Emerging roles of left ventricular assist device therapy as bridge to transplant in an Asian city with scarce heart transplant donor

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been increasingly used in patients with advanced heart failure. This study aimed to assess the impact of implementation of LVAD therapy on heart transplantation (HTx) service in Hong Kong (HK). METHODS: LVAD program was started in 2010 in HK and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wong, Ka-Lam, Ho, Ka Lai Cally, Lee, Oswald Joseph, Lun, Kin Shing, Bhatia, Inderjeet, Tam, Wai Ying Eva, Fan, Yue Yan Katherine, Au, Wing Kuk Timmy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8575832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34795921
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-21-298
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been increasingly used in patients with advanced heart failure. This study aimed to assess the impact of implementation of LVAD therapy on heart transplantation (HTx) service in Hong Kong (HK). METHODS: LVAD program was started in 2010 in HK and patients who had been put on HTx waiting list since the start of HTx program in HK from 1992 to 2020 were included for analysis. Survival on HTx waiting list between pre-LVAD era 1992–2009 and post-LVAD era 2010–2020 were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Multivariate analysis by time-dependent Cox-proportional hazard model was used to identify independent predictors of HTx waiting list mortality. RESULTS: A total of 478 heart transplant listing episodes involving 457 patients were included for analysis. There were 232 heart transplantations (HTxs), including one re-transplantation, during the study period. There were 110 patients who received LVAD as bridge to transplantation (BTT) and 30 of them had undergone subsequent HTx. The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival on waiting list were 82.3%, 61.7% and 43.0% respectively in the pre-LVAD era (n=178), while the 1-, 2- and 3-year survival were significantly improved at 85.7%, 81.8% and 78% respectively in the post-LVAD era (n=300), (P=0.003). Time-dependent multivariate analysis revealed that LVAD support was independently associated with significant reduction of waiting list mortality [odds ratio (OR): 0.21; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10–0.44, P<0.001]. There was no significant difference when comparing survival after LVAD as BTT and survival after HTx up to 8 years (76.1% vs. 72% at 8 years respectively, P=0.732). CONCLUSIONS: Waiting list survival improved in the post-LVAD era driven by the implementation of LVAD service. Long-term survival for LVAD recipients as BTT were comparable to heart transplant recipients in HK.

Ejemplares similares