Cargando…
Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion
IMPORTANCE: Advanced imaging for patient selection in mechanical thrombectomy is not widely available. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients selected for mechanical thrombectomy by noncontrast computed tomography (CT) vs those selected by computed tomography perfusion (CTP) or magn...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Medical Association
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34747975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4082 |
_version_ | 1784595915666882560 |
---|---|
author | Nguyen, Thanh N. Abdalkader, Mohamad Nagel, Simon Qureshi, Muhammad M. Ribo, Marc Caparros, Francois Haussen, Diogo C. Mohammaden, Mahmoud H. Sheth, Sunil A. Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago Siegler, James E. Zaidi, Syed Olive-Gadea, Marta Henon, Hilde Möhlenbruch, Markus A. Castonguay, Alicia C. Nannoni, Stefania Kaesmacher, Johannes Puri, Ajit S. Seker, Fatih Farooqui, Mudassir Salazar-Marioni, Sergio Kuhn, Anna L. Kaliaev, Artem Farzin, Behzad Boisseau, William Masoud, Hesham E. Lopez, Carlos Ynigo Rana, Ameena Kareem, Samer Abdul Sathya, Anvitha Klein, Piers Kassem, Mohammad W. Ringleb, Peter A. Cordonnier, Charlotte Gralla, Jan Fischer, Urs Michel, Patrik Jovin, Tudor G. Raymond, Jean Zaidat, Osama O. Nogueira, Raul G. |
author_facet | Nguyen, Thanh N. Abdalkader, Mohamad Nagel, Simon Qureshi, Muhammad M. Ribo, Marc Caparros, Francois Haussen, Diogo C. Mohammaden, Mahmoud H. Sheth, Sunil A. Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago Siegler, James E. Zaidi, Syed Olive-Gadea, Marta Henon, Hilde Möhlenbruch, Markus A. Castonguay, Alicia C. Nannoni, Stefania Kaesmacher, Johannes Puri, Ajit S. Seker, Fatih Farooqui, Mudassir Salazar-Marioni, Sergio Kuhn, Anna L. Kaliaev, Artem Farzin, Behzad Boisseau, William Masoud, Hesham E. Lopez, Carlos Ynigo Rana, Ameena Kareem, Samer Abdul Sathya, Anvitha Klein, Piers Kassem, Mohammad W. Ringleb, Peter A. Cordonnier, Charlotte Gralla, Jan Fischer, Urs Michel, Patrik Jovin, Tudor G. Raymond, Jean Zaidat, Osama O. Nogueira, Raul G. |
author_sort | Nguyen, Thanh N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | IMPORTANCE: Advanced imaging for patient selection in mechanical thrombectomy is not widely available. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients selected for mechanical thrombectomy by noncontrast computed tomography (CT) vs those selected by computed tomography perfusion (CTP) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the extended time window. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multinational cohort study included consecutive patients with proximal anterior circulation occlusion stroke presenting within 6 to 24 hours of time last seen well from January 2014 to December 2020. This study was conducted at 15 sites across 5 countries in Europe and North America. The duration of follow-up was 90 days from stroke onset. EXPOSURES: Computed tomography with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, CTP, or MRI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days (ordinal shift). Secondary outcomes included the rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS scores of 0-2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 2304 patients screened for eligibility, 1604 patients were included, with a median (IQR) age of 70 (59-80) years; 848 (52.9%) were women. A total of 534 patients were selected to undergo mechanical thrombectomy by CT, 752 by CTP, and 318 by MRI. After adjustment of confounders, there was no difference in 90-day ordinal mRS shift between patients selected by CT vs CTP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77-1.17]; P = .64) or CT vs MRI (aOR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.8-1.13]; P = .55). The rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS scores 0-2 vs 3-6) were similar between patients selected by CT vs CTP (aOR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.7-1.16]; P = .42) but lower in patients selected by MRI than CT (aOR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64-0.98]; P = .03). Successful reperfusion was more common in the CT and CTP groups compared with the MRI group (474 [88.9%] and 670 [89.5%] vs 250 [78.9%]; P < .001). No significant differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (CT, 42 [8.1%]; CTP, 43 [5.8%]; MRI, 15 [4.7%]; P = .11) or 90-day mortality (CT, 125 [23.4%]; CTP, 159 [21.1%]; MRI, 62 [19.5%]; P = .38) were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients undergoing proximal anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy in the extended time window, there were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes of patients selected with noncontrast CT compared with those selected with CTP or MRI. These findings have the potential to widen the indication for treating patients in the extended window using a simpler and more widespread noncontrast CT–only paradigm. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8576630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Medical Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85766302021-11-23 Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion Nguyen, Thanh N. Abdalkader, Mohamad Nagel, Simon Qureshi, Muhammad M. Ribo, Marc Caparros, Francois Haussen, Diogo C. Mohammaden, Mahmoud H. Sheth, Sunil A. Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago Siegler, James E. Zaidi, Syed Olive-Gadea, Marta Henon, Hilde Möhlenbruch, Markus A. Castonguay, Alicia C. Nannoni, Stefania Kaesmacher, Johannes Puri, Ajit S. Seker, Fatih Farooqui, Mudassir Salazar-Marioni, Sergio Kuhn, Anna L. Kaliaev, Artem Farzin, Behzad Boisseau, William Masoud, Hesham E. Lopez, Carlos Ynigo Rana, Ameena Kareem, Samer Abdul Sathya, Anvitha Klein, Piers Kassem, Mohammad W. Ringleb, Peter A. Cordonnier, Charlotte Gralla, Jan Fischer, Urs Michel, Patrik Jovin, Tudor G. Raymond, Jean Zaidat, Osama O. Nogueira, Raul G. JAMA Neurol Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Advanced imaging for patient selection in mechanical thrombectomy is not widely available. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients selected for mechanical thrombectomy by noncontrast computed tomography (CT) vs those selected by computed tomography perfusion (CTP) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the extended time window. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multinational cohort study included consecutive patients with proximal anterior circulation occlusion stroke presenting within 6 to 24 hours of time last seen well from January 2014 to December 2020. This study was conducted at 15 sites across 5 countries in Europe and North America. The duration of follow-up was 90 days from stroke onset. EXPOSURES: Computed tomography with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, CTP, or MRI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days (ordinal shift). Secondary outcomes included the rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS scores of 0-2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 2304 patients screened for eligibility, 1604 patients were included, with a median (IQR) age of 70 (59-80) years; 848 (52.9%) were women. A total of 534 patients were selected to undergo mechanical thrombectomy by CT, 752 by CTP, and 318 by MRI. After adjustment of confounders, there was no difference in 90-day ordinal mRS shift between patients selected by CT vs CTP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77-1.17]; P = .64) or CT vs MRI (aOR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.8-1.13]; P = .55). The rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS scores 0-2 vs 3-6) were similar between patients selected by CT vs CTP (aOR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.7-1.16]; P = .42) but lower in patients selected by MRI than CT (aOR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64-0.98]; P = .03). Successful reperfusion was more common in the CT and CTP groups compared with the MRI group (474 [88.9%] and 670 [89.5%] vs 250 [78.9%]; P < .001). No significant differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (CT, 42 [8.1%]; CTP, 43 [5.8%]; MRI, 15 [4.7%]; P = .11) or 90-day mortality (CT, 125 [23.4%]; CTP, 159 [21.1%]; MRI, 62 [19.5%]; P = .38) were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients undergoing proximal anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy in the extended time window, there were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes of patients selected with noncontrast CT compared with those selected with CTP or MRI. These findings have the potential to widen the indication for treating patients in the extended window using a simpler and more widespread noncontrast CT–only paradigm. American Medical Association 2021-11-08 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8576630/ /pubmed/34747975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4082 Text en Copyright 2021 Nguyen TN et al. JAMA Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License. |
spellingShingle | Original Investigation Nguyen, Thanh N. Abdalkader, Mohamad Nagel, Simon Qureshi, Muhammad M. Ribo, Marc Caparros, Francois Haussen, Diogo C. Mohammaden, Mahmoud H. Sheth, Sunil A. Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago Siegler, James E. Zaidi, Syed Olive-Gadea, Marta Henon, Hilde Möhlenbruch, Markus A. Castonguay, Alicia C. Nannoni, Stefania Kaesmacher, Johannes Puri, Ajit S. Seker, Fatih Farooqui, Mudassir Salazar-Marioni, Sergio Kuhn, Anna L. Kaliaev, Artem Farzin, Behzad Boisseau, William Masoud, Hesham E. Lopez, Carlos Ynigo Rana, Ameena Kareem, Samer Abdul Sathya, Anvitha Klein, Piers Kassem, Mohammad W. Ringleb, Peter A. Cordonnier, Charlotte Gralla, Jan Fischer, Urs Michel, Patrik Jovin, Tudor G. Raymond, Jean Zaidat, Osama O. Nogueira, Raul G. Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion |
title | Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion |
title_full | Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion |
title_fullStr | Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion |
title_full_unstemmed | Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion |
title_short | Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion |
title_sort | noncontrast computed tomography vs computed tomography perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging selection in late presentation of stroke with large-vessel occlusion |
topic | Original Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34747975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4082 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nguyenthanhn noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT abdalkadermohamad noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT nagelsimon noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT qureshimuhammadm noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT ribomarc noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT caparrosfrancois noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT haussendiogoc noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT mohammadenmahmoudh noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT shethsunila noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT ortegagutierrezsantiago noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT sieglerjamese noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT zaidisyed noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT olivegadeamarta noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT henonhilde noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT mohlenbruchmarkusa noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT castonguayaliciac noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT nannonistefania noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT kaesmacherjohannes noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT puriajits noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT sekerfatih noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT farooquimudassir noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT salazarmarionisergio noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT kuhnannal noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT kaliaevartem noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT farzinbehzad noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT boisseauwilliam noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT masoudheshame noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT lopezcarlosynigo noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT ranaameena noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT kareemsamerabdul noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT sathyaanvitha noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT kleinpiers noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT kassemmohammadw noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT ringlebpetera noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT cordonniercharlotte noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT grallajan noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT fischerurs noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT michelpatrik noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT jovintudorg noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT raymondjean noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT zaidatosamao noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion AT nogueiraraulg noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion |