Cargando…

No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder

Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with impaired decision making, yet few studies have adopted paradigms from behavioral economics to decompose which, if any, aspects of decision making may be impacted. This may be particularly relevant for decision-making processes relevant to known difficulties w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anderson, Zachary, Fairley, Kim, Villanueva, Cynthia M., Carter, R. McKell, Gruber, June
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34752459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258360
_version_ 1784596121785466880
author Anderson, Zachary
Fairley, Kim
Villanueva, Cynthia M.
Carter, R. McKell
Gruber, June
author_facet Anderson, Zachary
Fairley, Kim
Villanueva, Cynthia M.
Carter, R. McKell
Gruber, June
author_sort Anderson, Zachary
collection PubMed
description Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with impaired decision making, yet few studies have adopted paradigms from behavioral economics to decompose which, if any, aspects of decision making may be impacted. This may be particularly relevant for decision-making processes relevant to known difficulties with emotive dysfunction and corresponding reward dysregulation in BD. Participants with bipolar I disorder (BD; n = 44) and non-psychiatric healthy controls (CTL; n = 28) completed three well-validated behavioral economics decision making tasks via a remote-based survey, including loss aversion and framing effects, that examined sensitivity to probabilities and potential gains and losses in monetary and non-monetary domains. Consistent with past work, we found evidence of moderate loss aversion and framing effects across all participants. No group differences were found in any of the measures of loss aversion or framing effects. We report no group differences between bipolar and non-psychiatric groups with respect to loss aversion and framing effects using a remote-based survey approach. These results provide a framework future studies to explore similar tasks in clinical populations and suggest the context and degree to which decision making is altered in BD may be rooted in a more complex cognitive mechanism that warrants future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8577741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85777412021-11-10 No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder Anderson, Zachary Fairley, Kim Villanueva, Cynthia M. Carter, R. McKell Gruber, June PLoS One Research Article Bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with impaired decision making, yet few studies have adopted paradigms from behavioral economics to decompose which, if any, aspects of decision making may be impacted. This may be particularly relevant for decision-making processes relevant to known difficulties with emotive dysfunction and corresponding reward dysregulation in BD. Participants with bipolar I disorder (BD; n = 44) and non-psychiatric healthy controls (CTL; n = 28) completed three well-validated behavioral economics decision making tasks via a remote-based survey, including loss aversion and framing effects, that examined sensitivity to probabilities and potential gains and losses in monetary and non-monetary domains. Consistent with past work, we found evidence of moderate loss aversion and framing effects across all participants. No group differences were found in any of the measures of loss aversion or framing effects. We report no group differences between bipolar and non-psychiatric groups with respect to loss aversion and framing effects using a remote-based survey approach. These results provide a framework future studies to explore similar tasks in clinical populations and suggest the context and degree to which decision making is altered in BD may be rooted in a more complex cognitive mechanism that warrants future research. Public Library of Science 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8577741/ /pubmed/34752459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258360 Text en © 2021 Anderson et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Anderson, Zachary
Fairley, Kim
Villanueva, Cynthia M.
Carter, R. McKell
Gruber, June
No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder
title No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder
title_full No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder
title_fullStr No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder
title_full_unstemmed No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder
title_short No group differences in Traditional Economics Measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar I disorder
title_sort no group differences in traditional economics measures of loss aversion and framing effects in bipolar i disorder
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34752459
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0258360
work_keys_str_mv AT andersonzachary nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder
AT fairleykim nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder
AT villanuevacynthiam nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder
AT carterrmckell nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder
AT gruberjune nogroupdifferencesintraditionaleconomicsmeasuresoflossaversionandframingeffectsinbipolaridisorder