Cargando…

Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study

PURPOSE: To explore the characteristics of C-TIRADS by comparing it with ACR-TIRADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS. METHODS: A total of 1096 nodules were collected from 884 patients undergoing thyroidectomy in our center between May 2018 and December 2020. Divided the nodules into two grou...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Qi, Zhou, Aiyun, Guo, Suping, Huang, Xingzhi, Chen, Songli, Li, Yaohui, Xu, Pan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777258
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.763897
_version_ 1784596331493326848
author Qi, Qi
Zhou, Aiyun
Guo, Suping
Huang, Xingzhi
Chen, Songli
Li, Yaohui
Xu, Pan
author_facet Qi, Qi
Zhou, Aiyun
Guo, Suping
Huang, Xingzhi
Chen, Songli
Li, Yaohui
Xu, Pan
author_sort Qi, Qi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To explore the characteristics of C-TIRADS by comparing it with ACR-TIRADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS. METHODS: A total of 1096 nodules were collected from 884 patients undergoing thyroidectomy in our center between May 2018 and December 2020. Divided the nodules into two groups: “>10mm” and “≤10mm”. Ultrasound characteristics of each nodule were observed and recorded by 2 doctors, then classified based on ACR-TIRADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, and C-TIRADS. RESULTS: A total of 682 benign nodules cases (62.23%) and 414 malignant nodules cases (37.77%) were identified. The ICC value of each guideline was:0.937(ACR-TIRADS), 0.858(EU-IRADS), 0.811(Kwak-TIRADS), 0.835(KTA/KSThR-TIRADS) and 0.854(C-TIRADS). The nodule malignancy rates in the groups(Kwak-TIRADS 4B, C-TIRADS 4B、4C) of two sizes were significantly different (all p<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the other grades of two sizes (all p>0.05). Unnecessary biopsy rates were the lowest in C-TIRADS (49.02% p<0.001). Furthermore, Kwak-TIRADS had the highest sensitivity and NPV (89.9%, 91.0%, all p<0.05), while C-TIRADS had the highest specificity and PPV (82.3%, 69.2%, all p<0.05). C-TIRADS and Kwak-TIRADS had the highest accuracy (76.0%, 72.5%, P=0.071). The AUCs of the 5 guidelines were C-TIRADS(0.816, P<0.05), Kwak-TIRADS(0.789, P<0.05) KTA/KSThR-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS(0.773, 0.763, P=0.305), EU-TIRADS(0.734, P<0.05). The AUCs of the five guidelines were not statistically different between “nodules>10mm” and “nodules ≤ 10mm” (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: All five guides showed excellent interobserver agreement. C-TIRADS was slightly efficient than Kwak-IRADS, KTA/KSThR-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS, and had greater advantages than EU-TIRADS. The diagnostic abilities of the five guidelines for “nodules ≤ 10mm” were not inferior to that of “nodules> 10mm”. C-TIRADS is simple and easy to implement and can provide effective thyroid tumor risk stratification for thyroid nodule diagnosis, especially in China.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8578891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85788912021-11-11 Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study Qi, Qi Zhou, Aiyun Guo, Suping Huang, Xingzhi Chen, Songli Li, Yaohui Xu, Pan Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology PURPOSE: To explore the characteristics of C-TIRADS by comparing it with ACR-TIRADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS. METHODS: A total of 1096 nodules were collected from 884 patients undergoing thyroidectomy in our center between May 2018 and December 2020. Divided the nodules into two groups: “>10mm” and “≤10mm”. Ultrasound characteristics of each nodule were observed and recorded by 2 doctors, then classified based on ACR-TIRADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, and C-TIRADS. RESULTS: A total of 682 benign nodules cases (62.23%) and 414 malignant nodules cases (37.77%) were identified. The ICC value of each guideline was:0.937(ACR-TIRADS), 0.858(EU-IRADS), 0.811(Kwak-TIRADS), 0.835(KTA/KSThR-TIRADS) and 0.854(C-TIRADS). The nodule malignancy rates in the groups(Kwak-TIRADS 4B, C-TIRADS 4B、4C) of two sizes were significantly different (all p<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the other grades of two sizes (all p>0.05). Unnecessary biopsy rates were the lowest in C-TIRADS (49.02% p<0.001). Furthermore, Kwak-TIRADS had the highest sensitivity and NPV (89.9%, 91.0%, all p<0.05), while C-TIRADS had the highest specificity and PPV (82.3%, 69.2%, all p<0.05). C-TIRADS and Kwak-TIRADS had the highest accuracy (76.0%, 72.5%, P=0.071). The AUCs of the 5 guidelines were C-TIRADS(0.816, P<0.05), Kwak-TIRADS(0.789, P<0.05) KTA/KSThR-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS(0.773, 0.763, P=0.305), EU-TIRADS(0.734, P<0.05). The AUCs of the five guidelines were not statistically different between “nodules>10mm” and “nodules ≤ 10mm” (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: All five guides showed excellent interobserver agreement. C-TIRADS was slightly efficient than Kwak-IRADS, KTA/KSThR-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS, and had greater advantages than EU-TIRADS. The diagnostic abilities of the five guidelines for “nodules ≤ 10mm” were not inferior to that of “nodules> 10mm”. C-TIRADS is simple and easy to implement and can provide effective thyroid tumor risk stratification for thyroid nodule diagnosis, especially in China. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8578891/ /pubmed/34777258 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.763897 Text en Copyright © 2021 Qi, Zhou, Guo, Huang, Chen, Li and Xu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Qi, Qi
Zhou, Aiyun
Guo, Suping
Huang, Xingzhi
Chen, Songli
Li, Yaohui
Xu, Pan
Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study
title Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study
title_full Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study
title_fullStr Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study
title_full_unstemmed Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study
title_short Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study
title_sort explore the diagnostic efficiency of chinese thyroid imaging reporting and data systems by comparing with the other four systems (acr ti-rads, kwak-tirads, ksthr-tirads, and eu-tirads): a single-center study
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777258
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.763897
work_keys_str_mv AT qiqi explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy
AT zhouaiyun explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy
AT guosuping explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy
AT huangxingzhi explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy
AT chensongli explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy
AT liyaohui explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy
AT xupan explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy