Cargando…
Survey of water proton longitudinal relaxation in liver in vivo
OBJECTIVE: To determine the variability, and preferred values, for normal liver longitudinal water proton relaxation rate R(1) in the published literature. METHODS: Values of mean R(1) and between-subject variance were obtained from literature searching. Weighted means were fitted to a heuristic and...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33978944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-021-00928-x |
_version_ | 1784596219912257536 |
---|---|
author | Waterton, John Charles |
author_facet | Waterton, John Charles |
author_sort | Waterton, John Charles |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the variability, and preferred values, for normal liver longitudinal water proton relaxation rate R(1) in the published literature. METHODS: Values of mean R(1) and between-subject variance were obtained from literature searching. Weighted means were fitted to a heuristic and to a model. RESULTS: After exclusions, 116 publications (143 studies) remained, representing apparently normal liver in 3392 humans, 99 mice and 249 rats. Seventeen field strengths were included between 0.04 T and 9.4 T. Older studies tended to report higher between-subject coefficients of variation (CoV), but for studies published since 1992, the median between-subject CoV was 7.4%, and in half of those studies, measured R(1) deviated from model by 8.0% or less. DISCUSSION: The within-study between-subject CoV incorporates repeatability error and true between-subject variation. Between-study variation also incorporates between-population variation, together with bias from interactions between methodology and physiology. While quantitative relaxometry ultimately requires validation with phantoms and analysis of propagation of errors, this survey allows investigators to compare their own R(1) and variability values with the range of existing literature. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10334-021-00928-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8578172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85781722021-11-15 Survey of water proton longitudinal relaxation in liver in vivo Waterton, John Charles MAGMA Review OBJECTIVE: To determine the variability, and preferred values, for normal liver longitudinal water proton relaxation rate R(1) in the published literature. METHODS: Values of mean R(1) and between-subject variance were obtained from literature searching. Weighted means were fitted to a heuristic and to a model. RESULTS: After exclusions, 116 publications (143 studies) remained, representing apparently normal liver in 3392 humans, 99 mice and 249 rats. Seventeen field strengths were included between 0.04 T and 9.4 T. Older studies tended to report higher between-subject coefficients of variation (CoV), but for studies published since 1992, the median between-subject CoV was 7.4%, and in half of those studies, measured R(1) deviated from model by 8.0% or less. DISCUSSION: The within-study between-subject CoV incorporates repeatability error and true between-subject variation. Between-study variation also incorporates between-population variation, together with bias from interactions between methodology and physiology. While quantitative relaxometry ultimately requires validation with phantoms and analysis of propagation of errors, this survey allows investigators to compare their own R(1) and variability values with the range of existing literature. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10334-021-00928-x. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8578172/ /pubmed/33978944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-021-00928-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Waterton, John Charles Survey of water proton longitudinal relaxation in liver in vivo |
title | Survey of water proton longitudinal relaxation in liver in vivo |
title_full | Survey of water proton longitudinal relaxation in liver in vivo |
title_fullStr | Survey of water proton longitudinal relaxation in liver in vivo |
title_full_unstemmed | Survey of water proton longitudinal relaxation in liver in vivo |
title_short | Survey of water proton longitudinal relaxation in liver in vivo |
title_sort | survey of water proton longitudinal relaxation in liver in vivo |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33978944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10334-021-00928-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT watertonjohncharles surveyofwaterprotonlongitudinalrelaxationinliverinvivo |