Cargando…

Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Various enhanced patient instructions (EPIs) have been used for bowel preparation (BP) and our previous meta-analysis also demonstrated the efficacy of EPIs in increasing the colonic polyp and adenoma detection rates; however, the optimal method for adequate BP has not yet been developed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Xu, Yi, Li-Juan, Han, Yang, Chen, Hui, Liu, Xiao-Ling, Chen, Wei-Qing, Jiménez-Herrera, Maria F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34694227
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19915
_version_ 1784595901501669376
author Tian, Xu
Yi, Li-Juan
Han, Yang
Chen, Hui
Liu, Xiao-Ling
Chen, Wei-Qing
Jiménez-Herrera, Maria F
author_facet Tian, Xu
Yi, Li-Juan
Han, Yang
Chen, Hui
Liu, Xiao-Ling
Chen, Wei-Qing
Jiménez-Herrera, Maria F
author_sort Tian, Xu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Various enhanced patient instructions (EPIs) have been used for bowel preparation (BP) and our previous meta-analysis also demonstrated the efficacy of EPIs in increasing the colonic polyp and adenoma detection rates; however, the optimal method for adequate BP has not yet been developed. OBJECTIVE: We performed a network meta-analysis to determine the optimal instructions. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of EPIs with each other or standard patient instructions (SPIs) for BP. We performed direct and Bayesian network meta-analyses for all instructions and used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria to appraise the quality of evidence. RESULTS: We included 23 RCTs (7969 patients) comparing 10 different instructions. In direct meta-analyses, most of the EPIs, except visual aids and mobile apps, increased the adequate preparation rate (APR). Network meta-analyses showed that additional explanations were superior to visual aids (odds ratio [OR] 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.59), telephone calls (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.37-0.99), educational videos (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.5-0.77), and mobile apps (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.68) with low-to-high-quality evidence; newly designed booklets (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.59-6.16), SMS text messaging (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.28-3.91), telephone calls (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.03-1.78), educational videos (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.40-3.65), and social media applications (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.4-3.93) were superior to visual aids and mobile apps with low-to-high-quality evidence. SMS text messaging, telephone calls, and social media applications increase adherence to and satisfaction with the BP regime. Social media applications reduce the risk of adverse events (AEs). Telephone calls and social media applications increase the polyp detection rate (PDR). CONCLUSIONS: Newly designed booklets, telephone calls, educational videos, and social media applications can improve the quality of BP. Telephone calls and social media applications improve adherence to and satisfaction with the BP regime, reduce the risk of AEs, and increase the PDR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: INPLASY (International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols) INPLASY2020120103; https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2020-12-0103/
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8576559
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85765592021-11-24 Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials Tian, Xu Yi, Li-Juan Han, Yang Chen, Hui Liu, Xiao-Ling Chen, Wei-Qing Jiménez-Herrera, Maria F J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Various enhanced patient instructions (EPIs) have been used for bowel preparation (BP) and our previous meta-analysis also demonstrated the efficacy of EPIs in increasing the colonic polyp and adenoma detection rates; however, the optimal method for adequate BP has not yet been developed. OBJECTIVE: We performed a network meta-analysis to determine the optimal instructions. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness of EPIs with each other or standard patient instructions (SPIs) for BP. We performed direct and Bayesian network meta-analyses for all instructions and used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria to appraise the quality of evidence. RESULTS: We included 23 RCTs (7969 patients) comparing 10 different instructions. In direct meta-analyses, most of the EPIs, except visual aids and mobile apps, increased the adequate preparation rate (APR). Network meta-analyses showed that additional explanations were superior to visual aids (odds ratio [OR] 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.59), telephone calls (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.37-0.99), educational videos (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.5-0.77), and mobile apps (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.68) with low-to-high-quality evidence; newly designed booklets (OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.59-6.16), SMS text messaging (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.28-3.91), telephone calls (OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.03-1.78), educational videos (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.40-3.65), and social media applications (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.4-3.93) were superior to visual aids and mobile apps with low-to-high-quality evidence. SMS text messaging, telephone calls, and social media applications increase adherence to and satisfaction with the BP regime. Social media applications reduce the risk of adverse events (AEs). Telephone calls and social media applications increase the polyp detection rate (PDR). CONCLUSIONS: Newly designed booklets, telephone calls, educational videos, and social media applications can improve the quality of BP. Telephone calls and social media applications improve adherence to and satisfaction with the BP regime, reduce the risk of AEs, and increase the PDR. TRIAL REGISTRATION: INPLASY (International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols) INPLASY2020120103; https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2020-12-0103/ JMIR Publications 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8576559/ /pubmed/34694227 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19915 Text en ©Xu Tian, Li-Juan Yi, Yang Han, Hui Chen, Xiao-Ling Liu, Wei-Qing Chen, Maria F Jiménez-Herrera. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 25.10.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Tian, Xu
Yi, Li-Juan
Han, Yang
Chen, Hui
Liu, Xiao-Ling
Chen, Wei-Qing
Jiménez-Herrera, Maria F
Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials
title Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short Comparative Effectiveness of Enhanced Patient Instructions for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Network Meta-analysis of 23 Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort comparative effectiveness of enhanced patient instructions for bowel preparation before colonoscopy: network meta-analysis of 23 randomized controlled trials
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576559/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34694227
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19915
work_keys_str_mv AT tianxu comparativeeffectivenessofenhancedpatientinstructionsforbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopynetworkmetaanalysisof23randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yilijuan comparativeeffectivenessofenhancedpatientinstructionsforbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopynetworkmetaanalysisof23randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT hanyang comparativeeffectivenessofenhancedpatientinstructionsforbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopynetworkmetaanalysisof23randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenhui comparativeeffectivenessofenhancedpatientinstructionsforbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopynetworkmetaanalysisof23randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liuxiaoling comparativeeffectivenessofenhancedpatientinstructionsforbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopynetworkmetaanalysisof23randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenweiqing comparativeeffectivenessofenhancedpatientinstructionsforbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopynetworkmetaanalysisof23randomizedcontrolledtrials
AT jimenezherreramariaf comparativeeffectivenessofenhancedpatientinstructionsforbowelpreparationbeforecolonoscopynetworkmetaanalysisof23randomizedcontrolledtrials