Cargando…

A randomized phase II trial of efficacy and safety of the immunotherapy ALECSAT as an adjunct to radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need for effective treatments against glioblastoma (GBM). In this trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of an adoptive cell-based immunotherapy. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed GBM were recruited at 4 study sites in Sweden. The patients were randomized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Werlenius, Katja, Stragliotto, Giuseppe, Strandeus, Michael, Blomstrand, Malin, Carén, Helena, Jakola, Asgeir S, Rydenhag, Bertil, Dyregaard, Dorte, Dzhandzhugazyan, Karine N, Kirkin, Alexei F, Raida, Martin K, Smits, Anja, Kinhult, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577524/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab156
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need for effective treatments against glioblastoma (GBM). In this trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of an adoptive cell-based immunotherapy. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed GBM were recruited at 4 study sites in Sweden. The patients were randomized 1:2 to receive either radiotherapy (RT), 60 Gy/30 fractions, with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) only, or RT and TMZ with the addition of Autologous Lymphoid Effector Cells Specific Against Tumor (ALECSAT) in an open-label phase II trial. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were survival and safety of ALECSAT. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were randomized to either standard of care (SOC) with RT and TMZ alone (n = 22) or SOC with ALECSAT (n = 40). Median age was 57 years (range 38–69), 95% of the patients were in good performance status (WHO 0–1). There was no significant difference between the study arms (SOC vs ALECSAT + SOC) in PFS (7.9 vs 7.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–2.36; P = .42) or in median overall survival (OS) (18.3 vs 19.2 months; HR 1.16, 95% CI 0.58–2.31; P = .67). The treatment groups were balanced in terms of serious adverse events (52.4% vs 52.5%), but adverse events ≥grade 3 were more common in the experimental arm (81.0% vs 92.5%). CONCLUSION: Addition of ALECSAT immunotherapy to standard treatment with radiochemotherapy was well tolerated but did not improve PFS or OS for patients with newly diagnosed GBM.