Cargando…

Improving on estimates of the potential relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking

BACKGROUND: Although the harm to health from electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) compared to smoked tobacco remains highly uncertain, society and governments still need to know the likely range of the relative harm to inform regulatory policies for ENDS and smoking. METHODS: We identified bi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wilson, Nick, Summers, Jennifer A., Ait Ouakrim, Driss, Hoek, Janet, Edwards, Richard, Blakely, Tony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12103-x
_version_ 1784595995449884672
author Wilson, Nick
Summers, Jennifer A.
Ait Ouakrim, Driss
Hoek, Janet
Edwards, Richard
Blakely, Tony
author_facet Wilson, Nick
Summers, Jennifer A.
Ait Ouakrim, Driss
Hoek, Janet
Edwards, Richard
Blakely, Tony
author_sort Wilson, Nick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the harm to health from electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) compared to smoked tobacco remains highly uncertain, society and governments still need to know the likely range of the relative harm to inform regulatory policies for ENDS and smoking. METHODS: We identified biomarkers with specificity of association with different disease groupings e.g., volatile organic compound (VOCs) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; and tobacco-specific N´-nitrosamines (TSNAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) for all cancers. We conducted a review of recent studies (post January 2017) that compared these biomarkers between people exclusively using ENDS and those exclusively smoking tobacco. The percentage differences in these biomarkers, weighted by study size and adjusted for acrolein from other sources, were used as a proxy for the assumed percentage difference in disease harm between ENDS and smoking. These relative differences were applied to previously modelled estimates of smoking-related health loss (in health-adjusted life-years; HALYs). RESULTS: The respective relative biomarker levels (ENDS vs smoking) were: 28% for respiratory diseases (five results, three studies); 42% for cancers (five results, four studies); and 35% for cardiovascular (seven results, four studies). When integrated with the HALY impacts by disease, the overall harm to health from ENDS was estimated to be 33% that of smoking. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis, suggests that the use of modern ENDS devices (vaping) could be a third as harmful to health as smoking in a high-income country setting. But this estimate is based on a limited number of biomarker studies and is best be considered a likely upper level of ENDS risk given potential biases in our method (i.e., the biomarkers used being correlated with more unaccounted for toxicants in smoking compared to with using ENDS). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-12103-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8577029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85770292021-11-10 Improving on estimates of the potential relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking Wilson, Nick Summers, Jennifer A. Ait Ouakrim, Driss Hoek, Janet Edwards, Richard Blakely, Tony BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Although the harm to health from electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) compared to smoked tobacco remains highly uncertain, society and governments still need to know the likely range of the relative harm to inform regulatory policies for ENDS and smoking. METHODS: We identified biomarkers with specificity of association with different disease groupings e.g., volatile organic compound (VOCs) for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; and tobacco-specific N´-nitrosamines (TSNAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) for all cancers. We conducted a review of recent studies (post January 2017) that compared these biomarkers between people exclusively using ENDS and those exclusively smoking tobacco. The percentage differences in these biomarkers, weighted by study size and adjusted for acrolein from other sources, were used as a proxy for the assumed percentage difference in disease harm between ENDS and smoking. These relative differences were applied to previously modelled estimates of smoking-related health loss (in health-adjusted life-years; HALYs). RESULTS: The respective relative biomarker levels (ENDS vs smoking) were: 28% for respiratory diseases (five results, three studies); 42% for cancers (five results, four studies); and 35% for cardiovascular (seven results, four studies). When integrated with the HALY impacts by disease, the overall harm to health from ENDS was estimated to be 33% that of smoking. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis, suggests that the use of modern ENDS devices (vaping) could be a third as harmful to health as smoking in a high-income country setting. But this estimate is based on a limited number of biomarker studies and is best be considered a likely upper level of ENDS risk given potential biases in our method (i.e., the biomarkers used being correlated with more unaccounted for toxicants in smoking compared to with using ENDS). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-12103-x. BioMed Central 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8577029/ /pubmed/34749706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12103-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wilson, Nick
Summers, Jennifer A.
Ait Ouakrim, Driss
Hoek, Janet
Edwards, Richard
Blakely, Tony
Improving on estimates of the potential relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking
title Improving on estimates of the potential relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking
title_full Improving on estimates of the potential relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking
title_fullStr Improving on estimates of the potential relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking
title_full_unstemmed Improving on estimates of the potential relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking
title_short Improving on estimates of the potential relative harm to health from using modern ENDS (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking
title_sort improving on estimates of the potential relative harm to health from using modern ends (vaping) compared to tobacco smoking
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34749706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12103-x
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonnick improvingonestimatesofthepotentialrelativeharmtohealthfromusingmodernendsvapingcomparedtotobaccosmoking
AT summersjennifera improvingonestimatesofthepotentialrelativeharmtohealthfromusingmodernendsvapingcomparedtotobaccosmoking
AT aitouakrimdriss improvingonestimatesofthepotentialrelativeharmtohealthfromusingmodernendsvapingcomparedtotobaccosmoking
AT hoekjanet improvingonestimatesofthepotentialrelativeharmtohealthfromusingmodernendsvapingcomparedtotobaccosmoking
AT edwardsrichard improvingonestimatesofthepotentialrelativeharmtohealthfromusingmodernendsvapingcomparedtotobaccosmoking
AT blakelytony improvingonestimatesofthepotentialrelativeharmtohealthfromusingmodernendsvapingcomparedtotobaccosmoking