Cargando…

Fixation and Implant Retention of Extracapsular Femoral Neck Periprosthetic Fractures Around Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty – A Case Series

BACKGROUND: Extracapsular femoral neck fractures in the presence of a resurfacing hip arthroplasty (RHA) appear to be independent of suboptimal technique during the initial implantation of the RHA and present with a similar etiology as native hip fractures – that is, a fragility fracture related to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Arpit, Ayub, Anouska, Iranpour, Farhad, Subramanian, Padmanabhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Indian Orthopaedic Research Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790615
http://dx.doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i07.2336
_version_ 1784595948362530816
author Patel, Arpit
Ayub, Anouska
Iranpour, Farhad
Subramanian, Padmanabhan
author_facet Patel, Arpit
Ayub, Anouska
Iranpour, Farhad
Subramanian, Padmanabhan
author_sort Patel, Arpit
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Extracapsular femoral neck fractures in the presence of a resurfacing hip arthroplasty (RHA) appear to be independent of suboptimal technique during the initial implantation of the RHA and present with a similar etiology as native hip fractures – that is, a fragility fracture related to pathological or age-related osteoporosis, as a consequence of trauma. In the presence of a well-fixed and previously well-functioning RHA, the options for management include revision arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). In the absence of loosening through mechanisms of wear, infection, metallosis, or suboptimal prosthesis positioning, many authors have advocated ORIF with implant retention. However, there is often debate regarding the use of total hip arthroplasty in these cases CASE SERIES: The authors conducted a thorough assessment of the literature followed by a retrospective review of outcomes for three patients treated by ORIF with implant retention for extracapsular femoral neck fractures around a RHA, using a standardized technique. All patients were independently mobile and active with well-fixed and well-functioning RHAs before the date of injury. All patients suffered low-energy trauma resulting in the fracture. There were no intraoperative or perioperative complications. All patients achieved full weight-bearing status and independent mobility. Two patients achieved radiographic union and returned to full range of movement and independent mobilization comparable to their preoperative state. One patient was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: The authors believe that fixation of extracapsular proximal femoral fractures distal to a well-fixed, well-functioning RHA is a good management option in an independent and active patient. A higher level of evidence is needed to investigate the surgical management options of these injuries comparing osteosynthesis with revision arthroplasty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8576781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Indian Orthopaedic Research Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85767812021-11-16 Fixation and Implant Retention of Extracapsular Femoral Neck Periprosthetic Fractures Around Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty – A Case Series Patel, Arpit Ayub, Anouska Iranpour, Farhad Subramanian, Padmanabhan J Orthop Case Rep Original Article BACKGROUND: Extracapsular femoral neck fractures in the presence of a resurfacing hip arthroplasty (RHA) appear to be independent of suboptimal technique during the initial implantation of the RHA and present with a similar etiology as native hip fractures – that is, a fragility fracture related to pathological or age-related osteoporosis, as a consequence of trauma. In the presence of a well-fixed and previously well-functioning RHA, the options for management include revision arthroplasty or open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). In the absence of loosening through mechanisms of wear, infection, metallosis, or suboptimal prosthesis positioning, many authors have advocated ORIF with implant retention. However, there is often debate regarding the use of total hip arthroplasty in these cases CASE SERIES: The authors conducted a thorough assessment of the literature followed by a retrospective review of outcomes for three patients treated by ORIF with implant retention for extracapsular femoral neck fractures around a RHA, using a standardized technique. All patients were independently mobile and active with well-fixed and well-functioning RHAs before the date of injury. All patients suffered low-energy trauma resulting in the fracture. There were no intraoperative or perioperative complications. All patients achieved full weight-bearing status and independent mobility. Two patients achieved radiographic union and returned to full range of movement and independent mobilization comparable to their preoperative state. One patient was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: The authors believe that fixation of extracapsular proximal femoral fractures distal to a well-fixed, well-functioning RHA is a good management option in an independent and active patient. A higher level of evidence is needed to investigate the surgical management options of these injuries comparing osteosynthesis with revision arthroplasty. Indian Orthopaedic Research Group 2021-07 2021-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8576781/ /pubmed/34790615 http://dx.doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i07.2336 Text en Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patel, Arpit
Ayub, Anouska
Iranpour, Farhad
Subramanian, Padmanabhan
Fixation and Implant Retention of Extracapsular Femoral Neck Periprosthetic Fractures Around Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty – A Case Series
title Fixation and Implant Retention of Extracapsular Femoral Neck Periprosthetic Fractures Around Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty – A Case Series
title_full Fixation and Implant Retention of Extracapsular Femoral Neck Periprosthetic Fractures Around Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty – A Case Series
title_fullStr Fixation and Implant Retention of Extracapsular Femoral Neck Periprosthetic Fractures Around Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty – A Case Series
title_full_unstemmed Fixation and Implant Retention of Extracapsular Femoral Neck Periprosthetic Fractures Around Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty – A Case Series
title_short Fixation and Implant Retention of Extracapsular Femoral Neck Periprosthetic Fractures Around Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty – A Case Series
title_sort fixation and implant retention of extracapsular femoral neck periprosthetic fractures around hip resurfacing arthroplasty – a case series
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34790615
http://dx.doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2021.v11.i07.2336
work_keys_str_mv AT patelarpit fixationandimplantretentionofextracapsularfemoralneckperiprostheticfracturesaroundhipresurfacingarthroplastyacaseseries
AT ayubanouska fixationandimplantretentionofextracapsularfemoralneckperiprostheticfracturesaroundhipresurfacingarthroplastyacaseseries
AT iranpourfarhad fixationandimplantretentionofextracapsularfemoralneckperiprostheticfracturesaroundhipresurfacingarthroplastyacaseseries
AT subramanianpadmanabhan fixationandimplantretentionofextracapsularfemoralneckperiprostheticfracturesaroundhipresurfacingarthroplastyacaseseries