Cargando…
No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder
Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with impaired decision making, yet few studies have adopted paradigms from behavioral economics to decompose which, if any, aspects of decision making may be impacted. This may be particularly relevant for decision-making processes relevant to known difficulties w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34752459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258360 |
_version_ | 1784596121785466880 |
---|---|
author | Anderson, Zachary Fairley, Kim Villanueva, Cynthia M. Carter, R. McKell Gruber, June |
author_facet | Anderson, Zachary Fairley, Kim Villanueva, Cynthia M. Carter, R. McKell Gruber, June |
author_sort | Anderson, Zachary |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with impaired decision making, yet few studies have adopted paradigms from behavioral economics to decompose which, if any, aspects of decision making may be impacted. This may be particularly relevant for decision-making processes relevant to known difficulties with emotive dysfunction and corresponding reward dysregulation in BD. Participants with bipolar I disorder (BD; n = 44) and non-psychiatric healthy controls (CTL; n = 28) completed three well-validated behavioral economics decision making tasks via a remote-based survey, including loss aversion and framing effects, that examined sensitivity to probabilities and potential gains and losses in monetary and non-monetary domains. Consistent with past work, we found evidence of moderate loss aversion and framing effects across all participants. No group differences were found in any of the measures of loss aversion or framing effects. We report no group differences between bipolar and non-psychiatric groups with respect to loss aversion and framing effects using a remote-based survey approach. These results provide a framework future studies to explore similar tasks in clinical populations and suggest the context and degree to which decision making is altered in BD may be rooted in a more complex cognitive mechanism that warrants future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8577741 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85777412021-11-10 No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder Anderson, Zachary Fairley, Kim Villanueva, Cynthia M. Carter, R. McKell Gruber, June PLoS One Research Article Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with impaired decision making, yet few studies have adopted paradigms from behavioral economics to decompose which, if any, aspects of decision making may be impacted. This may be particularly relevant for decision-making processes relevant to known difficulties with emotive dysfunction and corresponding reward dysregulation in BD. Participants with bipolar I disorder (BD; n = 44) and non-psychiatric healthy controls (CTL; n = 28) completed three well-validated behavioral economics decision making tasks via a remote-based survey, including loss aversion and framing effects, that examined sensitivity to probabilities and potential gains and losses in monetary and non-monetary domains. Consistent with past work, we found evidence of moderate loss aversion and framing effects across all participants. No group differences were found in any of the measures of loss aversion or framing effects. We report no group differences between bipolar and non-psychiatric groups with respect to loss aversion and framing effects using a remote-based survey approach. These results provide a framework future studies to explore similar tasks in clinical populations and suggest the context and degree to which decision making is altered in BD may be rooted in a more complex cognitive mechanism that warrants future research. Public Library of Science 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8577741/ /pubmed/34752459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258360 Text en © 2021 Anderson et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Anderson, Zachary Fairley, Kim Villanueva, Cynthia M. Carter, R. McKell Gruber, June No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder |
title | No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder |
title_full | No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder |
title_fullStr | No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder |
title_short | No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder |
title_sort | no group differences in traditional economics measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar i disorder |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577741/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34752459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258360 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andersonzachary nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder AT fairleykim nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder AT villanuevacynthiam nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder AT carterrmckell nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder AT gruberjune nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder |