Cargando…
Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review
OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and appraise economic evaluations of vision screening to detect vision impairment in children. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted on seven electronic databases, grey literature, and websites of agencies conducting health technology assessments. Studies were included...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34755325 http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00572-x |
_version_ | 1784596056513708032 |
---|---|
author | Asare, Afua O. Wong, Agnes M. F. Maurer, Daphne Kulandaivelu, Yalinie Saunders, Natasha Ungar, Wendy J. |
author_facet | Asare, Afua O. Wong, Agnes M. F. Maurer, Daphne Kulandaivelu, Yalinie Saunders, Natasha Ungar, Wendy J. |
author_sort | Asare, Afua O. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and appraise economic evaluations of vision screening to detect vision impairment in children. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted on seven electronic databases, grey literature, and websites of agencies conducting health technology assessments. Studies were included if they (1) were full, comparative economic evaluations that used cost-utility, cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, cost-consequence, or cost-analysis methods; (2) described screening services designed to detect amblyopia, strabismus, or uncorrected refractive errors in children under 6 years of age; and (3) published after 1994. High-quality studies were synthesized descriptively. Currencies were reported in 2019 Canadian dollars. Quality was assessed with the Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire (PQAQ). RESULTS: Vision screening services were conducted by paid staff, volunteers, or health care professionals in schools or clinics. Thirteen studies were published from five countries: China (n = 1), United States (n = 4), United Kingdom (n = 1), Canada (n = 1), and Germany (n = 6). Analytical techniques included cost-utility/cost-effectiveness combination (n = 2), cost-effectiveness analysis (n = 7), cost-utility analysis (n = 1), cost-benefit analysis (n = 1), cost-consequence analysis (n = 1), and cost analysis (n = 1). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from C$1,056 to C$151,274 per additional case detected/prevented and from C$9,429 to C$30,254,703 per additional QALY gained, depending on the type of screening service and comparator. Six studies were determined to be of high quality. CONCLUSION: Vision screening to detect amblyopia for young children may be cost-effective compared with no screening if amblyopia reduced quality of life. Studies varied significantly in the type of screening services and comparators used. Methodological limitations were common. Future studies would be aided immensely by prospective studies on the impact of amblyopia on the health-related quality of life of young children and guidelines on the effective conduct of vision screening. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.17269/s41997-021-00572-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8577413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85774132021-11-10 Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review Asare, Afua O. Wong, Agnes M. F. Maurer, Daphne Kulandaivelu, Yalinie Saunders, Natasha Ungar, Wendy J. Can J Public Health Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and appraise economic evaluations of vision screening to detect vision impairment in children. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted on seven electronic databases, grey literature, and websites of agencies conducting health technology assessments. Studies were included if they (1) were full, comparative economic evaluations that used cost-utility, cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, cost-consequence, or cost-analysis methods; (2) described screening services designed to detect amblyopia, strabismus, or uncorrected refractive errors in children under 6 years of age; and (3) published after 1994. High-quality studies were synthesized descriptively. Currencies were reported in 2019 Canadian dollars. Quality was assessed with the Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire (PQAQ). RESULTS: Vision screening services were conducted by paid staff, volunteers, or health care professionals in schools or clinics. Thirteen studies were published from five countries: China (n = 1), United States (n = 4), United Kingdom (n = 1), Canada (n = 1), and Germany (n = 6). Analytical techniques included cost-utility/cost-effectiveness combination (n = 2), cost-effectiveness analysis (n = 7), cost-utility analysis (n = 1), cost-benefit analysis (n = 1), cost-consequence analysis (n = 1), and cost analysis (n = 1). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from C$1,056 to C$151,274 per additional case detected/prevented and from C$9,429 to C$30,254,703 per additional QALY gained, depending on the type of screening service and comparator. Six studies were determined to be of high quality. CONCLUSION: Vision screening to detect amblyopia for young children may be cost-effective compared with no screening if amblyopia reduced quality of life. Studies varied significantly in the type of screening services and comparators used. Methodological limitations were common. Future studies would be aided immensely by prospective studies on the impact of amblyopia on the health-related quality of life of young children and guidelines on the effective conduct of vision screening. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.17269/s41997-021-00572-x. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8577413/ /pubmed/34755325 http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00572-x Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive license to The Canadian Public Health Association 2021 |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Asare, Afua O. Wong, Agnes M. F. Maurer, Daphne Kulandaivelu, Yalinie Saunders, Natasha Ungar, Wendy J. Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review |
title | Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review |
title_full | Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review |
title_short | Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review |
title_sort | economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34755325 http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00572-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asareafuao economicevaluationsofvisionscreeningtodetectamblyopiaandrefractiveerrorsinchildrenasystematicreview AT wongagnesmf economicevaluationsofvisionscreeningtodetectamblyopiaandrefractiveerrorsinchildrenasystematicreview AT maurerdaphne economicevaluationsofvisionscreeningtodetectamblyopiaandrefractiveerrorsinchildrenasystematicreview AT kulandaiveluyalinie economicevaluationsofvisionscreeningtodetectamblyopiaandrefractiveerrorsinchildrenasystematicreview AT saundersnatasha economicevaluationsofvisionscreeningtodetectamblyopiaandrefractiveerrorsinchildrenasystematicreview AT ungarwendyj economicevaluationsofvisionscreeningtodetectamblyopiaandrefractiveerrorsinchildrenasystematicreview |