Cargando…

Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion

IMPORTANCE: Advanced imaging for patient selection in mechanical thrombectomy is not widely available. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients selected for mechanical thrombectomy by noncontrast computed tomography (CT) vs those selected by computed tomography perfusion (CTP) or magn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nguyen, Thanh N., Abdalkader, Mohamad, Nagel, Simon, Qureshi, Muhammad M., Ribo, Marc, Caparros, Francois, Haussen, Diogo C., Mohammaden, Mahmoud H., Sheth, Sunil A., Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago, Siegler, James E., Zaidi, Syed, Olive-Gadea, Marta, Henon, Hilde, Möhlenbruch, Markus A., Castonguay, Alicia C., Nannoni, Stefania, Kaesmacher, Johannes, Puri, Ajit S., Seker, Fatih, Farooqui, Mudassir, Salazar-Marioni, Sergio, Kuhn, Anna L., Kaliaev, Artem, Farzin, Behzad, Boisseau, William, Masoud, Hesham E., Lopez, Carlos Ynigo, Rana, Ameena, Kareem, Samer Abdul, Sathya, Anvitha, Klein, Piers, Kassem, Mohammad W., Ringleb, Peter A., Cordonnier, Charlotte, Gralla, Jan, Fischer, Urs, Michel, Patrik, Jovin, Tudor G., Raymond, Jean, Zaidat, Osama O., Nogueira, Raul G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34747975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4082
_version_ 1784595915666882560
author Nguyen, Thanh N.
Abdalkader, Mohamad
Nagel, Simon
Qureshi, Muhammad M.
Ribo, Marc
Caparros, Francois
Haussen, Diogo C.
Mohammaden, Mahmoud H.
Sheth, Sunil A.
Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago
Siegler, James E.
Zaidi, Syed
Olive-Gadea, Marta
Henon, Hilde
Möhlenbruch, Markus A.
Castonguay, Alicia C.
Nannoni, Stefania
Kaesmacher, Johannes
Puri, Ajit S.
Seker, Fatih
Farooqui, Mudassir
Salazar-Marioni, Sergio
Kuhn, Anna L.
Kaliaev, Artem
Farzin, Behzad
Boisseau, William
Masoud, Hesham E.
Lopez, Carlos Ynigo
Rana, Ameena
Kareem, Samer Abdul
Sathya, Anvitha
Klein, Piers
Kassem, Mohammad W.
Ringleb, Peter A.
Cordonnier, Charlotte
Gralla, Jan
Fischer, Urs
Michel, Patrik
Jovin, Tudor G.
Raymond, Jean
Zaidat, Osama O.
Nogueira, Raul G.
author_facet Nguyen, Thanh N.
Abdalkader, Mohamad
Nagel, Simon
Qureshi, Muhammad M.
Ribo, Marc
Caparros, Francois
Haussen, Diogo C.
Mohammaden, Mahmoud H.
Sheth, Sunil A.
Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago
Siegler, James E.
Zaidi, Syed
Olive-Gadea, Marta
Henon, Hilde
Möhlenbruch, Markus A.
Castonguay, Alicia C.
Nannoni, Stefania
Kaesmacher, Johannes
Puri, Ajit S.
Seker, Fatih
Farooqui, Mudassir
Salazar-Marioni, Sergio
Kuhn, Anna L.
Kaliaev, Artem
Farzin, Behzad
Boisseau, William
Masoud, Hesham E.
Lopez, Carlos Ynigo
Rana, Ameena
Kareem, Samer Abdul
Sathya, Anvitha
Klein, Piers
Kassem, Mohammad W.
Ringleb, Peter A.
Cordonnier, Charlotte
Gralla, Jan
Fischer, Urs
Michel, Patrik
Jovin, Tudor G.
Raymond, Jean
Zaidat, Osama O.
Nogueira, Raul G.
author_sort Nguyen, Thanh N.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Advanced imaging for patient selection in mechanical thrombectomy is not widely available. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients selected for mechanical thrombectomy by noncontrast computed tomography (CT) vs those selected by computed tomography perfusion (CTP) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the extended time window. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multinational cohort study included consecutive patients with proximal anterior circulation occlusion stroke presenting within 6 to 24 hours of time last seen well from January 2014 to December 2020. This study was conducted at 15 sites across 5 countries in Europe and North America. The duration of follow-up was 90 days from stroke onset. EXPOSURES: Computed tomography with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, CTP, or MRI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days (ordinal shift). Secondary outcomes included the rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS scores of 0-2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 2304 patients screened for eligibility, 1604 patients were included, with a median (IQR) age of 70 (59-80) years; 848 (52.9%) were women. A total of 534 patients were selected to undergo mechanical thrombectomy by CT, 752 by CTP, and 318 by MRI. After adjustment of confounders, there was no difference in 90-day ordinal mRS shift between patients selected by CT vs CTP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77-1.17]; P = .64) or CT vs MRI (aOR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.8-1.13]; P = .55). The rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS scores 0-2 vs 3-6) were similar between patients selected by CT vs CTP (aOR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.7-1.16]; P = .42) but lower in patients selected by MRI than CT (aOR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64-0.98]; P = .03). Successful reperfusion was more common in the CT and CTP groups compared with the MRI group (474 [88.9%] and 670 [89.5%] vs 250 [78.9%]; P < .001). No significant differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (CT, 42 [8.1%]; CTP, 43 [5.8%]; MRI, 15 [4.7%]; P = .11) or 90-day mortality (CT, 125 [23.4%]; CTP, 159 [21.1%]; MRI, 62 [19.5%]; P = .38) were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients undergoing proximal anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy in the extended time window, there were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes of patients selected with noncontrast CT compared with those selected with CTP or MRI. These findings have the potential to widen the indication for treating patients in the extended window using a simpler and more widespread noncontrast CT–only paradigm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8576630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85766302021-11-23 Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion Nguyen, Thanh N. Abdalkader, Mohamad Nagel, Simon Qureshi, Muhammad M. Ribo, Marc Caparros, Francois Haussen, Diogo C. Mohammaden, Mahmoud H. Sheth, Sunil A. Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago Siegler, James E. Zaidi, Syed Olive-Gadea, Marta Henon, Hilde Möhlenbruch, Markus A. Castonguay, Alicia C. Nannoni, Stefania Kaesmacher, Johannes Puri, Ajit S. Seker, Fatih Farooqui, Mudassir Salazar-Marioni, Sergio Kuhn, Anna L. Kaliaev, Artem Farzin, Behzad Boisseau, William Masoud, Hesham E. Lopez, Carlos Ynigo Rana, Ameena Kareem, Samer Abdul Sathya, Anvitha Klein, Piers Kassem, Mohammad W. Ringleb, Peter A. Cordonnier, Charlotte Gralla, Jan Fischer, Urs Michel, Patrik Jovin, Tudor G. Raymond, Jean Zaidat, Osama O. Nogueira, Raul G. JAMA Neurol Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Advanced imaging for patient selection in mechanical thrombectomy is not widely available. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes of patients selected for mechanical thrombectomy by noncontrast computed tomography (CT) vs those selected by computed tomography perfusion (CTP) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the extended time window. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This multinational cohort study included consecutive patients with proximal anterior circulation occlusion stroke presenting within 6 to 24 hours of time last seen well from January 2014 to December 2020. This study was conducted at 15 sites across 5 countries in Europe and North America. The duration of follow-up was 90 days from stroke onset. EXPOSURES: Computed tomography with Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score, CTP, or MRI. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the distribution of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at 90 days (ordinal shift). Secondary outcomes included the rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS scores of 0-2), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 2304 patients screened for eligibility, 1604 patients were included, with a median (IQR) age of 70 (59-80) years; 848 (52.9%) were women. A total of 534 patients were selected to undergo mechanical thrombectomy by CT, 752 by CTP, and 318 by MRI. After adjustment of confounders, there was no difference in 90-day ordinal mRS shift between patients selected by CT vs CTP (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.77-1.17]; P = .64) or CT vs MRI (aOR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.8-1.13]; P = .55). The rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS scores 0-2 vs 3-6) were similar between patients selected by CT vs CTP (aOR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.7-1.16]; P = .42) but lower in patients selected by MRI than CT (aOR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64-0.98]; P = .03). Successful reperfusion was more common in the CT and CTP groups compared with the MRI group (474 [88.9%] and 670 [89.5%] vs 250 [78.9%]; P < .001). No significant differences in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (CT, 42 [8.1%]; CTP, 43 [5.8%]; MRI, 15 [4.7%]; P = .11) or 90-day mortality (CT, 125 [23.4%]; CTP, 159 [21.1%]; MRI, 62 [19.5%]; P = .38) were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In patients undergoing proximal anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy in the extended time window, there were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes of patients selected with noncontrast CT compared with those selected with CTP or MRI. These findings have the potential to widen the indication for treating patients in the extended window using a simpler and more widespread noncontrast CT–only paradigm. American Medical Association 2021-11-08 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8576630/ /pubmed/34747975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4082 Text en Copyright 2021 Nguyen TN et al. JAMA Neurology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Nguyen, Thanh N.
Abdalkader, Mohamad
Nagel, Simon
Qureshi, Muhammad M.
Ribo, Marc
Caparros, Francois
Haussen, Diogo C.
Mohammaden, Mahmoud H.
Sheth, Sunil A.
Ortega-Gutierrez, Santiago
Siegler, James E.
Zaidi, Syed
Olive-Gadea, Marta
Henon, Hilde
Möhlenbruch, Markus A.
Castonguay, Alicia C.
Nannoni, Stefania
Kaesmacher, Johannes
Puri, Ajit S.
Seker, Fatih
Farooqui, Mudassir
Salazar-Marioni, Sergio
Kuhn, Anna L.
Kaliaev, Artem
Farzin, Behzad
Boisseau, William
Masoud, Hesham E.
Lopez, Carlos Ynigo
Rana, Ameena
Kareem, Samer Abdul
Sathya, Anvitha
Klein, Piers
Kassem, Mohammad W.
Ringleb, Peter A.
Cordonnier, Charlotte
Gralla, Jan
Fischer, Urs
Michel, Patrik
Jovin, Tudor G.
Raymond, Jean
Zaidat, Osama O.
Nogueira, Raul G.
Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion
title Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion
title_full Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion
title_fullStr Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion
title_full_unstemmed Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion
title_short Noncontrast Computed Tomography vs Computed Tomography Perfusion or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Selection in Late Presentation of Stroke With Large-Vessel Occlusion
title_sort noncontrast computed tomography vs computed tomography perfusion or magnetic resonance imaging selection in late presentation of stroke with large-vessel occlusion
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34747975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4082
work_keys_str_mv AT nguyenthanhn noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT abdalkadermohamad noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT nagelsimon noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT qureshimuhammadm noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT ribomarc noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT caparrosfrancois noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT haussendiogoc noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT mohammadenmahmoudh noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT shethsunila noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT ortegagutierrezsantiago noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT sieglerjamese noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT zaidisyed noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT olivegadeamarta noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT henonhilde noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT mohlenbruchmarkusa noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT castonguayaliciac noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT nannonistefania noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT kaesmacherjohannes noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT puriajits noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT sekerfatih noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT farooquimudassir noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT salazarmarionisergio noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT kuhnannal noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT kaliaevartem noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT farzinbehzad noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT boisseauwilliam noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT masoudheshame noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT lopezcarlosynigo noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT ranaameena noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT kareemsamerabdul noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT sathyaanvitha noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT kleinpiers noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT kassemmohammadw noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT ringlebpetera noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT cordonniercharlotte noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT grallajan noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT fischerurs noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT michelpatrik noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT jovintudorg noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT raymondjean noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT zaidatosamao noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion
AT nogueiraraulg noncontrastcomputedtomographyvscomputedtomographyperfusionormagneticresonanceimagingselectioninlatepresentationofstrokewithlargevesselocclusion