Cargando…

Rationing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit—ethical or unethical?

Rationing in health care is controversial, and even more so in pediatrics. Children are an inherently vulnerable group because they are reliant on their parents and caregivers to make decisions in their best interests and have no political voice. Historically, there has been general acceptance of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirby, Lynette, Basu, Shreerupa, Close, Eliana, Jansen, Melanie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765505
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-20-334
_version_ 1784596299818991616
author Kirby, Lynette
Basu, Shreerupa
Close, Eliana
Jansen, Melanie
author_facet Kirby, Lynette
Basu, Shreerupa
Close, Eliana
Jansen, Melanie
author_sort Kirby, Lynette
collection PubMed
description Rationing in health care is controversial, and even more so in pediatrics. Children are an inherently vulnerable group because they are reliant on their parents and caregivers to make decisions in their best interests and have no political voice. Historically, there has been general acceptance of the need to ration healthcare at a systems level, however there is controversy over whether healthcare professionals should be involved in rationing at the bedside. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted that bedside rationing is unavoidable, at least in times of extreme resource scarcity. Internationally, there has been significant ethical analysis and guideline development to guide intensive care rationing decisions in the event that resources are overwhelmed. This paper explores the principles underlying distributive justice in healthcare rationing and discusses how these were operationalized in ethical guidelines for the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, rationing is unavoidable and occurs constantly in everyday nursing and medical ICU practice, often in mundane and uncontroversial ways. Some argue that these everyday decisions are not true rationing decisions, but resource allocation, or stewardship decisions. We argue there are no clear lines between resource allocation and rationing decisions, rather that they occur on a spectrum. These everyday rationing decisions are particularly susceptible to personal biases that are often implicit. Due to the subtle and constant nature of most everyday rationing decisions, specific guideline development will rarely be practical or appropriate. However, it is possible to develop other processes to improve decision making. There are a variety of strategies we recommend for this including, encouraging reflective practice; developing explicit frameworks that promote collaborative decision making; being transparent about resource allocation and rationing decisions with colleagues, patients, and families; and promoting a workplace culture of speaking up and accessing support in identifying and managing everyday rationing decisions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8578748
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85787482021-11-10 Rationing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit—ethical or unethical? Kirby, Lynette Basu, Shreerupa Close, Eliana Jansen, Melanie Transl Pediatr Review Article on Pediatric Critical Care Rationing in health care is controversial, and even more so in pediatrics. Children are an inherently vulnerable group because they are reliant on their parents and caregivers to make decisions in their best interests and have no political voice. Historically, there has been general acceptance of the need to ration healthcare at a systems level, however there is controversy over whether healthcare professionals should be involved in rationing at the bedside. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted that bedside rationing is unavoidable, at least in times of extreme resource scarcity. Internationally, there has been significant ethical analysis and guideline development to guide intensive care rationing decisions in the event that resources are overwhelmed. This paper explores the principles underlying distributive justice in healthcare rationing and discusses how these were operationalized in ethical guidelines for the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, rationing is unavoidable and occurs constantly in everyday nursing and medical ICU practice, often in mundane and uncontroversial ways. Some argue that these everyday decisions are not true rationing decisions, but resource allocation, or stewardship decisions. We argue there are no clear lines between resource allocation and rationing decisions, rather that they occur on a spectrum. These everyday rationing decisions are particularly susceptible to personal biases that are often implicit. Due to the subtle and constant nature of most everyday rationing decisions, specific guideline development will rarely be practical or appropriate. However, it is possible to develop other processes to improve decision making. There are a variety of strategies we recommend for this including, encouraging reflective practice; developing explicit frameworks that promote collaborative decision making; being transparent about resource allocation and rationing decisions with colleagues, patients, and families; and promoting a workplace culture of speaking up and accessing support in identifying and managing everyday rationing decisions. AME Publishing Company 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8578748/ /pubmed/34765505 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-20-334 Text en 2021 Translational Pediatrics. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Article on Pediatric Critical Care
Kirby, Lynette
Basu, Shreerupa
Close, Eliana
Jansen, Melanie
Rationing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit—ethical or unethical?
title Rationing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit—ethical or unethical?
title_full Rationing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit—ethical or unethical?
title_fullStr Rationing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit—ethical or unethical?
title_full_unstemmed Rationing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit—ethical or unethical?
title_short Rationing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit—ethical or unethical?
title_sort rationing in the pediatric intensive care unit—ethical or unethical?
topic Review Article on Pediatric Critical Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578748/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765505
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tp-20-334
work_keys_str_mv AT kirbylynette rationinginthepediatricintensivecareunitethicalorunethical
AT basushreerupa rationinginthepediatricintensivecareunitethicalorunethical
AT closeeliana rationinginthepediatricintensivecareunitethicalorunethical
AT jansenmelanie rationinginthepediatricintensivecareunitethicalorunethical