Cargando…

Magnetic sphincter augmentation device removal: surgical technique and results at medium-term follow-up

BACKGROUND: The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) device has become a common option for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Knowledge of MSA-related complications, indications for removal, and techniques are puzzled. With this study, we aimed to evaluate indications, techniq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bona, Davide, Saino, Greta, Mini, Emanuele, Lombardo, Francesca, Panizzo, Valerio, Cavalli, Marta, Bonitta, Gianluca, Campanelli, Giampiero, Aiolfi, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34462810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02294-7
_version_ 1784596221204103168
author Bona, Davide
Saino, Greta
Mini, Emanuele
Lombardo, Francesca
Panizzo, Valerio
Cavalli, Marta
Bonitta, Gianluca
Campanelli, Giampiero
Aiolfi, Alberto
author_facet Bona, Davide
Saino, Greta
Mini, Emanuele
Lombardo, Francesca
Panizzo, Valerio
Cavalli, Marta
Bonitta, Gianluca
Campanelli, Giampiero
Aiolfi, Alberto
author_sort Bona, Davide
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) device has become a common option for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Knowledge of MSA-related complications, indications for removal, and techniques are puzzled. With this study, we aimed to evaluate indications, techniques for removal, surgical approach, and outcomes with MSA removal. METHODS: This is an observational singe-center study. Patients were followed up regularly with endoscopy, pH monitoring, and assessed for specific gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) and generic short-form 36 (SF-36) quality of life. RESULTS: Five patients underwent MSA explant. Four patients were males and the median age was 47 years (range 44–55). Heartburn, epigastric/chest pain, and dysphagia were commonly reported. The median implant duration was 46 months (range 31–72). A laparoscopic approach was adopted in all patients. Intraoperative findings included normal anatomy (40%), herniation in the mediastinum (40%), and erosion (20%). The most common anti-reflux procedures were Dor (n = 2), Toupet (n = 2), and anterior partial fundoplication (n = 1). The median operative time was 145 min (range 60–185), and the median hospital length of stay was 4 days (range 3–6). The median postoperative follow-up was 41 months (range 12–51). At the last follow-up, 80% of patients were off PPI; the GERD-HRQL and SF-36 questionnaire were improved with DeMeester score and esophageal acid exposure normalization. CONCLUSION: The MSA device can be safely explanted through a single-stage laparoscopic procedure. Tailoring a fundoplication, according to preoperative patient symptoms and intraoperative findings, seems feasible and safe with a promising trend toward improved symptoms and quality of life. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-021-02294-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8578182
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85781822021-11-15 Magnetic sphincter augmentation device removal: surgical technique and results at medium-term follow-up Bona, Davide Saino, Greta Mini, Emanuele Lombardo, Francesca Panizzo, Valerio Cavalli, Marta Bonitta, Gianluca Campanelli, Giampiero Aiolfi, Alberto Langenbecks Arch Surg How-I-Do-It articles BACKGROUND: The magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) device has become a common option for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Knowledge of MSA-related complications, indications for removal, and techniques are puzzled. With this study, we aimed to evaluate indications, techniques for removal, surgical approach, and outcomes with MSA removal. METHODS: This is an observational singe-center study. Patients were followed up regularly with endoscopy, pH monitoring, and assessed for specific gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) and generic short-form 36 (SF-36) quality of life. RESULTS: Five patients underwent MSA explant. Four patients were males and the median age was 47 years (range 44–55). Heartburn, epigastric/chest pain, and dysphagia were commonly reported. The median implant duration was 46 months (range 31–72). A laparoscopic approach was adopted in all patients. Intraoperative findings included normal anatomy (40%), herniation in the mediastinum (40%), and erosion (20%). The most common anti-reflux procedures were Dor (n = 2), Toupet (n = 2), and anterior partial fundoplication (n = 1). The median operative time was 145 min (range 60–185), and the median hospital length of stay was 4 days (range 3–6). The median postoperative follow-up was 41 months (range 12–51). At the last follow-up, 80% of patients were off PPI; the GERD-HRQL and SF-36 questionnaire were improved with DeMeester score and esophageal acid exposure normalization. CONCLUSION: The MSA device can be safely explanted through a single-stage laparoscopic procedure. Tailoring a fundoplication, according to preoperative patient symptoms and intraoperative findings, seems feasible and safe with a promising trend toward improved symptoms and quality of life. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-021-02294-7. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-08-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8578182/ /pubmed/34462810 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02294-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle How-I-Do-It articles
Bona, Davide
Saino, Greta
Mini, Emanuele
Lombardo, Francesca
Panizzo, Valerio
Cavalli, Marta
Bonitta, Gianluca
Campanelli, Giampiero
Aiolfi, Alberto
Magnetic sphincter augmentation device removal: surgical technique and results at medium-term follow-up
title Magnetic sphincter augmentation device removal: surgical technique and results at medium-term follow-up
title_full Magnetic sphincter augmentation device removal: surgical technique and results at medium-term follow-up
title_fullStr Magnetic sphincter augmentation device removal: surgical technique and results at medium-term follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic sphincter augmentation device removal: surgical technique and results at medium-term follow-up
title_short Magnetic sphincter augmentation device removal: surgical technique and results at medium-term follow-up
title_sort magnetic sphincter augmentation device removal: surgical technique and results at medium-term follow-up
topic How-I-Do-It articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578182/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34462810
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-021-02294-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bonadavide magneticsphincteraugmentationdeviceremovalsurgicaltechniqueandresultsatmediumtermfollowup
AT sainogreta magneticsphincteraugmentationdeviceremovalsurgicaltechniqueandresultsatmediumtermfollowup
AT miniemanuele magneticsphincteraugmentationdeviceremovalsurgicaltechniqueandresultsatmediumtermfollowup
AT lombardofrancesca magneticsphincteraugmentationdeviceremovalsurgicaltechniqueandresultsatmediumtermfollowup
AT panizzovalerio magneticsphincteraugmentationdeviceremovalsurgicaltechniqueandresultsatmediumtermfollowup
AT cavallimarta magneticsphincteraugmentationdeviceremovalsurgicaltechniqueandresultsatmediumtermfollowup
AT bonittagianluca magneticsphincteraugmentationdeviceremovalsurgicaltechniqueandresultsatmediumtermfollowup
AT campanelligiampiero magneticsphincteraugmentationdeviceremovalsurgicaltechniqueandresultsatmediumtermfollowup
AT aiolfialberto magneticsphincteraugmentationdeviceremovalsurgicaltechniqueandresultsatmediumtermfollowup