Cargando…

Using hierarchical clustering analysis to evaluate COVID-19 pandemic preparedness and performance in 180 countries in 2020

OBJECTIVE: To rank and score 180 countries according to COVID-19 cases and fatality in 2020 and compare the results to existing pandemic vulnerability prediction models and results generated by standard epidemiological scoring techniques. SETTING: One hundred and eighty countries’ patients with COVI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sadeghi, Banafsheh, Cheung, Rex C Y, Hanbury, Meagan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049844
_version_ 1784596222143627264
author Sadeghi, Banafsheh
Cheung, Rex C Y
Hanbury, Meagan
author_facet Sadeghi, Banafsheh
Cheung, Rex C Y
Hanbury, Meagan
author_sort Sadeghi, Banafsheh
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To rank and score 180 countries according to COVID-19 cases and fatality in 2020 and compare the results to existing pandemic vulnerability prediction models and results generated by standard epidemiological scoring techniques. SETTING: One hundred and eighty countries’ patients with COVID-19 and fatality data representing the healthcare system preparedness and performance in combating the pandemic in 2020. DESIGN: Using the retrospective daily COVID-19 data in 2020 broken into 24 half-month periods, we applied unsupervised machine learning techniques, in particular, hierarchical clustering analysis to cluster countries into five groups within each period according to their cumulative COVID-19 fatality per day over the year and cumulative COVID-19 cases per million population per day over the half-month period. We used the average of the period scores to assign countries’ final scores for each measure. PRIMARY OUTCOME: The primary outcomes are the COVID-19 cases and fatality grades in 2020. RESULTS: The United Arab Emirates and the USA with F in COVID-19 cases, achieved A or B in the fatality scores. Belgium and Sweden ranked F in both scores. Although no African country ranked F for COVID-19 cases, several African countries such as Gambia and Liberia had F for fatality scores. More developing countries ranked D and F in fatality than in COVID-19 case rankings. The classic epidemiological measures such as averages and rates have a relatively good correlation with our methodology, but past predictions failed to forecast the COVID-19 countries’ preparedness. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 fatality can be a good proxy for countries’ resources and system’s resilience in managing the pandemic. These findings suggest that countries’ economic and sociopolitical factors may behave in a more complex way as were believed. To explore these complex epidemiological associations, models can benefit enormously by taking advantage of methods developed in computer science and machine learning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8578186
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85781862021-11-10 Using hierarchical clustering analysis to evaluate COVID-19 pandemic preparedness and performance in 180 countries in 2020 Sadeghi, Banafsheh Cheung, Rex C Y Hanbury, Meagan BMJ Open Epidemiology OBJECTIVE: To rank and score 180 countries according to COVID-19 cases and fatality in 2020 and compare the results to existing pandemic vulnerability prediction models and results generated by standard epidemiological scoring techniques. SETTING: One hundred and eighty countries’ patients with COVID-19 and fatality data representing the healthcare system preparedness and performance in combating the pandemic in 2020. DESIGN: Using the retrospective daily COVID-19 data in 2020 broken into 24 half-month periods, we applied unsupervised machine learning techniques, in particular, hierarchical clustering analysis to cluster countries into five groups within each period according to their cumulative COVID-19 fatality per day over the year and cumulative COVID-19 cases per million population per day over the half-month period. We used the average of the period scores to assign countries’ final scores for each measure. PRIMARY OUTCOME: The primary outcomes are the COVID-19 cases and fatality grades in 2020. RESULTS: The United Arab Emirates and the USA with F in COVID-19 cases, achieved A or B in the fatality scores. Belgium and Sweden ranked F in both scores. Although no African country ranked F for COVID-19 cases, several African countries such as Gambia and Liberia had F for fatality scores. More developing countries ranked D and F in fatality than in COVID-19 case rankings. The classic epidemiological measures such as averages and rates have a relatively good correlation with our methodology, but past predictions failed to forecast the COVID-19 countries’ preparedness. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 fatality can be a good proxy for countries’ resources and system’s resilience in managing the pandemic. These findings suggest that countries’ economic and sociopolitical factors may behave in a more complex way as were believed. To explore these complex epidemiological associations, models can benefit enormously by taking advantage of methods developed in computer science and machine learning. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8578186/ /pubmed/34753756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049844 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Sadeghi, Banafsheh
Cheung, Rex C Y
Hanbury, Meagan
Using hierarchical clustering analysis to evaluate COVID-19 pandemic preparedness and performance in 180 countries in 2020
title Using hierarchical clustering analysis to evaluate COVID-19 pandemic preparedness and performance in 180 countries in 2020
title_full Using hierarchical clustering analysis to evaluate COVID-19 pandemic preparedness and performance in 180 countries in 2020
title_fullStr Using hierarchical clustering analysis to evaluate COVID-19 pandemic preparedness and performance in 180 countries in 2020
title_full_unstemmed Using hierarchical clustering analysis to evaluate COVID-19 pandemic preparedness and performance in 180 countries in 2020
title_short Using hierarchical clustering analysis to evaluate COVID-19 pandemic preparedness and performance in 180 countries in 2020
title_sort using hierarchical clustering analysis to evaluate covid-19 pandemic preparedness and performance in 180 countries in 2020
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578186/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049844
work_keys_str_mv AT sadeghibanafsheh usinghierarchicalclusteringanalysistoevaluatecovid19pandemicpreparednessandperformancein180countriesin2020
AT cheungrexcy usinghierarchicalclusteringanalysistoevaluatecovid19pandemicpreparednessandperformancein180countriesin2020
AT hanburymeagan usinghierarchicalclusteringanalysistoevaluatecovid19pandemicpreparednessandperformancein180countriesin2020