Cargando…

Quality Improvement of Sample Collection Increases the Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study

Objective: The diagnostic efficiency of the quantitative fecal immunochemical test (qFIT) has large variations in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to explore whether the practical sample collection operant training could improve the diagnostic accuracy of the qFIT in CRC screening. Method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Ru-chen, Wang, Pei-zhu, Li, Yue-yue, Zhang, Yan, Ma, Ming-jun, Meng, Fan-yi, Liu, Chao, Yang, Xiao-yun, Lv, Ming, Zuo, Xiu-li, Li, Yan-qing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.762560
_version_ 1784595737587220480
author Zhou, Ru-chen
Wang, Pei-zhu
Li, Yue-yue
Zhang, Yan
Ma, Ming-jun
Meng, Fan-yi
Liu, Chao
Yang, Xiao-yun
Lv, Ming
Zuo, Xiu-li
Li, Yan-qing
author_facet Zhou, Ru-chen
Wang, Pei-zhu
Li, Yue-yue
Zhang, Yan
Ma, Ming-jun
Meng, Fan-yi
Liu, Chao
Yang, Xiao-yun
Lv, Ming
Zuo, Xiu-li
Li, Yan-qing
author_sort Zhou, Ru-chen
collection PubMed
description Objective: The diagnostic efficiency of the quantitative fecal immunochemical test (qFIT) has large variations in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to explore whether the practical sample collection operant training could improve the diagnostic accuracy of the qFIT in CRC screening. Methods: Moderate-/high-risk individuals aged 50–75 years old were invited to participate in a prospective observational study between July 2020 and March 2021. Participants took a qFIT sample without fecal sample collection operant training in advance and then completed another qFIT sample after the operant training. The primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of the qFITs for CRC and advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN). The secondary outcome was the difference in the area under the curves (AUCs) and the concentrations of the fecal hemoglobin (Hb) between the qFIT without and after the operant training. Results: Out of 913 patients, 81 (8.9%) patients had ACRN, including 25 (2.7%) patients with CRC. For CRC, the sensitivities of the qFIT without and after the operant training at 10 μg/g were 80.4 and 100.0%, respectively, and the specificities were 90.1 and 88.4%, respectively. For ACRN, the sensitivities were 49.4 and 69.1% and the specificities were 91.7 and 91.3%, respectively. The AUC of the qFIT after the operant training was significantly higher than that without the operant training for CRC (p = 0.027) and ACRN (p = 0.001). After the operant training, the concentration of the fecal Hb was significantly higher than that without the operant training (p = 0.009) for ACRN, but there was no significant difference for CRC (p = 0.367). Conclusion: Practical sample collection operant training improves the diagnostic accuracy of the qFIT, which increases the detection of the low concentrations of fecal Hb. Improving the quality of the sample collection could contribute to the diagnostic efficiency of the qFIT in CRC screening.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8575757
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85757572021-11-10 Quality Improvement of Sample Collection Increases the Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study Zhou, Ru-chen Wang, Pei-zhu Li, Yue-yue Zhang, Yan Ma, Ming-jun Meng, Fan-yi Liu, Chao Yang, Xiao-yun Lv, Ming Zuo, Xiu-li Li, Yan-qing Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Objective: The diagnostic efficiency of the quantitative fecal immunochemical test (qFIT) has large variations in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to explore whether the practical sample collection operant training could improve the diagnostic accuracy of the qFIT in CRC screening. Methods: Moderate-/high-risk individuals aged 50–75 years old were invited to participate in a prospective observational study between July 2020 and March 2021. Participants took a qFIT sample without fecal sample collection operant training in advance and then completed another qFIT sample after the operant training. The primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of the qFITs for CRC and advanced colorectal neoplasia (ACRN). The secondary outcome was the difference in the area under the curves (AUCs) and the concentrations of the fecal hemoglobin (Hb) between the qFIT without and after the operant training. Results: Out of 913 patients, 81 (8.9%) patients had ACRN, including 25 (2.7%) patients with CRC. For CRC, the sensitivities of the qFIT without and after the operant training at 10 μg/g were 80.4 and 100.0%, respectively, and the specificities were 90.1 and 88.4%, respectively. For ACRN, the sensitivities were 49.4 and 69.1% and the specificities were 91.7 and 91.3%, respectively. The AUC of the qFIT after the operant training was significantly higher than that without the operant training for CRC (p = 0.027) and ACRN (p = 0.001). After the operant training, the concentration of the fecal Hb was significantly higher than that without the operant training (p = 0.009) for ACRN, but there was no significant difference for CRC (p = 0.367). Conclusion: Practical sample collection operant training improves the diagnostic accuracy of the qFIT, which increases the detection of the low concentrations of fecal Hb. Improving the quality of the sample collection could contribute to the diagnostic efficiency of the qFIT in CRC screening. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8575757/ /pubmed/34765625 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.762560 Text en Copyright © 2021 Zhou, Wang, Li, Zhang, Ma, Meng, Liu, Yang, Lv, Zuo and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Zhou, Ru-chen
Wang, Pei-zhu
Li, Yue-yue
Zhang, Yan
Ma, Ming-jun
Meng, Fan-yi
Liu, Chao
Yang, Xiao-yun
Lv, Ming
Zuo, Xiu-li
Li, Yan-qing
Quality Improvement of Sample Collection Increases the Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study
title Quality Improvement of Sample Collection Increases the Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study
title_full Quality Improvement of Sample Collection Increases the Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Quality Improvement of Sample Collection Increases the Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Quality Improvement of Sample Collection Increases the Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study
title_short Quality Improvement of Sample Collection Increases the Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study
title_sort quality improvement of sample collection increases the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: a pilot study
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575757/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765625
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.762560
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouruchen qualityimprovementofsamplecollectionincreasesthediagnosticaccuracyofquantitativefecalimmunochemicaltestincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudy
AT wangpeizhu qualityimprovementofsamplecollectionincreasesthediagnosticaccuracyofquantitativefecalimmunochemicaltestincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudy
AT liyueyue qualityimprovementofsamplecollectionincreasesthediagnosticaccuracyofquantitativefecalimmunochemicaltestincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudy
AT zhangyan qualityimprovementofsamplecollectionincreasesthediagnosticaccuracyofquantitativefecalimmunochemicaltestincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudy
AT mamingjun qualityimprovementofsamplecollectionincreasesthediagnosticaccuracyofquantitativefecalimmunochemicaltestincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudy
AT mengfanyi qualityimprovementofsamplecollectionincreasesthediagnosticaccuracyofquantitativefecalimmunochemicaltestincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudy
AT liuchao qualityimprovementofsamplecollectionincreasesthediagnosticaccuracyofquantitativefecalimmunochemicaltestincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudy
AT yangxiaoyun qualityimprovementofsamplecollectionincreasesthediagnosticaccuracyofquantitativefecalimmunochemicaltestincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudy
AT lvming qualityimprovementofsamplecollectionincreasesthediagnosticaccuracyofquantitativefecalimmunochemicaltestincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudy
AT zuoxiuli qualityimprovementofsamplecollectionincreasesthediagnosticaccuracyofquantitativefecalimmunochemicaltestincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudy
AT liyanqing qualityimprovementofsamplecollectionincreasesthediagnosticaccuracyofquantitativefecalimmunochemicaltestincolorectalcancerscreeningapilotstudy