validation based on the integrated community-based opinion and the industrial perspective. This study presents best practices for batch size determination and includes the effect of batch size on drying time, process parameters selection strategies, and batch size overage to compensate for losses during production. It also includes sampling strategies to demonstrate batch uniformity as well as the use of statistical models to ensure adequate sampling. Based on the LyoHUB member organizations survey, the best practices in determining the number of PPQ runs are developed including the bracketing approach with minimum and maximum loads. Standard practice around CQA and CPP selection is outlined and shows the advantages of using control charts and run charts for process trending and quality control. The case studies demonstrating the validation strategy for monoclonal antibody and the impact of the loading process on the lyophilization cycle and product quality as well as the special case of lyophilization for dual-chamber cartridge system are chosen to illustrate the process validation. The standard practices in the validation of the lyophilization process, special lyophilization processes, and their impact on the validation strategy are discussed. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8575750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85757502021-11-15 Recommended Best Practices for Lyophilization Validation 2021 Part II: Process Qualification and Continued Process Verification Jameel, Feroz Alexeenko, Alina Bhambhani, Akhilesh Sacha, Gregory Zhu, Tong Tchessalov, Serguei Sharma, Puneet Moussa, Ehab Iyer, Lavanya Luthra, Sumit Srinivasan, Jayasree Tharp, Ted Azzarella, Joseph Kazarin, Petr Jalal, Mehfouz AAPS PharmSciTech Research Article This work describes the lyophilization process validation and consists of two parts. Part one (Part I: Process Design and Modeling) focuses on the process design and is described in the previous paper, while the current paper is devoted to process qualification and continued process verification. The goal of the study is to show the cutting edge of lyophilization validation based on the integrated community-based opinion and the industrial perspective. This study presents best practices for batch size determination and includes the effect of batch size on drying time, process parameters selection strategies, and batch size overage to compensate for losses during production. It also includes sampling strategies to demonstrate batch uniformity as well as the use of statistical models to ensure adequate sampling. Based on the LyoHUB member organizations survey, the best practices in determining the number of PPQ runs are developed including the bracketing approach with minimum and maximum loads. Standard practice around CQA and CPP selection is outlined and shows the advantages of using control charts and run charts for process trending and quality control. The case studies demonstrating the validation strategy for monoclonal antibody and the impact of the loading process on the lyophilization cycle and product quality as well as the special case of lyophilization for dual-chamber cartridge system are chosen to illustrate the process validation. The standard practices in the validation of the lyophilization process, special lyophilization processes, and their impact on the validation strategy are discussed. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] Springer International Publishing 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8575750/ /pubmed/34750693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-021-02107-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Jameel, Feroz
Alexeenko, Alina
Bhambhani, Akhilesh
Sacha, Gregory
Zhu, Tong
Tchessalov, Serguei
Sharma, Puneet
Moussa, Ehab
Iyer, Lavanya
Luthra, Sumit
Srinivasan, Jayasree
Tharp, Ted
Azzarella, Joseph
Kazarin, Petr
Jalal, Mehfouz
Recommended Best Practices for Lyophilization Validation 2021 Part II: Process Qualification and Continued Process Verification
title Recommended Best Practices for Lyophilization Validation 2021 Part II: Process Qualification and Continued Process Verification
title_full Recommended Best Practices for Lyophilization Validation 2021 Part II: Process Qualification and Continued Process Verification
title_fullStr Recommended Best Practices for Lyophilization Validation 2021 Part II: Process Qualification and Continued Process Verification
title_full_unstemmed Recommended Best Practices for Lyophilization Validation 2021 Part II: Process Qualification and Continued Process Verification
title_short Recommended Best Practices for Lyophilization Validation 2021 Part II: Process Qualification and Continued Process Verification
title_sort recommended best practices for lyophilization validation 2021 part ii: process qualification and continued process verification
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34750693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-021-02107-6
work_keys_str_mv AT jameelferoz recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT alexeenkoalina recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT bhambhaniakhilesh recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT sachagregory recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT zhutong recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT tchessalovserguei recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT sharmapuneet recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT moussaehab recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT iyerlavanya recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT luthrasumit recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT srinivasanjayasree recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT tharpted recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT azzarellajoseph recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT kazarinpetr recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification
AT jalalmehfouz recommendedbestpracticesforlyophilizationvalidation2021partiiprocessqualificationandcontinuedprocessverification