Cargando…

Test–retest assessment of non-contrast MRI sequences to characterise and quantify the small bowel wall in healthy participants

OBJECTIVE: Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging sequences have been investigated as objective imaging biomarkers of fibrosis and inflammation in Crohn’s disease. AIM: To determine the repeatability and inter- and intra-observer agreement of these measures in the prepared small bowel wall. METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alyami, Ali. S., Williams, Hannah. G., Argyriou, Konstantinos, Gunn, David, Wilkinson-Smith, Victoria, White, Jonathan. R., Alyami, Jaber, Gowland, Penny. A., Moran, Gordon. W., Hoad, Caroline. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34089407
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-021-00931-2
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging sequences have been investigated as objective imaging biomarkers of fibrosis and inflammation in Crohn’s disease. AIM: To determine the repeatability and inter- and intra-observer agreement of these measures in the prepared small bowel wall. METHODS: Ten healthy participants were scanned at 3 T on 2 separate occasions using T1 and T2 relaxometry, IVIM-DWI and MT sequences. Test–retest repeatability was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CoV) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer agreement RESULTS: Test–retest repeatability in the bowel wall was excellent for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR), T1, and diffusion coefficient D (CoV 5%, 7%, 8%, and 10%, respectively), good for perfusion fraction (PF) (CoV 20%) and acceptable for T2 (CoV 21%). Inter-observer agreement was good for the T2, D and ADC (ICC = 0.89, 0.86, 0.76, respectively) and moderate for T1 (ICC = 0.55). Intra-observer agreement was similar to inter-observer agreement. DISCUSSION: This study showed variable results between the different parameters measured. Test–retest repeatability was at least acceptable for all parameters except pseudo-diffusion coefficient D*. Good inter- and intra-observer agreement was obtained for T2, ADC and D, with these parameters performing best in this technical validation study.