Cargando…

Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001)

BACKGROUND: Information regarding the implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is scarce, and whether ILC patients with 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) can be omitted from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains controversial. This study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Juliang, Ling, Yuwei, Wang, Ting, Yan, Changjiao, Huang, Meiling, Fan, Zhimin, Ling, Rui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790794
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5169
_version_ 1784595922375671808
author Zhang, Juliang
Ling, Yuwei
Wang, Ting
Yan, Changjiao
Huang, Meiling
Fan, Zhimin
Ling, Rui
author_facet Zhang, Juliang
Ling, Yuwei
Wang, Ting
Yan, Changjiao
Huang, Meiling
Fan, Zhimin
Ling, Rui
author_sort Zhang, Juliang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Information regarding the implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is scarce, and whether ILC patients with 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) can be omitted from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare involvement of SLNs and non-SLNs between patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ILC. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical and pathological data of invasive breast cancer patients from 37 medical centers in China from January 2018 to December 2018. The number of resected SLNs, positive rate of SLNs, and non-SLNs metastasis were compared between patients with IDC and ILC. RESULTS: A total of 6,922 patients were included, comprising 6,650 with IDC (96.1%) and 272 with ILC (3.9%). No difference was observed in the number of resected SLNs between patients with IDC and ILC (IDC: 4.0±1.9 vs. ILC: 3.9±1.6, P=0.352). The positive rate of SLNs was significantly higher in patients with IDC than that in patients with ILC (19.3% in IDC vs. 12.9% in ILC, P=0.008). The difference in positive rate of SLNs between IDC and ILC was mainly attributed to macro-metastasis. For patients with positive SLNs who received ALND, and those with 1–2 positive SLNs, the metastatic rate of non-SLNs in the ILC group was higher than that in the IDC group (for patients with positive SLNs: 50.0% in ILC vs. 39.9% in IDC, P=0.317; for patients with 1–2 positive SLNs: 45.4% in ILC vs. 34.8% in IDC, P=0.366), but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ILC had similar number of resected SLNs and lower positive rate of SLNs compared to those with IDC. In participants with 1–2 positive SLNs, the ILC group had an increased tendency for non-SLNs metastasis compared with the IDC group. Surgeons may need to be more cautious about omitting ALND for ILC patients with 1–2 positive SLNs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8576666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85766662021-11-16 Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001) Zhang, Juliang Ling, Yuwei Wang, Ting Yan, Changjiao Huang, Meiling Fan, Zhimin Ling, Rui Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Information regarding the implementation of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is scarce, and whether ILC patients with 1–2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) can be omitted from axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare involvement of SLNs and non-SLNs between patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ILC. METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical and pathological data of invasive breast cancer patients from 37 medical centers in China from January 2018 to December 2018. The number of resected SLNs, positive rate of SLNs, and non-SLNs metastasis were compared between patients with IDC and ILC. RESULTS: A total of 6,922 patients were included, comprising 6,650 with IDC (96.1%) and 272 with ILC (3.9%). No difference was observed in the number of resected SLNs between patients with IDC and ILC (IDC: 4.0±1.9 vs. ILC: 3.9±1.6, P=0.352). The positive rate of SLNs was significantly higher in patients with IDC than that in patients with ILC (19.3% in IDC vs. 12.9% in ILC, P=0.008). The difference in positive rate of SLNs between IDC and ILC was mainly attributed to macro-metastasis. For patients with positive SLNs who received ALND, and those with 1–2 positive SLNs, the metastatic rate of non-SLNs in the ILC group was higher than that in the IDC group (for patients with positive SLNs: 50.0% in ILC vs. 39.9% in IDC, P=0.317; for patients with 1–2 positive SLNs: 45.4% in ILC vs. 34.8% in IDC, P=0.366), but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ILC had similar number of resected SLNs and lower positive rate of SLNs compared to those with IDC. In participants with 1–2 positive SLNs, the ILC group had an increased tendency for non-SLNs metastasis compared with the IDC group. Surgeons may need to be more cautious about omitting ALND for ILC patients with 1–2 positive SLNs. AME Publishing Company 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8576666/ /pubmed/34790794 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5169 Text en 2021 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Juliang
Ling, Yuwei
Wang, Ting
Yan, Changjiao
Huang, Meiling
Fan, Zhimin
Ling, Rui
Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001)
title Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001)
title_full Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001)
title_fullStr Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001)
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001)
title_short Analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (CSBrS-001)
title_sort analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy and non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in invasive ductal and invasive lobular breast cancer: a nationwide cross-sectional study (csbrs-001)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790794
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-5169
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangjuliang analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001
AT lingyuwei analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001
AT wangting analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001
AT yanchangjiao analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001
AT huangmeiling analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001
AT fanzhimin analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001
AT lingrui analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001
AT analysisofsentinellymphnodebiopsyandnonsentinellymphnodemetastasisininvasiveductalandinvasivelobularbreastcanceranationwidecrosssectionalstudycsbrs001