Cargando…

Prioritizing supports and services to help older adults age in place: A Delphi study comparing the perspectives of family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders

BACKGROUND: Aging in place (AIP) is a policy strategy designed to help older adults remain in their community. While planners internationally have modified aspects of the older adult care continuum (e.g., home care, assisted living, nursing homes) to facilitate AIP, further improvements to community...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campbell, Megan, Stewart, Tara, Brunkert, Thekla, Campbell-Enns, Heather, Gruneir, Andrea, Halas, Gayle, Hoben, Matthias, Scott, Erin, Wagg, Adrian, Doupe, Malcolm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34752475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259387
_version_ 1784596127552634880
author Campbell, Megan
Stewart, Tara
Brunkert, Thekla
Campbell-Enns, Heather
Gruneir, Andrea
Halas, Gayle
Hoben, Matthias
Scott, Erin
Wagg, Adrian
Doupe, Malcolm
author_facet Campbell, Megan
Stewart, Tara
Brunkert, Thekla
Campbell-Enns, Heather
Gruneir, Andrea
Halas, Gayle
Hoben, Matthias
Scott, Erin
Wagg, Adrian
Doupe, Malcolm
author_sort Campbell, Megan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Aging in place (AIP) is a policy strategy designed to help older adults remain in their community. While planners internationally have modified aspects of the older adult care continuum (e.g., home care, assisted living, nursing homes) to facilitate AIP, further improvements to community-based supports and services are also required. This study compared and constrasted the community-based factors (e.g., supports, services and personal strategies or characteristics) that family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders (i.e., planners/providers) view as most important to help older adults successfully AIP. METHODS: An initial list of factors shown to influence AIP was created from the academic literature. These factors were used to develop a Delphi survey implemented separately on care partners and healthcare stakeholders. Respondents rated the importance of each factor using a 10-point Likert Scale (1 = not important; 10 = absolutely critical). Consensus in each group was defined when at least 80% of participants scored a factor ≥8 (“very important”), with an interquartile range ≤2. Respondents suggested additional factors during Delphi round one. RESULTS: Care partners (N = 25) and healthcare stakeholders (N = 36) completed two and three Delphi rounds, respectively. These groups independently agreed that the following 3 (out of 27) factors were very important to help older adults age in place: keeping one’s home safe, maintaining strong inter-personal relationships, and coordinating care across formal providers. While healthcare stakeholders did not reach consensus on other factors, care partners agreed that 7 additional factors (e.g., access to affordable housing, having mental health programs) were important for AIP. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to healthcare stakeholders, care partners felt that more and diverse community-based factors are important to support older adults to successfully AIP. Future research should replicate these findings in other jurisdictions, examine the availability and accessibility of the priority factors, and develop sustainable solutions to enhance their effectiveness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8577765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85777652021-11-10 Prioritizing supports and services to help older adults age in place: A Delphi study comparing the perspectives of family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders Campbell, Megan Stewart, Tara Brunkert, Thekla Campbell-Enns, Heather Gruneir, Andrea Halas, Gayle Hoben, Matthias Scott, Erin Wagg, Adrian Doupe, Malcolm PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Aging in place (AIP) is a policy strategy designed to help older adults remain in their community. While planners internationally have modified aspects of the older adult care continuum (e.g., home care, assisted living, nursing homes) to facilitate AIP, further improvements to community-based supports and services are also required. This study compared and constrasted the community-based factors (e.g., supports, services and personal strategies or characteristics) that family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders (i.e., planners/providers) view as most important to help older adults successfully AIP. METHODS: An initial list of factors shown to influence AIP was created from the academic literature. These factors were used to develop a Delphi survey implemented separately on care partners and healthcare stakeholders. Respondents rated the importance of each factor using a 10-point Likert Scale (1 = not important; 10 = absolutely critical). Consensus in each group was defined when at least 80% of participants scored a factor ≥8 (“very important”), with an interquartile range ≤2. Respondents suggested additional factors during Delphi round one. RESULTS: Care partners (N = 25) and healthcare stakeholders (N = 36) completed two and three Delphi rounds, respectively. These groups independently agreed that the following 3 (out of 27) factors were very important to help older adults age in place: keeping one’s home safe, maintaining strong inter-personal relationships, and coordinating care across formal providers. While healthcare stakeholders did not reach consensus on other factors, care partners agreed that 7 additional factors (e.g., access to affordable housing, having mental health programs) were important for AIP. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to healthcare stakeholders, care partners felt that more and diverse community-based factors are important to support older adults to successfully AIP. Future research should replicate these findings in other jurisdictions, examine the availability and accessibility of the priority factors, and develop sustainable solutions to enhance their effectiveness. Public Library of Science 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8577765/ /pubmed/34752475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259387 Text en © 2021 Campbell et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Campbell, Megan
Stewart, Tara
Brunkert, Thekla
Campbell-Enns, Heather
Gruneir, Andrea
Halas, Gayle
Hoben, Matthias
Scott, Erin
Wagg, Adrian
Doupe, Malcolm
Prioritizing supports and services to help older adults age in place: A Delphi study comparing the perspectives of family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders
title Prioritizing supports and services to help older adults age in place: A Delphi study comparing the perspectives of family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders
title_full Prioritizing supports and services to help older adults age in place: A Delphi study comparing the perspectives of family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders
title_fullStr Prioritizing supports and services to help older adults age in place: A Delphi study comparing the perspectives of family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders
title_full_unstemmed Prioritizing supports and services to help older adults age in place: A Delphi study comparing the perspectives of family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders
title_short Prioritizing supports and services to help older adults age in place: A Delphi study comparing the perspectives of family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders
title_sort prioritizing supports and services to help older adults age in place: a delphi study comparing the perspectives of family/friend care partners and healthcare stakeholders
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34752475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259387
work_keys_str_mv AT campbellmegan prioritizingsupportsandservicestohelpolderadultsageinplaceadelphistudycomparingtheperspectivesoffamilyfriendcarepartnersandhealthcarestakeholders
AT stewarttara prioritizingsupportsandservicestohelpolderadultsageinplaceadelphistudycomparingtheperspectivesoffamilyfriendcarepartnersandhealthcarestakeholders
AT brunkertthekla prioritizingsupportsandservicestohelpolderadultsageinplaceadelphistudycomparingtheperspectivesoffamilyfriendcarepartnersandhealthcarestakeholders
AT campbellennsheather prioritizingsupportsandservicestohelpolderadultsageinplaceadelphistudycomparingtheperspectivesoffamilyfriendcarepartnersandhealthcarestakeholders
AT gruneirandrea prioritizingsupportsandservicestohelpolderadultsageinplaceadelphistudycomparingtheperspectivesoffamilyfriendcarepartnersandhealthcarestakeholders
AT halasgayle prioritizingsupportsandservicestohelpolderadultsageinplaceadelphistudycomparingtheperspectivesoffamilyfriendcarepartnersandhealthcarestakeholders
AT hobenmatthias prioritizingsupportsandservicestohelpolderadultsageinplaceadelphistudycomparingtheperspectivesoffamilyfriendcarepartnersandhealthcarestakeholders
AT scotterin prioritizingsupportsandservicestohelpolderadultsageinplaceadelphistudycomparingtheperspectivesoffamilyfriendcarepartnersandhealthcarestakeholders
AT waggadrian prioritizingsupportsandservicestohelpolderadultsageinplaceadelphistudycomparingtheperspectivesoffamilyfriendcarepartnersandhealthcarestakeholders
AT doupemalcolm prioritizingsupportsandservicestohelpolderadultsageinplaceadelphistudycomparingtheperspectivesoffamilyfriendcarepartnersandhealthcarestakeholders