Cargando…

Automatic Forecasting of Radiology Examination Volume Trends for Optimal Resource Planning and Allocation

The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the Prophet forecasting procedure, part of the Facebook open-source Artificial Intelligence portfolio, for forecasting variations in radiological examination volumes. Daily CT and MRI examination volumes from our institution were extracted from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Becker, Anton S., Erinjeri, Joseph P., Chaim, Joshua, Kastango, Nicholas, Elnajjar, Pierre, Hricak, Hedvig, Vargas, H. Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34755249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00532-4
_version_ 1784596148335411200
author Becker, Anton S.
Erinjeri, Joseph P.
Chaim, Joshua
Kastango, Nicholas
Elnajjar, Pierre
Hricak, Hedvig
Vargas, H. Alberto
author_facet Becker, Anton S.
Erinjeri, Joseph P.
Chaim, Joshua
Kastango, Nicholas
Elnajjar, Pierre
Hricak, Hedvig
Vargas, H. Alberto
author_sort Becker, Anton S.
collection PubMed
description The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the Prophet forecasting procedure, part of the Facebook open-source Artificial Intelligence portfolio, for forecasting variations in radiological examination volumes. Daily CT and MRI examination volumes from our institution were extracted from the radiology information system (RIS) database. Data from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, was used for training the Prophet algorithm, and data from January 2020 was used for validation. Algorithm performance was then evaluated prospectively in February and August 2020. Total error and mean error per day were evaluated, and computational time was logged using different Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples. Data from 610,570 examinations were used for training; the majority were CTs (82.3%). During retrospective testing, prediction error was reduced from 19 to < 1 per day in CT (total 589 to 17) and from 5 to < 1 per day (total 144 to 27) in MRI by fine-tuning the Prophet procedure. Prospective prediction error in February was 11 per day in CT (9934 predicted, 9667 actual) and 1 per day in MRI (2484 predicted, 2457 actual) and was significantly better than manual weekly predictions (p = 0.001). Inference with MCMC added no substantial improvements while vastly increasing computational time. Prophet accurately models weekly, seasonal, and overall trends paving the way for optimal resource allocation for radiology exam acquisition and interpretation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8577854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85778542021-11-10 Automatic Forecasting of Radiology Examination Volume Trends for Optimal Resource Planning and Allocation Becker, Anton S. Erinjeri, Joseph P. Chaim, Joshua Kastango, Nicholas Elnajjar, Pierre Hricak, Hedvig Vargas, H. Alberto J Digit Imaging Article The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the Prophet forecasting procedure, part of the Facebook open-source Artificial Intelligence portfolio, for forecasting variations in radiological examination volumes. Daily CT and MRI examination volumes from our institution were extracted from the radiology information system (RIS) database. Data from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, was used for training the Prophet algorithm, and data from January 2020 was used for validation. Algorithm performance was then evaluated prospectively in February and August 2020. Total error and mean error per day were evaluated, and computational time was logged using different Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) samples. Data from 610,570 examinations were used for training; the majority were CTs (82.3%). During retrospective testing, prediction error was reduced from 19 to < 1 per day in CT (total 589 to 17) and from 5 to < 1 per day (total 144 to 27) in MRI by fine-tuning the Prophet procedure. Prospective prediction error in February was 11 per day in CT (9934 predicted, 9667 actual) and 1 per day in MRI (2484 predicted, 2457 actual) and was significantly better than manual weekly predictions (p = 0.001). Inference with MCMC added no substantial improvements while vastly increasing computational time. Prophet accurately models weekly, seasonal, and overall trends paving the way for optimal resource allocation for radiology exam acquisition and interpretation. Springer International Publishing 2021-11-09 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8577854/ /pubmed/34755249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00532-4 Text en © The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2021
spellingShingle Article
Becker, Anton S.
Erinjeri, Joseph P.
Chaim, Joshua
Kastango, Nicholas
Elnajjar, Pierre
Hricak, Hedvig
Vargas, H. Alberto
Automatic Forecasting of Radiology Examination Volume Trends for Optimal Resource Planning and Allocation
title Automatic Forecasting of Radiology Examination Volume Trends for Optimal Resource Planning and Allocation
title_full Automatic Forecasting of Radiology Examination Volume Trends for Optimal Resource Planning and Allocation
title_fullStr Automatic Forecasting of Radiology Examination Volume Trends for Optimal Resource Planning and Allocation
title_full_unstemmed Automatic Forecasting of Radiology Examination Volume Trends for Optimal Resource Planning and Allocation
title_short Automatic Forecasting of Radiology Examination Volume Trends for Optimal Resource Planning and Allocation
title_sort automatic forecasting of radiology examination volume trends for optimal resource planning and allocation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34755249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-021-00532-4
work_keys_str_mv AT beckerantons automaticforecastingofradiologyexaminationvolumetrendsforoptimalresourceplanningandallocation
AT erinjerijosephp automaticforecastingofradiologyexaminationvolumetrendsforoptimalresourceplanningandallocation
AT chaimjoshua automaticforecastingofradiologyexaminationvolumetrendsforoptimalresourceplanningandallocation
AT kastangonicholas automaticforecastingofradiologyexaminationvolumetrendsforoptimalresourceplanningandallocation
AT elnajjarpierre automaticforecastingofradiologyexaminationvolumetrendsforoptimalresourceplanningandallocation
AT hricakhedvig automaticforecastingofradiologyexaminationvolumetrendsforoptimalresourceplanningandallocation
AT vargashalberto automaticforecastingofradiologyexaminationvolumetrendsforoptimalresourceplanningandallocation