Cargando…

Splenorenal shunt for reconstruction of the gastric and splenic venous drainage during pancreatoduodenectomy with resection of the portal venous confluence

BACKGROUND: Resection of the portal venous confluence is frequently necessary for radical resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. However, ligation of the splenic vein can cause serious postoperative complications such as gastric/splenic venous congestion and left-sided portal hypertensio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Saeedi, Mohammed, Frank-Moldzio, Leonie, Contin, Pietro, Mayer, Philipp, Loos, Martin, Schmidt, Thomas, Schneider, Martin, Müller-Stich, Beat P., Berchtold, Christoph, Mehrabi, Arianeb, Hackert, Thilo, Büchler, Markus W., Strobel, Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34618219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02318-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Resection of the portal venous confluence is frequently necessary for radical resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer. However, ligation of the splenic vein can cause serious postoperative complications such as gastric/splenic venous congestion and left-sided portal hypertension. A splenorenal shunt (SRS) can maintain gastric and splenic venous drainage and mitigate these complications. PURPOSE: This study describes the surgical technique, postoperative course, and surgical outcomes of SRS after pancreatoduodenectomy. METHODS: Ten patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy and SRS between September 2017 and April 2019 were evaluated. After resection an end-to-side anastomosis between the splenic vein and the left renal vein was performed. Postoperative shunt patency, splenic volume, and any SRS-related complications were recorded. RESULTS: The rates of short- and long-term shunt patency were 100% and 60%, respectively. No procedure-associated complications were observed. No signs of left-sided portal hypertension, such as gastrointestinal bleeding or splenomegaly, and no gastric/splenic ischemia were observed in patients after SRS. CONCLUSION: SRS is a safe and effective measure to mitigate gastric congestion and left-sided portal hypertension after pancreatoduodenectomy with compromised gastric venous drainage after resection of the portal venous confluence.