Cargando…
Is sleeve lobectomy safe after induction therapy?—a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Sleeve lobectomy (SL) is a lung-sparing procedure, which is accepted as a valid operation for centrally-located advanced tumors. These tumors often require induction treatment by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy to downstage the disease and thus facilitate subsequent surgery. However, in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795937 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-939 |
_version_ | 1784595750048497664 |
---|---|
author | Chriqui, Louis-Emmanuel Forster, Céline Lovis, Alban Bouchaab, Hasna Krueger, Thorsten Perentes, Jean Yannis Gonzalez, Michel |
author_facet | Chriqui, Louis-Emmanuel Forster, Céline Lovis, Alban Bouchaab, Hasna Krueger, Thorsten Perentes, Jean Yannis Gonzalez, Michel |
author_sort | Chriqui, Louis-Emmanuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sleeve lobectomy (SL) is a lung-sparing procedure, which is accepted as a valid operation for centrally-located advanced tumors. These tumors often require induction treatment by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy to downstage the disease and thus facilitate subsequent surgery. However, induction therapy may potentially increase the risk of bronchial anastomotic complications and related morbidity. This meta-analysis aims to determine the impact of induction therapy on the outcomes of pulmonary SL. METHODS: We compared studies of patients undergoing SL or bilobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with and without induction therapy. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, morbidity, anastomosis complication and 5-year survival. Odds ratio (OR) were computed following the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Ten studies were included for a total of 1,204 patients. There was no statistical difference for between patients who underwent induction therapy followed by surgery and patients who underwent surgery alone in term of post-operative mortality (OR: 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76–4.25, P value =0.19) and morbidity (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.90–1.52, P value =0.237). Anastomosis related complications rate were 5.2% and appears increased after induction therapy with a statistical difference close to the significance (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 0.97–2.83, P value =0.06). Patients undergoing surgery alone showed better survival at 5 years (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.15–2.00, P value =0.003). CONCLUSIONS: SL following induction therapy can be safely performed with no increase of mortality and morbidity. However, the need for induction therapy before surgery is associated with increased anastomotic complications and poorer survival prognosis at 5 years. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8575812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85758122021-11-17 Is sleeve lobectomy safe after induction therapy?—a systematic review and meta-analysis Chriqui, Louis-Emmanuel Forster, Céline Lovis, Alban Bouchaab, Hasna Krueger, Thorsten Perentes, Jean Yannis Gonzalez, Michel J Thorac Dis Original Article BACKGROUND: Sleeve lobectomy (SL) is a lung-sparing procedure, which is accepted as a valid operation for centrally-located advanced tumors. These tumors often require induction treatment by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy to downstage the disease and thus facilitate subsequent surgery. However, induction therapy may potentially increase the risk of bronchial anastomotic complications and related morbidity. This meta-analysis aims to determine the impact of induction therapy on the outcomes of pulmonary SL. METHODS: We compared studies of patients undergoing SL or bilobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with and without induction therapy. Outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, morbidity, anastomosis complication and 5-year survival. Odds ratio (OR) were computed following the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Ten studies were included for a total of 1,204 patients. There was no statistical difference for between patients who underwent induction therapy followed by surgery and patients who underwent surgery alone in term of post-operative mortality (OR: 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76–4.25, P value =0.19) and morbidity (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.90–1.52, P value =0.237). Anastomosis related complications rate were 5.2% and appears increased after induction therapy with a statistical difference close to the significance (OR: 1.65, 95% CI: 0.97–2.83, P value =0.06). Patients undergoing surgery alone showed better survival at 5 years (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.15–2.00, P value =0.003). CONCLUSIONS: SL following induction therapy can be safely performed with no increase of mortality and morbidity. However, the need for induction therapy before surgery is associated with increased anastomotic complications and poorer survival prognosis at 5 years. AME Publishing Company 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8575812/ /pubmed/34795937 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-939 Text en 2021 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chriqui, Louis-Emmanuel Forster, Céline Lovis, Alban Bouchaab, Hasna Krueger, Thorsten Perentes, Jean Yannis Gonzalez, Michel Is sleeve lobectomy safe after induction therapy?—a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Is sleeve lobectomy safe after induction therapy?—a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Is sleeve lobectomy safe after induction therapy?—a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Is sleeve lobectomy safe after induction therapy?—a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Is sleeve lobectomy safe after induction therapy?—a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Is sleeve lobectomy safe after induction therapy?—a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | is sleeve lobectomy safe after induction therapy?—a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795937 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-939 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chriquilouisemmanuel issleevelobectomysafeafterinductiontherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT forsterceline issleevelobectomysafeafterinductiontherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lovisalban issleevelobectomysafeafterinductiontherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bouchaabhasna issleevelobectomysafeafterinductiontherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT kruegerthorsten issleevelobectomysafeafterinductiontherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT perentesjeanyannis issleevelobectomysafeafterinductiontherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gonzalezmichel issleevelobectomysafeafterinductiontherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |