Cargando…

Sperm chromatin condensation as an in vivo fertility biomarker in bulls: a flow cytometry approach

BACKGROUND: Genetic selection in cattle has been directed to increase milk production. This, coupled to the fact that the vast majority of bovine artificial inseminations (AI) are performed using cryopreserved sperm, have led to a reduction of fertility rates over the years. Thus, seeking sensitive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Llavanera, Marc, Ribas-Maynou, Jordi, Delgado-Bermúdez, Ariadna, Recuero, Sandra, Muiño, Rodrigo, Hidalgo, Carlos O., Tamargo, Carolina, Bonet, Sergi, Mateo-Otero, Yentel, Yeste, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00634-7
_version_ 1784595967530500096
author Llavanera, Marc
Ribas-Maynou, Jordi
Delgado-Bermúdez, Ariadna
Recuero, Sandra
Muiño, Rodrigo
Hidalgo, Carlos O.
Tamargo, Carolina
Bonet, Sergi
Mateo-Otero, Yentel
Yeste, Marc
author_facet Llavanera, Marc
Ribas-Maynou, Jordi
Delgado-Bermúdez, Ariadna
Recuero, Sandra
Muiño, Rodrigo
Hidalgo, Carlos O.
Tamargo, Carolina
Bonet, Sergi
Mateo-Otero, Yentel
Yeste, Marc
author_sort Llavanera, Marc
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genetic selection in cattle has been directed to increase milk production. This, coupled to the fact that the vast majority of bovine artificial inseminations (AI) are performed using cryopreserved sperm, have led to a reduction of fertility rates over the years. Thus, seeking sensitive and specific sperm biomarkers able to predict fertility rates is of vital importance to improve cattle reproductive efficiency. In humans, sperm chromatin condensation evaluated through chromomycin A3 (CMA3) has recently been purported to be a powerful biomarker for sperm functional status and male infertility. The objectives of the present study were: a) to set up a flow cytometry method for simultaneously evaluating chromatin condensation and sperm viability, and b) to test whether this parameter could be used as a predictor of in vivo fertility in bulls. The study included pools of three independent cryopreserved ejaculates per bull from 25 Holstein males. Reproductive outcomes of each sire were determined by non-return rates, which were used to classify bulls into two groups (highly fertile and subfertile). RESULTS: Chromatin condensation status of bovine sperm was evaluated through the combination of CMA3 and Yo-Pro-1 staining and flow cytometry. Sperm quality parameters (morphology, viability, total and progressive motility) were also assessed. Pearson correlation coefficients and ROC curves were calculated to assess their capacity to predict in vivo fertility. Sperm morphology, viability and total motility presented an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.54, 0.64 and 0.68, respectively (P > 0.05), and thus were not able to discriminate between fertile and subfertile individuals. Alternatively, while the percentage of progressively motile sperm showed a significant predictive value, with an AUC of 0.73 (P = 0.05), CMA3/Yo-Pro-1 staining even depicted superior results for the prediction of in vivo fertility in bulls. Specifically, the percentage of viable sperm with poor chromatin condensation showed better accuracy and precision to predict in vivo fertility, with an AUC of 0.78 (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Chromatin condensation evaluated through CMA3/Yo-Pro-1 and flow cytometry is defined here as a more powerful tool than conventional sperm parameters to predict bull in vivo fertility, with a potential ability to maximising the efficiency of dairy breeding industry. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40104-021-00634-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8576882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85768822021-11-10 Sperm chromatin condensation as an in vivo fertility biomarker in bulls: a flow cytometry approach Llavanera, Marc Ribas-Maynou, Jordi Delgado-Bermúdez, Ariadna Recuero, Sandra Muiño, Rodrigo Hidalgo, Carlos O. Tamargo, Carolina Bonet, Sergi Mateo-Otero, Yentel Yeste, Marc J Anim Sci Biotechnol Research BACKGROUND: Genetic selection in cattle has been directed to increase milk production. This, coupled to the fact that the vast majority of bovine artificial inseminations (AI) are performed using cryopreserved sperm, have led to a reduction of fertility rates over the years. Thus, seeking sensitive and specific sperm biomarkers able to predict fertility rates is of vital importance to improve cattle reproductive efficiency. In humans, sperm chromatin condensation evaluated through chromomycin A3 (CMA3) has recently been purported to be a powerful biomarker for sperm functional status and male infertility. The objectives of the present study were: a) to set up a flow cytometry method for simultaneously evaluating chromatin condensation and sperm viability, and b) to test whether this parameter could be used as a predictor of in vivo fertility in bulls. The study included pools of three independent cryopreserved ejaculates per bull from 25 Holstein males. Reproductive outcomes of each sire were determined by non-return rates, which were used to classify bulls into two groups (highly fertile and subfertile). RESULTS: Chromatin condensation status of bovine sperm was evaluated through the combination of CMA3 and Yo-Pro-1 staining and flow cytometry. Sperm quality parameters (morphology, viability, total and progressive motility) were also assessed. Pearson correlation coefficients and ROC curves were calculated to assess their capacity to predict in vivo fertility. Sperm morphology, viability and total motility presented an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.54, 0.64 and 0.68, respectively (P > 0.05), and thus were not able to discriminate between fertile and subfertile individuals. Alternatively, while the percentage of progressively motile sperm showed a significant predictive value, with an AUC of 0.73 (P = 0.05), CMA3/Yo-Pro-1 staining even depicted superior results for the prediction of in vivo fertility in bulls. Specifically, the percentage of viable sperm with poor chromatin condensation showed better accuracy and precision to predict in vivo fertility, with an AUC of 0.78 (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Chromatin condensation evaluated through CMA3/Yo-Pro-1 and flow cytometry is defined here as a more powerful tool than conventional sperm parameters to predict bull in vivo fertility, with a potential ability to maximising the efficiency of dairy breeding industry. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40104-021-00634-7. BioMed Central 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8576882/ /pubmed/34749810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00634-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Llavanera, Marc
Ribas-Maynou, Jordi
Delgado-Bermúdez, Ariadna
Recuero, Sandra
Muiño, Rodrigo
Hidalgo, Carlos O.
Tamargo, Carolina
Bonet, Sergi
Mateo-Otero, Yentel
Yeste, Marc
Sperm chromatin condensation as an in vivo fertility biomarker in bulls: a flow cytometry approach
title Sperm chromatin condensation as an in vivo fertility biomarker in bulls: a flow cytometry approach
title_full Sperm chromatin condensation as an in vivo fertility biomarker in bulls: a flow cytometry approach
title_fullStr Sperm chromatin condensation as an in vivo fertility biomarker in bulls: a flow cytometry approach
title_full_unstemmed Sperm chromatin condensation as an in vivo fertility biomarker in bulls: a flow cytometry approach
title_short Sperm chromatin condensation as an in vivo fertility biomarker in bulls: a flow cytometry approach
title_sort sperm chromatin condensation as an in vivo fertility biomarker in bulls: a flow cytometry approach
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00634-7
work_keys_str_mv AT llavaneramarc spermchromatincondensationasaninvivofertilitybiomarkerinbullsaflowcytometryapproach
AT ribasmaynoujordi spermchromatincondensationasaninvivofertilitybiomarkerinbullsaflowcytometryapproach
AT delgadobermudezariadna spermchromatincondensationasaninvivofertilitybiomarkerinbullsaflowcytometryapproach
AT recuerosandra spermchromatincondensationasaninvivofertilitybiomarkerinbullsaflowcytometryapproach
AT muinorodrigo spermchromatincondensationasaninvivofertilitybiomarkerinbullsaflowcytometryapproach
AT hidalgocarloso spermchromatincondensationasaninvivofertilitybiomarkerinbullsaflowcytometryapproach
AT tamargocarolina spermchromatincondensationasaninvivofertilitybiomarkerinbullsaflowcytometryapproach
AT bonetsergi spermchromatincondensationasaninvivofertilitybiomarkerinbullsaflowcytometryapproach
AT mateooteroyentel spermchromatincondensationasaninvivofertilitybiomarkerinbullsaflowcytometryapproach
AT yestemarc spermchromatincondensationasaninvivofertilitybiomarkerinbullsaflowcytometryapproach