Cargando…

First clinical evaluation of breathing controlled four-dimensional computed tomography imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) has become an essential part of radiotherapy planning but is often affected by artifacts. A new breathing controlled 4DCT (i4DCT) algorithm has been introduced. This study aims to present the first clinical data and to evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szkitsak, Juliane, Werner, René, Fernolendt, Susanne, Schwarz, Annette, Ott, Oliver J., Fietkau, Rainer, Hofmann, Christian, Bert, Christoph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34786496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.09.005
_version_ 1784596190843633664
author Szkitsak, Juliane
Werner, René
Fernolendt, Susanne
Schwarz, Annette
Ott, Oliver J.
Fietkau, Rainer
Hofmann, Christian
Bert, Christoph
author_facet Szkitsak, Juliane
Werner, René
Fernolendt, Susanne
Schwarz, Annette
Ott, Oliver J.
Fietkau, Rainer
Hofmann, Christian
Bert, Christoph
author_sort Szkitsak, Juliane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) has become an essential part of radiotherapy planning but is often affected by artifacts. A new breathing controlled 4DCT (i4DCT) algorithm has been introduced. This study aims to present the first clinical data and to evaluate the achieved image quality, projection data coverage and beam-on time. MATERIAL & METHODS: The analysis included i4DCT data for 129 scans of patients with thoracic tumors. Projection data coverage and beam-on time were evaluated. Additionally, image quality was exemplarily discussed and rated by ten clinical experts with a 5-score-scale for 30 patients with large variations in their breathing pattern (‘challenging subgroup’). Rated images were reconstructed amplitude- and phase-based. RESULTS: Expert scoring revealed that 78% (amplitude-based) and 63% (phase-based) of the challenging subgroup were artifact-free (rating ≥4). For the entire cohort, average beam-on time per couch position was 4.9 ± 1.6 s. For the challenging subgroup, time increased slightly but not significantly compared to the remaining patients (5.1 s vs. 4.9 s; p = 0.64). Median projection data coverage was 93% and 94% for inhalation and exhalation, respectively, for the entire cohort. The comparison for the subgroup and the remaining patients revealed a small but significant decrease of the median coverage values for the challenging cases (inhalation: 90% vs. 94%, p = 0.02; exhalation: 93% vs. 94%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This first clinical evaluation of i4DCT shows very promising results in terms of image quality and projection data coverage. The results agree with and support the results of previous i4DCT phantom studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8578040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85780402021-11-15 First clinical evaluation of breathing controlled four-dimensional computed tomography imaging Szkitsak, Juliane Werner, René Fernolendt, Susanne Schwarz, Annette Ott, Oliver J. Fietkau, Rainer Hofmann, Christian Bert, Christoph Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) has become an essential part of radiotherapy planning but is often affected by artifacts. A new breathing controlled 4DCT (i4DCT) algorithm has been introduced. This study aims to present the first clinical data and to evaluate the achieved image quality, projection data coverage and beam-on time. MATERIAL & METHODS: The analysis included i4DCT data for 129 scans of patients with thoracic tumors. Projection data coverage and beam-on time were evaluated. Additionally, image quality was exemplarily discussed and rated by ten clinical experts with a 5-score-scale for 30 patients with large variations in their breathing pattern (‘challenging subgroup’). Rated images were reconstructed amplitude- and phase-based. RESULTS: Expert scoring revealed that 78% (amplitude-based) and 63% (phase-based) of the challenging subgroup were artifact-free (rating ≥4). For the entire cohort, average beam-on time per couch position was 4.9 ± 1.6 s. For the challenging subgroup, time increased slightly but not significantly compared to the remaining patients (5.1 s vs. 4.9 s; p = 0.64). Median projection data coverage was 93% and 94% for inhalation and exhalation, respectively, for the entire cohort. The comparison for the subgroup and the remaining patients revealed a small but significant decrease of the median coverage values for the challenging cases (inhalation: 90% vs. 94%, p = 0.02; exhalation: 93% vs. 94%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This first clinical evaluation of i4DCT shows very promising results in terms of image quality and projection data coverage. The results agree with and support the results of previous i4DCT phantom studies. Elsevier 2021-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8578040/ /pubmed/34786496 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.09.005 Text en © 2021 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Szkitsak, Juliane
Werner, René
Fernolendt, Susanne
Schwarz, Annette
Ott, Oliver J.
Fietkau, Rainer
Hofmann, Christian
Bert, Christoph
First clinical evaluation of breathing controlled four-dimensional computed tomography imaging
title First clinical evaluation of breathing controlled four-dimensional computed tomography imaging
title_full First clinical evaluation of breathing controlled four-dimensional computed tomography imaging
title_fullStr First clinical evaluation of breathing controlled four-dimensional computed tomography imaging
title_full_unstemmed First clinical evaluation of breathing controlled four-dimensional computed tomography imaging
title_short First clinical evaluation of breathing controlled four-dimensional computed tomography imaging
title_sort first clinical evaluation of breathing controlled four-dimensional computed tomography imaging
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34786496
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.09.005
work_keys_str_mv AT szkitsakjuliane firstclinicalevaluationofbreathingcontrolledfourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimaging
AT wernerrene firstclinicalevaluationofbreathingcontrolledfourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimaging
AT fernolendtsusanne firstclinicalevaluationofbreathingcontrolledfourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimaging
AT schwarzannette firstclinicalevaluationofbreathingcontrolledfourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimaging
AT ottoliverj firstclinicalevaluationofbreathingcontrolledfourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimaging
AT fietkaurainer firstclinicalevaluationofbreathingcontrolledfourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimaging
AT hofmannchristian firstclinicalevaluationofbreathingcontrolledfourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimaging
AT bertchristoph firstclinicalevaluationofbreathingcontrolledfourdimensionalcomputedtomographyimaging