Cargando…

Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration

The aim of the study was to find out good practices for effective air distribution inside a complex shaped asbestos enclosure and for control of pressure differences between the enclosure and the surroundings. In addition, sufficient pressure difference for asbestos containment was tested. The effec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kulmala, Ilpo, Linnainmaa, Markku, Kokkonen, Anna, Heinonen, Kimmo, Kanerva, Tomi, Säämänen, Arto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34228094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxab041
_version_ 1784596032931233792
author Kulmala, Ilpo
Linnainmaa, Markku
Kokkonen, Anna
Heinonen, Kimmo
Kanerva, Tomi
Säämänen, Arto
author_facet Kulmala, Ilpo
Linnainmaa, Markku
Kokkonen, Anna
Heinonen, Kimmo
Kanerva, Tomi
Säämänen, Arto
author_sort Kulmala, Ilpo
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to find out good practices for effective air distribution inside a complex shaped asbestos enclosure and for control of pressure differences between the enclosure and the surroundings. In addition, sufficient pressure difference for asbestos containment was tested. The effect of air distribution was studied in laboratory conditions by constructing an L-shaped asbestos enclosure and connecting it to a negative pressure unit. The efficiency of six different ventilation configurations was compared using a tracer decay method and the local air change indexes as the performance indicator. The sufficient negative pressure for containment was assessed by simulating person traffic to and from the enclosure and recording the pressure difference continuously. The effect of a pressure controller unit in maintaining the target pressure difference was also tested by simulating filter loadings of the negative pressure unit causing changes in the air flow rate. The results showed that high nominal air change rates alone do not guarantee good air distribution. Effective air distribution within an asbestos enclosure can be arranged by locating additional air supply openings far away from the air exhaustion point, using recirculation air with a pressure controller, or extending the exhaust location to the poorly ventilated areas. A pressure difference of at least −10 Pa is recommended to ensure a sufficient margin of safety in practical situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8577233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85772332021-11-10 Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration Kulmala, Ilpo Linnainmaa, Markku Kokkonen, Anna Heinonen, Kimmo Kanerva, Tomi Säämänen, Arto Ann Work Expo Health Original Articles The aim of the study was to find out good practices for effective air distribution inside a complex shaped asbestos enclosure and for control of pressure differences between the enclosure and the surroundings. In addition, sufficient pressure difference for asbestos containment was tested. The effect of air distribution was studied in laboratory conditions by constructing an L-shaped asbestos enclosure and connecting it to a negative pressure unit. The efficiency of six different ventilation configurations was compared using a tracer decay method and the local air change indexes as the performance indicator. The sufficient negative pressure for containment was assessed by simulating person traffic to and from the enclosure and recording the pressure difference continuously. The effect of a pressure controller unit in maintaining the target pressure difference was also tested by simulating filter loadings of the negative pressure unit causing changes in the air flow rate. The results showed that high nominal air change rates alone do not guarantee good air distribution. Effective air distribution within an asbestos enclosure can be arranged by locating additional air supply openings far away from the air exhaustion point, using recirculation air with a pressure controller, or extending the exhaust location to the poorly ventilated areas. A pressure difference of at least −10 Pa is recommended to ensure a sufficient margin of safety in practical situations. Oxford University Press 2021-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8577233/ /pubmed/34228094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxab041 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Kulmala, Ilpo
Linnainmaa, Markku
Kokkonen, Anna
Heinonen, Kimmo
Kanerva, Tomi
Säämänen, Arto
Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration
title Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration
title_full Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration
title_fullStr Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration
title_full_unstemmed Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration
title_short Performance of Asbestos Enclosure Ventilation: Laboratory Evaluation of Complex Configuration
title_sort performance of asbestos enclosure ventilation: laboratory evaluation of complex configuration
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34228094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxab041
work_keys_str_mv AT kulmalailpo performanceofasbestosenclosureventilationlaboratoryevaluationofcomplexconfiguration
AT linnainmaamarkku performanceofasbestosenclosureventilationlaboratoryevaluationofcomplexconfiguration
AT kokkonenanna performanceofasbestosenclosureventilationlaboratoryevaluationofcomplexconfiguration
AT heinonenkimmo performanceofasbestosenclosureventilationlaboratoryevaluationofcomplexconfiguration
AT kanervatomi performanceofasbestosenclosureventilationlaboratoryevaluationofcomplexconfiguration
AT saamanenarto performanceofasbestosenclosureventilationlaboratoryevaluationofcomplexconfiguration