Cargando…
Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001)
BACKGROUND: Information regarding the implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is scarce, and whether ILC patients with 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) can be omitted from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains controversial. This study...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790794 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5169 |
_version_ | 1784595922375671808 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Juliang Ling, Yuwei Wang, Ting Yan, Changjiao Huang, Meiling Fan, Zhimin Ling, Rui |
author_facet | Zhang, Juliang Ling, Yuwei Wang, Ting Yan, Changjiao Huang, Meiling Fan, Zhimin Ling, Rui |
author_sort | Zhang, Juliang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Information regarding the implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is scarce, and whether ILC patients with 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) can be omitted from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare involvement of SLNs and non-SLNs between patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ILC. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical and pathological data of invasive breast cancer patients from 37 medical centers in China from January 2018 to December 2018. The number of resected SLNs, positive rate of SLNs, and non-SLNs metastasis were compared between patients with IDC and ILC. RESULTS: A total of 6,922 patients were included, comprising 6,650 with IDC (96.1%) and 272 with ILC (3.9%). No difference was observed in the number of resected SLNs between patients with IDC and ILC (IDC: 4.0±1.9 vs. ILC: 3.9±1.6, P=0.352). The positive rate of SLNs was significantly higher in patients with IDC than that in patients with ILC (19.3% in IDC vs. 12.9% in ILC, P=0.008). The difference in positive rate of SLNs between IDC and ILC was mainly attributed to macro-metastasis. For patients with positive SLNs who received ALND, and those with 1–2 positive SLNs, the metastatic rate of non-SLNs in the ILC group was higher than that in the IDC group (for patients with positive SLNs: 50.0% in ILC vs. 39.9% in IDC, P=0.317; for patients with 1–2 positive SLNs: 45.4% in ILC vs. 34.8% in IDC, P=0.366), but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ILC had similar number of resected SLNs and lower positive rate of SLNs compared to those with IDC. In participants with 1–2 positive SLNs, the ILC group had an increased tendency for non-SLNs metastasis compared with the IDC group. Surgeons may need to be more cautious about omitting ALND for ILC patients with 1–2 positive SLNs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8576666 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85766662021-11-16 Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001) Zhang, Juliang Ling, Yuwei Wang, Ting Yan, Changjiao Huang, Meiling Fan, Zhimin Ling, Rui Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Information regarding the implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is scarce, and whether ILC patients with 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) can be omitted from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare involvement of SLNs and non-SLNs between patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ILC. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical and pathological data of invasive breast cancer patients from 37 medical centers in China from January 2018 to December 2018. The number of resected SLNs, positive rate of SLNs, and non-SLNs metastasis were compared between patients with IDC and ILC. RESULTS: A total of 6,922 patients were included, comprising 6,650 with IDC (96.1%) and 272 with ILC (3.9%). No difference was observed in the number of resected SLNs between patients with IDC and ILC (IDC: 4.0±1.9 vs. ILC: 3.9±1.6, P=0.352). The positive rate of SLNs was significantly higher in patients with IDC than that in patients with ILC (19.3% in IDC vs. 12.9% in ILC, P=0.008). The difference in positive rate of SLNs between IDC and ILC was mainly attributed to macro-metastasis. For patients with positive SLNs who received ALND, and those with 1–2 positive SLNs, the metastatic rate of non-SLNs in the ILC group was higher than that in the IDC group (for patients with positive SLNs: 50.0% in ILC vs. 39.9% in IDC, P=0.317; for patients with 1–2 positive SLNs: 45.4% in ILC vs. 34.8% in IDC, P=0.366), but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ILC had similar number of resected SLNs and lower positive rate of SLNs compared to those with IDC. In participants with 1–2 positive SLNs, the ILC group had an increased tendency for non-SLNs metastasis compared with the IDC group. Surgeons may need to be more cautious about omitting ALND for ILC patients with 1–2 positive SLNs. AME Publishing Company 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8576666/ /pubmed/34790794 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5169 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhang, Juliang Ling, Yuwei Wang, Ting Yan, Changjiao Huang, Meiling Fan, Zhimin Ling, Rui Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001) |
title | Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001) |
title_full | Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001) |
title_fullStr | Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001) |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001) |
title_short | Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001) |
title_sort | analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (csbrs-001) |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576666/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790794 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5169 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangjuliang analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001 AT lingyuwei analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001 AT wangting analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001 AT yanchangjiao analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001 AT huangmeiling analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001 AT fanzhimin analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001 AT lingrui analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001 AT analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001 |