Cargando…
Modified Arnold expander: an alternative for mandibular arch expansion
INTRODUCTION: Due to the anatomical constraints of the mandible, mandibular dental arch usually serves as a guideline to determine the required changes in the maxillary transverse dimension. The Schwarz appliance and the Lip Bumper are the traditional orthodontic appliances for mandibular arch expan...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dental Press International
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e21spe5 |
_version_ | 1784595962991214592 |
---|---|
author | ANDRADE, Ildeu PASCHOAL, Marco Aurélio Benini FIGUEIREDO, Natália Couto |
author_facet | ANDRADE, Ildeu PASCHOAL, Marco Aurélio Benini FIGUEIREDO, Natália Couto |
author_sort | ANDRADE, Ildeu |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Due to the anatomical constraints of the mandible, mandibular dental arch usually serves as a guideline to determine the required changes in the maxillary transverse dimension. The Schwarz appliance and the Lip Bumper are the traditional orthodontic appliances for mandibular arch expansion in patients with borderline amounts of crowding, and/or transverse discrepancy. However, they often require patient cooperation, which may be a concern for orthodontists in daily practice. OBJECTIVES: This article illustrates a simple fixed orthodontic device as an alternative to achieve mandibular arch expansion in patients with moderate tooth-size/arch-length discrepancy. The four reported cases refer to 8 to 10-year-old patients in the mixed dentition, with an Angle Class I or Class II malocclusion, transverse deficiency in both arches, moderate crowding and/or posterior crossbite, combined with compromised smile aesthetics. The patients were treated with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) using Hass expander appliance and the modified Arnold expander (MAE). CONCLUSION: This low-cost compliance-free orthodontic appliance provided dentoalveolar decompensation by means of uprighting the posterior teeth, with minimal or no adjustments during treatment. The final results were achieved in only three to four months, and fulfilled all treatment objectives, such as an increase in the arch perimeter and width, and a better teeth alignment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8576860 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dental Press International |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85768602021-11-18 Modified Arnold expander: an alternative for mandibular arch expansion ANDRADE, Ildeu PASCHOAL, Marco Aurélio Benini FIGUEIREDO, Natália Couto Dental Press J Orthod Special Article INTRODUCTION: Due to the anatomical constraints of the mandible, mandibular dental arch usually serves as a guideline to determine the required changes in the maxillary transverse dimension. The Schwarz appliance and the Lip Bumper are the traditional orthodontic appliances for mandibular arch expansion in patients with borderline amounts of crowding, and/or transverse discrepancy. However, they often require patient cooperation, which may be a concern for orthodontists in daily practice. OBJECTIVES: This article illustrates a simple fixed orthodontic device as an alternative to achieve mandibular arch expansion in patients with moderate tooth-size/arch-length discrepancy. The four reported cases refer to 8 to 10-year-old patients in the mixed dentition, with an Angle Class I or Class II malocclusion, transverse deficiency in both arches, moderate crowding and/or posterior crossbite, combined with compromised smile aesthetics. The patients were treated with rapid maxillary expansion (RME) using Hass expander appliance and the modified Arnold expander (MAE). CONCLUSION: This low-cost compliance-free orthodontic appliance provided dentoalveolar decompensation by means of uprighting the posterior teeth, with minimal or no adjustments during treatment. The final results were achieved in only three to four months, and fulfilled all treatment objectives, such as an increase in the arch perimeter and width, and a better teeth alignment. Dental Press International 2021-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8576860/ /pubmed/35640085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e21spe5 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Special Article ANDRADE, Ildeu PASCHOAL, Marco Aurélio Benini FIGUEIREDO, Natália Couto Modified Arnold expander: an alternative for mandibular arch expansion |
title | Modified Arnold expander: an alternative for mandibular arch expansion |
title_full | Modified Arnold expander: an alternative for mandibular arch expansion |
title_fullStr | Modified Arnold expander: an alternative for mandibular arch expansion |
title_full_unstemmed | Modified Arnold expander: an alternative for mandibular arch expansion |
title_short | Modified Arnold expander: an alternative for mandibular arch expansion |
title_sort | modified arnold expander: an alternative for mandibular arch expansion |
topic | Special Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576860/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e21spe5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andradeildeu modifiedarnoldexpanderanalternativeformandibulararchexpansion AT paschoalmarcoaureliobenini modifiedarnoldexpanderanalternativeformandibulararchexpansion AT figueiredonataliacouto modifiedarnoldexpanderanalternativeformandibulararchexpansion |