Cargando…

Patient-Reported Factors Associated With Older Adults’ Cancer Screening Decision-making: A Systematic Review

IMPORTANCE: Decisions for older adults (aged ≥65 years) and their clinicians about whether to continue to screen for cancer are not easy. Many older adults who are frail or have limited life expectancy or comorbidities continue to be screened for cancer despite guidelines suggesting they should not;...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Jenna, Dodd, Rachael H., Gainey, Karen M., Naganathan, Vasi, Cvejic, Erin, Jansen, Jesse, McCaffery, Kirsten J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34748004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33406
_version_ 1784595906778103808
author Smith, Jenna
Dodd, Rachael H.
Gainey, Karen M.
Naganathan, Vasi
Cvejic, Erin
Jansen, Jesse
McCaffery, Kirsten J.
author_facet Smith, Jenna
Dodd, Rachael H.
Gainey, Karen M.
Naganathan, Vasi
Cvejic, Erin
Jansen, Jesse
McCaffery, Kirsten J.
author_sort Smith, Jenna
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Decisions for older adults (aged ≥65 years) and their clinicians about whether to continue to screen for cancer are not easy. Many older adults who are frail or have limited life expectancy or comorbidities continue to be screened for cancer despite guidelines suggesting they should not; furthermore, many older adults have limited knowledge of the potential harms of continuing to be screened. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the patient-reported factors associated with older adults’ decisions regarding screening for breast, prostate, colorectal, and cervical cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Studies were identified by searching databases from January 2000 to June 2020 and were independently assessed for inclusion by 2 authors. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently conducted by 2 authors, and then all decisions were cross-checked and discussed where necessary. Data analysis was performed from September to December 2020. FINDINGS: The search yielded 2475 records, of which 21 unique studies were included. Nine studies were quantitative, 8 were qualitative, and 4 used mixed method designs. Of the 21 studies, 17 were conducted in the US, and 10 of 21 assessed breast cancer screening decisions only. Factors associated with decision-making were synthesized into 5 categories: demographic, health and clinical, psychological, physician, and social and system. Commonly identified factors associated with the decision to undergo screening included personal or family history of cancer, positive screening attitudes, routine or habit, to gain knowledge, friends, and a physician’s recommendation. Factors associated with the decision to forgo screening included being older, negative screening attitudes, and desire not to know about cancer. Some factors had varying associations, including insurance coverage, living in a nursing home, prior screening experience, health problems, limited life expectancy, perceived cancer risk, risks of screening, family, and a physician’s recommendation to stop. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although guidelines suggest incorporating life expectancy and health status to inform older adults’ cancer screening decisions, older adults’ ingrained beliefs about screening may run counter to these concepts. Communication strategies are needed that support older adults to make informed cancer screening decisions by addressing underlying screening beliefs in context with their perceived and actual risk of developing cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8576581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85765812021-11-23 Patient-Reported Factors Associated With Older Adults’ Cancer Screening Decision-making: A Systematic Review Smith, Jenna Dodd, Rachael H. Gainey, Karen M. Naganathan, Vasi Cvejic, Erin Jansen, Jesse McCaffery, Kirsten J. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Decisions for older adults (aged ≥65 years) and their clinicians about whether to continue to screen for cancer are not easy. Many older adults who are frail or have limited life expectancy or comorbidities continue to be screened for cancer despite guidelines suggesting they should not; furthermore, many older adults have limited knowledge of the potential harms of continuing to be screened. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the patient-reported factors associated with older adults’ decisions regarding screening for breast, prostate, colorectal, and cervical cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW: Studies were identified by searching databases from January 2000 to June 2020 and were independently assessed for inclusion by 2 authors. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were independently conducted by 2 authors, and then all decisions were cross-checked and discussed where necessary. Data analysis was performed from September to December 2020. FINDINGS: The search yielded 2475 records, of which 21 unique studies were included. Nine studies were quantitative, 8 were qualitative, and 4 used mixed method designs. Of the 21 studies, 17 were conducted in the US, and 10 of 21 assessed breast cancer screening decisions only. Factors associated with decision-making were synthesized into 5 categories: demographic, health and clinical, psychological, physician, and social and system. Commonly identified factors associated with the decision to undergo screening included personal or family history of cancer, positive screening attitudes, routine or habit, to gain knowledge, friends, and a physician’s recommendation. Factors associated with the decision to forgo screening included being older, negative screening attitudes, and desire not to know about cancer. Some factors had varying associations, including insurance coverage, living in a nursing home, prior screening experience, health problems, limited life expectancy, perceived cancer risk, risks of screening, family, and a physician’s recommendation to stop. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Although guidelines suggest incorporating life expectancy and health status to inform older adults’ cancer screening decisions, older adults’ ingrained beliefs about screening may run counter to these concepts. Communication strategies are needed that support older adults to make informed cancer screening decisions by addressing underlying screening beliefs in context with their perceived and actual risk of developing cancer. American Medical Association 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8576581/ /pubmed/34748004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33406 Text en Copyright 2021 Smith J et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Smith, Jenna
Dodd, Rachael H.
Gainey, Karen M.
Naganathan, Vasi
Cvejic, Erin
Jansen, Jesse
McCaffery, Kirsten J.
Patient-Reported Factors Associated With Older Adults’ Cancer Screening Decision-making: A Systematic Review
title Patient-Reported Factors Associated With Older Adults’ Cancer Screening Decision-making: A Systematic Review
title_full Patient-Reported Factors Associated With Older Adults’ Cancer Screening Decision-making: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Patient-Reported Factors Associated With Older Adults’ Cancer Screening Decision-making: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Reported Factors Associated With Older Adults’ Cancer Screening Decision-making: A Systematic Review
title_short Patient-Reported Factors Associated With Older Adults’ Cancer Screening Decision-making: A Systematic Review
title_sort patient-reported factors associated with older adults’ cancer screening decision-making: a systematic review
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34748004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33406
work_keys_str_mv AT smithjenna patientreportedfactorsassociatedwitholderadultscancerscreeningdecisionmakingasystematicreview
AT doddrachaelh patientreportedfactorsassociatedwitholderadultscancerscreeningdecisionmakingasystematicreview
AT gaineykarenm patientreportedfactorsassociatedwitholderadultscancerscreeningdecisionmakingasystematicreview
AT naganathanvasi patientreportedfactorsassociatedwitholderadultscancerscreeningdecisionmakingasystematicreview
AT cvejicerin patientreportedfactorsassociatedwitholderadultscancerscreeningdecisionmakingasystematicreview
AT jansenjesse patientreportedfactorsassociatedwitholderadultscancerscreeningdecisionmakingasystematicreview
AT mccafferykirstenj patientreportedfactorsassociatedwitholderadultscancerscreeningdecisionmakingasystematicreview