Cargando…
General deep learning model for detecting diabetic retinopathy
BACKGROUND: Doctors can detect symptoms of diabetic retinopathy (DR) early by using retinal ophthalmoscopy, and they can improve diagnostic efficiency with the assistance of deep learning to select treatments and support personnel workflow. Conventionally, most deep learning methods for DR diagnosis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04005-x |
_version_ | 1784595983127019520 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Ping-Nan Lee, Chia-Chiang Liang, Chang-Min Pao, Shu-I Huang, Ke-Hao Lin, Ke-Feng |
author_facet | Chen, Ping-Nan Lee, Chia-Chiang Liang, Chang-Min Pao, Shu-I Huang, Ke-Hao Lin, Ke-Feng |
author_sort | Chen, Ping-Nan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Doctors can detect symptoms of diabetic retinopathy (DR) early by using retinal ophthalmoscopy, and they can improve diagnostic efficiency with the assistance of deep learning to select treatments and support personnel workflow. Conventionally, most deep learning methods for DR diagnosis categorize retinal ophthalmoscopy images into training and validation data sets according to the 80/20 rule, and they use the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) in data processing (e.g., rotating, scaling, and translating training images) to increase the number of training samples. Oversampling training may lead to overfitting of the training model. Therefore, untrained or unverified images can yield erroneous predictions. Although the accuracy of prediction results is 90%–99%, this overfitting of training data may distort training module variables. RESULTS: This study uses a 2-stage training method to solve the overfitting problem. In the training phase, to build the model, the Learning module 1 used to identify the DR and no-DR. The Learning module 2 on SMOTE synthetic datasets to identify the mild-NPDR, moderate NPDR, severe NPDR and proliferative DR classification. These two modules also used early stopping and data dividing methods to reduce overfitting by oversampling. In the test phase, we use the DIARETDB0, DIARETDB1, eOphtha, MESSIDOR, and DRIVE datasets to evaluate the performance of the training network. The prediction accuracy achieved to 85.38%, 84.27%, 85.75%, 86.73%, and 92.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the experiment, a general deep learning model for detecting DR was developed, and it could be used with all DR databases. We provided a simple method of addressing the imbalance of DR databases, and this method can be used with other medical images. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8576963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85769632021-11-10 General deep learning model for detecting diabetic retinopathy Chen, Ping-Nan Lee, Chia-Chiang Liang, Chang-Min Pao, Shu-I Huang, Ke-Hao Lin, Ke-Feng BMC Bioinformatics Research BACKGROUND: Doctors can detect symptoms of diabetic retinopathy (DR) early by using retinal ophthalmoscopy, and they can improve diagnostic efficiency with the assistance of deep learning to select treatments and support personnel workflow. Conventionally, most deep learning methods for DR diagnosis categorize retinal ophthalmoscopy images into training and validation data sets according to the 80/20 rule, and they use the synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) in data processing (e.g., rotating, scaling, and translating training images) to increase the number of training samples. Oversampling training may lead to overfitting of the training model. Therefore, untrained or unverified images can yield erroneous predictions. Although the accuracy of prediction results is 90%–99%, this overfitting of training data may distort training module variables. RESULTS: This study uses a 2-stage training method to solve the overfitting problem. In the training phase, to build the model, the Learning module 1 used to identify the DR and no-DR. The Learning module 2 on SMOTE synthetic datasets to identify the mild-NPDR, moderate NPDR, severe NPDR and proliferative DR classification. These two modules also used early stopping and data dividing methods to reduce overfitting by oversampling. In the test phase, we use the DIARETDB0, DIARETDB1, eOphtha, MESSIDOR, and DRIVE datasets to evaluate the performance of the training network. The prediction accuracy achieved to 85.38%, 84.27%, 85.75%, 86.73%, and 92.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the experiment, a general deep learning model for detecting DR was developed, and it could be used with all DR databases. We provided a simple method of addressing the imbalance of DR databases, and this method can be used with other medical images. BioMed Central 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8576963/ /pubmed/34749634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04005-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Chen, Ping-Nan Lee, Chia-Chiang Liang, Chang-Min Pao, Shu-I Huang, Ke-Hao Lin, Ke-Feng General deep learning model for detecting diabetic retinopathy |
title | General deep learning model for detecting diabetic retinopathy |
title_full | General deep learning model for detecting diabetic retinopathy |
title_fullStr | General deep learning model for detecting diabetic retinopathy |
title_full_unstemmed | General deep learning model for detecting diabetic retinopathy |
title_short | General deep learning model for detecting diabetic retinopathy |
title_sort | general deep learning model for detecting diabetic retinopathy |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8576963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12859-021-04005-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenpingnan generaldeeplearningmodelfordetectingdiabeticretinopathy AT leechiachiang generaldeeplearningmodelfordetectingdiabeticretinopathy AT liangchangmin generaldeeplearningmodelfordetectingdiabeticretinopathy AT paoshui generaldeeplearningmodelfordetectingdiabeticretinopathy AT huangkehao generaldeeplearningmodelfordetectingdiabeticretinopathy AT linkefeng generaldeeplearningmodelfordetectingdiabeticretinopathy |