Cargando…
Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration
The aim of the study was to find out good practices for effective air distribution inside a complex shaped asbestos enclosure and for control of pressure differences between the enclosure and the surroundings. In addition, sufficient pressure difference for asbestos containment was tested. The effec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34228094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxab041 |
_version_ | 1784596032931233792 |
---|---|
author | Kulmala, Ilpo Linnainmaa, Markku Kokkonen, Anna Heinonen, Kimmo Kanerva, Tomi Säämänen, Arto |
author_facet | Kulmala, Ilpo Linnainmaa, Markku Kokkonen, Anna Heinonen, Kimmo Kanerva, Tomi Säämänen, Arto |
author_sort | Kulmala, Ilpo |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the study was to find out good practices for effective air distribution inside a complex shaped asbestos enclosure and for control of pressure differences between the enclosure and the surroundings. In addition, sufficient pressure difference for asbestos containment was tested. The effect of air distribution was studied in laboratory conditions by constructing an L-shaped asbestos enclosure and connecting it to a negative pressure unit. The efficiency of six different ventilation configurations was compared using a tracer decay method and the local air change indexes as the performance indicator. The sufficient negative pressure for containment was assessed by simulating person traffic to and from the enclosure and recording the pressure difference continuously. The effect of a pressure controller unit in maintaining the target pressure difference was also tested by simulating filter loadings of the negative pressure unit causing changes in the air flow rate. The results showed that high nominal air change rates alone do not guarantee good air distribution. Effective air distribution within an asbestos enclosure can be arranged by locating additional air supply openings far away from the air exhaustion point, using recirculation air with a pressure controller, or extending the exhaust location to the poorly ventilated areas. A pressure difference of at least −10 Pa is recommended to ensure a sufficient margin of safety in practical situations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8577233 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85772332021-11-10 Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration Kulmala, Ilpo Linnainmaa, Markku Kokkonen, Anna Heinonen, Kimmo Kanerva, Tomi Säämänen, Arto Ann Work Expo Health Original Articles The aim of the study was to find out good practices for effective air distribution inside a complex shaped asbestos enclosure and for control of pressure differences between the enclosure and the surroundings. In addition, sufficient pressure difference for asbestos containment was tested. The effect of air distribution was studied in laboratory conditions by constructing an L-shaped asbestos enclosure and connecting it to a negative pressure unit. The efficiency of six different ventilation configurations was compared using a tracer decay method and the local air change indexes as the performance indicator. The sufficient negative pressure for containment was assessed by simulating person traffic to and from the enclosure and recording the pressure difference continuously. The effect of a pressure controller unit in maintaining the target pressure difference was also tested by simulating filter loadings of the negative pressure unit causing changes in the air flow rate. The results showed that high nominal air change rates alone do not guarantee good air distribution. Effective air distribution within an asbestos enclosure can be arranged by locating additional air supply openings far away from the air exhaustion point, using recirculation air with a pressure controller, or extending the exhaust location to the poorly ventilated areas. A pressure difference of at least −10 Pa is recommended to ensure a sufficient margin of safety in practical situations. Oxford University Press 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8577233/ /pubmed/34228094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxab041 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Kulmala, Ilpo Linnainmaa, Markku Kokkonen, Anna Heinonen, Kimmo Kanerva, Tomi Säämänen, Arto Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration |
title | Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration |
title_full | Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration |
title_fullStr | Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration |
title_short | Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration |
title_sort | performance of asbestos enclosure ventilation: laboratory evaluation of complex configuration |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577233/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34228094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxab041 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kulmalailpo performanceofasbestosenclosureventilationlaboratoryevaluationofcomplexconfiguration AT linnainmaamarkku performanceofasbestosenclosureventilationlaboratoryevaluationofcomplexconfiguration AT kokkonenanna performanceofasbestosenclosureventilationlaboratoryevaluationofcomplexconfiguration AT heinonenkimmo performanceofasbestosenclosureventilationlaboratoryevaluationofcomplexconfiguration AT kanervatomi performanceofasbestosenclosureventilationlaboratoryevaluationofcomplexconfiguration AT saamanenarto performanceofasbestosenclosureventilationlaboratoryevaluationofcomplexconfiguration |