Cargando…

Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and appraise economic evaluations of vision screening to detect vision impairment in children. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted on seven electronic databases, grey literature, and websites of agencies conducting health technology assessments. Studies were included...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Asare, Afua O., Wong, Agnes M. F., Maurer, Daphne, Kulandaivelu, Yalinie, Saunders, Natasha, Ungar, Wendy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34755325
http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00572-x
_version_ 1784596056513708032
author Asare, Afua O.
Wong, Agnes M. F.
Maurer, Daphne
Kulandaivelu, Yalinie
Saunders, Natasha
Ungar, Wendy J.
author_facet Asare, Afua O.
Wong, Agnes M. F.
Maurer, Daphne
Kulandaivelu, Yalinie
Saunders, Natasha
Ungar, Wendy J.
author_sort Asare, Afua O.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and appraise economic evaluations of vision screening to detect vision impairment in children. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted on seven electronic databases, grey literature, and websites of agencies conducting health technology assessments. Studies were included if they (1) were full, comparative economic evaluations that used cost-utility, cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, cost-consequence, or cost-analysis methods; (2) described screening services designed to detect amblyopia, strabismus, or uncorrected refractive errors in children under 6 years of age; and (3) published after 1994. High-quality studies were synthesized descriptively. Currencies were reported in 2019 Canadian dollars. Quality was assessed with the Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire (PQAQ). RESULTS: Vision screening services were conducted by paid staff, volunteers, or health care professionals in schools or clinics. Thirteen studies were published from five countries: China (n = 1), United States (n = 4), United Kingdom (n = 1), Canada (n = 1), and Germany (n = 6). Analytical techniques included cost-utility/cost-effectiveness combination (n = 2), cost-effectiveness analysis (n = 7), cost-utility analysis (n = 1), cost-benefit analysis (n = 1), cost-consequence analysis (n = 1), and cost analysis (n = 1). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from C$1,056 to C$151,274 per additional case detected/prevented and from C$9,429 to C$30,254,703 per additional QALY gained, depending on the type of screening service and comparator. Six studies were determined to be of high quality. CONCLUSION: Vision screening to detect amblyopia for young children may be cost-effective compared with no screening if amblyopia reduced quality of life. Studies varied significantly in the type of screening services and comparators used. Methodological limitations were common. Future studies would be aided immensely by prospective studies on the impact of amblyopia on the health-related quality of life of young children and guidelines on the effective conduct of vision screening. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.17269/s41997-021-00572-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8577413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85774132021-11-10 Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review Asare, Afua O. Wong, Agnes M. F. Maurer, Daphne Kulandaivelu, Yalinie Saunders, Natasha Ungar, Wendy J. Can J Public Health Systematic Review OBJECTIVE: To synthesize and appraise economic evaluations of vision screening to detect vision impairment in children. METHODS: Literature searches were conducted on seven electronic databases, grey literature, and websites of agencies conducting health technology assessments. Studies were included if they (1) were full, comparative economic evaluations that used cost-utility, cost-benefit, cost-effectiveness, cost-consequence, or cost-analysis methods; (2) described screening services designed to detect amblyopia, strabismus, or uncorrected refractive errors in children under 6 years of age; and (3) published after 1994. High-quality studies were synthesized descriptively. Currencies were reported in 2019 Canadian dollars. Quality was assessed with the Pediatric Quality Appraisal Questionnaire (PQAQ). RESULTS: Vision screening services were conducted by paid staff, volunteers, or health care professionals in schools or clinics. Thirteen studies were published from five countries: China (n = 1), United States (n = 4), United Kingdom (n = 1), Canada (n = 1), and Germany (n = 6). Analytical techniques included cost-utility/cost-effectiveness combination (n = 2), cost-effectiveness analysis (n = 7), cost-utility analysis (n = 1), cost-benefit analysis (n = 1), cost-consequence analysis (n = 1), and cost analysis (n = 1). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from C$1,056 to C$151,274 per additional case detected/prevented and from C$9,429 to C$30,254,703 per additional QALY gained, depending on the type of screening service and comparator. Six studies were determined to be of high quality. CONCLUSION: Vision screening to detect amblyopia for young children may be cost-effective compared with no screening if amblyopia reduced quality of life. Studies varied significantly in the type of screening services and comparators used. Methodological limitations were common. Future studies would be aided immensely by prospective studies on the impact of amblyopia on the health-related quality of life of young children and guidelines on the effective conduct of vision screening. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.17269/s41997-021-00572-x. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8577413/ /pubmed/34755325 http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00572-x Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive license to The Canadian Public Health Association 2021
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Asare, Afua O.
Wong, Agnes M. F.
Maurer, Daphne
Kulandaivelu, Yalinie
Saunders, Natasha
Ungar, Wendy J.
Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review
title Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review
title_full Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review
title_fullStr Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review
title_short Economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review
title_sort economic evaluations of vision screening to detect amblyopia and refractive errors in children: a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34755325
http://dx.doi.org/10.17269/s41997-021-00572-x
work_keys_str_mv AT asareafuao economicevaluationsofvisionscreeningtodetectamblyopiaandrefractiveerrorsinchildrenasystematicreview
AT wongagnesmf economicevaluationsofvisionscreeningtodetectamblyopiaandrefractiveerrorsinchildrenasystematicreview
AT maurerdaphne economicevaluationsofvisionscreeningtodetectamblyopiaandrefractiveerrorsinchildrenasystematicreview
AT kulandaiveluyalinie economicevaluationsofvisionscreeningtodetectamblyopiaandrefractiveerrorsinchildrenasystematicreview
AT saundersnatasha economicevaluationsofvisionscreeningtodetectamblyopiaandrefractiveerrorsinchildrenasystematicreview
AT ungarwendyj economicevaluationsofvisionscreeningtodetectamblyopiaandrefractiveerrorsinchildrenasystematicreview