Cargando…

Primary stability of the Activ L® intervertebral disc prosthesis in cadaver bone and comparison of the keel and spike anchoring concept

BACKGROUND: High primary stability is the key prerequisite for safe osseointegration of cementless intervertebral disc prostheses. The aim of our study was to determine the primary stability of intervertebral disc prostheses with two different anchoring concepts – keel and spike anchoring. METHODS:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Schulze Pellengahr, Christoph, Teske, Wolfram, Kapoor, Saurabh, Klein, Alexander, Wegener, Bernd, Büttner, Andreas, Lahner, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04544-7
_version_ 1784595990193373184
author von Schulze Pellengahr, Christoph
Teske, Wolfram
Kapoor, Saurabh
Klein, Alexander
Wegener, Bernd
Büttner, Andreas
Lahner, Matthias
author_facet von Schulze Pellengahr, Christoph
Teske, Wolfram
Kapoor, Saurabh
Klein, Alexander
Wegener, Bernd
Büttner, Andreas
Lahner, Matthias
author_sort von Schulze Pellengahr, Christoph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High primary stability is the key prerequisite for safe osseointegration of cementless intervertebral disc prostheses. The aim of our study was to determine the primary stability of intervertebral disc prostheses with two different anchoring concepts – keel and spike anchoring. METHODS: Ten ActivL intervertebral disc prostheses (5 x keel anchoring, 5 x spike anchoring) implanted in human cadaver lumbar spine specimens were tested in a spine movement simulator. Axial load flexion, extension, left and right bending and axial rotation motions were applied on the lumbar spine specimens through a defined three-dimensional movement program following ISO 2631 and ISO/CD 18192-1.3 standards. Tri-dimensional micromotions of the implants were measured for both anchor types and compared using Student’s T-test for significance after calculating 95 % confidence intervals. RESULTS: In the transverse axis, the keel anchoring concept showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) lower mean values of micromotions compared to the spike anchoring concept. The highest micromotion values for both types were observed in the longitudinal axis. In no case the threshold of 200 micrometers was exceeded. CONCLUSIONS: Both fixation systems fulfill the required criteria of primary stability. Independent of the selected anchorage type an immediate postoperative active mobilization doesn’t compromise the stability of the prostheses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8577002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85770022021-11-10 Primary stability of the Activ L® intervertebral disc prosthesis in cadaver bone and comparison of the keel and spike anchoring concept von Schulze Pellengahr, Christoph Teske, Wolfram Kapoor, Saurabh Klein, Alexander Wegener, Bernd Büttner, Andreas Lahner, Matthias BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: High primary stability is the key prerequisite for safe osseointegration of cementless intervertebral disc prostheses. The aim of our study was to determine the primary stability of intervertebral disc prostheses with two different anchoring concepts – keel and spike anchoring. METHODS: Ten ActivL intervertebral disc prostheses (5 x keel anchoring, 5 x spike anchoring) implanted in human cadaver lumbar spine specimens were tested in a spine movement simulator. Axial load flexion, extension, left and right bending and axial rotation motions were applied on the lumbar spine specimens through a defined three-dimensional movement program following ISO 2631 and ISO/CD 18192-1.3 standards. Tri-dimensional micromotions of the implants were measured for both anchor types and compared using Student’s T-test for significance after calculating 95 % confidence intervals. RESULTS: In the transverse axis, the keel anchoring concept showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) lower mean values of micromotions compared to the spike anchoring concept. The highest micromotion values for both types were observed in the longitudinal axis. In no case the threshold of 200 micrometers was exceeded. CONCLUSIONS: Both fixation systems fulfill the required criteria of primary stability. Independent of the selected anchorage type an immediate postoperative active mobilization doesn’t compromise the stability of the prostheses. BioMed Central 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8577002/ /pubmed/34749688 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04544-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
von Schulze Pellengahr, Christoph
Teske, Wolfram
Kapoor, Saurabh
Klein, Alexander
Wegener, Bernd
Büttner, Andreas
Lahner, Matthias
Primary stability of the Activ L® intervertebral disc prosthesis in cadaver bone and comparison of the keel and spike anchoring concept
title Primary stability of the Activ L® intervertebral disc prosthesis in cadaver bone and comparison of the keel and spike anchoring concept
title_full Primary stability of the Activ L® intervertebral disc prosthesis in cadaver bone and comparison of the keel and spike anchoring concept
title_fullStr Primary stability of the Activ L® intervertebral disc prosthesis in cadaver bone and comparison of the keel and spike anchoring concept
title_full_unstemmed Primary stability of the Activ L® intervertebral disc prosthesis in cadaver bone and comparison of the keel and spike anchoring concept
title_short Primary stability of the Activ L® intervertebral disc prosthesis in cadaver bone and comparison of the keel and spike anchoring concept
title_sort primary stability of the activ l® intervertebral disc prosthesis in cadaver bone and comparison of the keel and spike anchoring concept
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749688
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04544-7
work_keys_str_mv AT vonschulzepellengahrchristoph primarystabilityoftheactivlintervertebraldiscprosthesisincadaverboneandcomparisonofthekeelandspikeanchoringconcept
AT teskewolfram primarystabilityoftheactivlintervertebraldiscprosthesisincadaverboneandcomparisonofthekeelandspikeanchoringconcept
AT kapoorsaurabh primarystabilityoftheactivlintervertebraldiscprosthesisincadaverboneandcomparisonofthekeelandspikeanchoringconcept
AT kleinalexander primarystabilityoftheactivlintervertebraldiscprosthesisincadaverboneandcomparisonofthekeelandspikeanchoringconcept
AT wegenerbernd primarystabilityoftheactivlintervertebraldiscprosthesisincadaverboneandcomparisonofthekeelandspikeanchoringconcept
AT buttnerandreas primarystabilityoftheactivlintervertebraldiscprosthesisincadaverboneandcomparisonofthekeelandspikeanchoringconcept
AT lahnermatthias primarystabilityoftheactivlintervertebraldiscprosthesisincadaverboneandcomparisonofthekeelandspikeanchoringconcept