Cargando…

Reducing Sugar Production from Teff Straw Biomass Using Dilute Sulfuric Acid Hydrolysis: Characterization and Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology

The present study evaluated first the characterization of Teff straw and then Box–Behnken design (BBD), and response surface methodology was adopted to optimize the parameters (hydrolysis temperature, dilute sulfuric acid concentration, solid to liquid ratio, and hydrolysis time) of dilute sulfuric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tesfaw, Andinet Alemayehu, Tizazu, Belachew Zegale
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34764995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2857764
_version_ 1784596163766255616
author Tesfaw, Andinet Alemayehu
Tizazu, Belachew Zegale
author_facet Tesfaw, Andinet Alemayehu
Tizazu, Belachew Zegale
author_sort Tesfaw, Andinet Alemayehu
collection PubMed
description The present study evaluated first the characterization of Teff straw and then Box–Behnken design (BBD), and response surface methodology was adopted to optimize the parameters (hydrolysis temperature, dilute sulfuric acid concentration, solid to liquid ratio, and hydrolysis time) of dilute sulfuric acid hydrolysis of Teff straw in order to get a maximum yield of total reducing sugar (TRS). The chemical analysis of Teff straw revealed high amounts of cellulose (41.8 wt%), hemicellulose (38 wt%), and lignin (17 wt%). The morphological analysis using SEM showed that hydrolyzed Teff straw with dilute sulfuric acid has more pores and distorted bundles than those of raw Teff straw. XRD analysis also indicated that hydrolyzed Teff straw has higher crystallinity index and smaller crystallite size than raw Teff straw, which might be due to removal of hemicellulose, amorphous cellulose, and lignin components. Under the optimized conditions for dilute sulfuric acid hydrolysis of Teff straw (120°C, 4% v/v H(2)SO(4) concentration, 1 : 20 solid to liquid ratio, and 55 min hydrolysis time), we have found a total reducing sugar yield of 26.65 mg/g. The results of validation experiment under the optimum conditions agreed well with model predictions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8577925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85779252021-11-10 Reducing Sugar Production from Teff Straw Biomass Using Dilute Sulfuric Acid Hydrolysis: Characterization and Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology Tesfaw, Andinet Alemayehu Tizazu, Belachew Zegale Int J Biomater Research Article The present study evaluated first the characterization of Teff straw and then Box–Behnken design (BBD), and response surface methodology was adopted to optimize the parameters (hydrolysis temperature, dilute sulfuric acid concentration, solid to liquid ratio, and hydrolysis time) of dilute sulfuric acid hydrolysis of Teff straw in order to get a maximum yield of total reducing sugar (TRS). The chemical analysis of Teff straw revealed high amounts of cellulose (41.8 wt%), hemicellulose (38 wt%), and lignin (17 wt%). The morphological analysis using SEM showed that hydrolyzed Teff straw with dilute sulfuric acid has more pores and distorted bundles than those of raw Teff straw. XRD analysis also indicated that hydrolyzed Teff straw has higher crystallinity index and smaller crystallite size than raw Teff straw, which might be due to removal of hemicellulose, amorphous cellulose, and lignin components. Under the optimized conditions for dilute sulfuric acid hydrolysis of Teff straw (120°C, 4% v/v H(2)SO(4) concentration, 1 : 20 solid to liquid ratio, and 55 min hydrolysis time), we have found a total reducing sugar yield of 26.65 mg/g. The results of validation experiment under the optimum conditions agreed well with model predictions. Hindawi 2021-11-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8577925/ /pubmed/34764995 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2857764 Text en Copyright © 2021 Andinet Alemayehu Tesfaw and Belachew Zegale Tizazu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tesfaw, Andinet Alemayehu
Tizazu, Belachew Zegale
Reducing Sugar Production from Teff Straw Biomass Using Dilute Sulfuric Acid Hydrolysis: Characterization and Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology
title Reducing Sugar Production from Teff Straw Biomass Using Dilute Sulfuric Acid Hydrolysis: Characterization and Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology
title_full Reducing Sugar Production from Teff Straw Biomass Using Dilute Sulfuric Acid Hydrolysis: Characterization and Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology
title_fullStr Reducing Sugar Production from Teff Straw Biomass Using Dilute Sulfuric Acid Hydrolysis: Characterization and Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology
title_full_unstemmed Reducing Sugar Production from Teff Straw Biomass Using Dilute Sulfuric Acid Hydrolysis: Characterization and Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology
title_short Reducing Sugar Production from Teff Straw Biomass Using Dilute Sulfuric Acid Hydrolysis: Characterization and Optimization Using Response Surface Methodology
title_sort reducing sugar production from teff straw biomass using dilute sulfuric acid hydrolysis: characterization and optimization using response surface methodology
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8577925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34764995
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/2857764
work_keys_str_mv AT tesfawandinetalemayehu reducingsugarproductionfromteffstrawbiomassusingdilutesulfuricacidhydrolysischaracterizationandoptimizationusingresponsesurfacemethodology
AT tizazubelachewzegale reducingsugarproductionfromteffstrawbiomassusingdilutesulfuricacidhydrolysischaracterizationandoptimizationusingresponsesurfacemethodology