Cargando…
Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study
PURPOSE: To explore the characteristics of C-TIRADS by comparing it with ACR-TIRADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS. METHODS: A total of 1096 nodules were collected from 884 patients undergoing thyroidectomy in our center between May 2018 and December 2020. Divided the nodules into two grou...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777258 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.763897 |
_version_ | 1784596331493326848 |
---|---|
author | Qi, Qi Zhou, Aiyun Guo, Suping Huang, Xingzhi Chen, Songli Li, Yaohui Xu, Pan |
author_facet | Qi, Qi Zhou, Aiyun Guo, Suping Huang, Xingzhi Chen, Songli Li, Yaohui Xu, Pan |
author_sort | Qi, Qi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To explore the characteristics of C-TIRADS by comparing it with ACR-TIRADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS. METHODS: A total of 1096 nodules were collected from 884 patients undergoing thyroidectomy in our center between May 2018 and December 2020. Divided the nodules into two groups: “>10mm” and “≤10mm”. Ultrasound characteristics of each nodule were observed and recorded by 2 doctors, then classified based on ACR-TIRADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, and C-TIRADS. RESULTS: A total of 682 benign nodules cases (62.23%) and 414 malignant nodules cases (37.77%) were identified. The ICC value of each guideline was:0.937(ACR-TIRADS), 0.858(EU-IRADS), 0.811(Kwak-TIRADS), 0.835(KTA/KSThR-TIRADS) and 0.854(C-TIRADS). The nodule malignancy rates in the groups(Kwak-TIRADS 4B, C-TIRADS 4B、4C) of two sizes were significantly different (all p<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the other grades of two sizes (all p>0.05). Unnecessary biopsy rates were the lowest in C-TIRADS (49.02% p<0.001). Furthermore, Kwak-TIRADS had the highest sensitivity and NPV (89.9%, 91.0%, all p<0.05), while C-TIRADS had the highest specificity and PPV (82.3%, 69.2%, all p<0.05). C-TIRADS and Kwak-TIRADS had the highest accuracy (76.0%, 72.5%, P=0.071). The AUCs of the 5 guidelines were C-TIRADS(0.816, P<0.05), Kwak-TIRADS(0.789, P<0.05) KTA/KSThR-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS(0.773, 0.763, P=0.305), EU-TIRADS(0.734, P<0.05). The AUCs of the five guidelines were not statistically different between “nodules>10mm” and “nodules ≤ 10mm” (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: All five guides showed excellent interobserver agreement. C-TIRADS was slightly efficient than Kwak-IRADS, KTA/KSThR-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS, and had greater advantages than EU-TIRADS. The diagnostic abilities of the five guidelines for “nodules ≤ 10mm” were not inferior to that of “nodules> 10mm”. C-TIRADS is simple and easy to implement and can provide effective thyroid tumor risk stratification for thyroid nodule diagnosis, especially in China. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8578891 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85788912021-11-11 Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study Qi, Qi Zhou, Aiyun Guo, Suping Huang, Xingzhi Chen, Songli Li, Yaohui Xu, Pan Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology PURPOSE: To explore the characteristics of C-TIRADS by comparing it with ACR-TIRADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS. METHODS: A total of 1096 nodules were collected from 884 patients undergoing thyroidectomy in our center between May 2018 and December 2020. Divided the nodules into two groups: “>10mm” and “≤10mm”. Ultrasound characteristics of each nodule were observed and recorded by 2 doctors, then classified based on ACR-TIRADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, EU-TIRADS, and C-TIRADS. RESULTS: A total of 682 benign nodules cases (62.23%) and 414 malignant nodules cases (37.77%) were identified. The ICC value of each guideline was:0.937(ACR-TIRADS), 0.858(EU-IRADS), 0.811(Kwak-TIRADS), 0.835(KTA/KSThR-TIRADS) and 0.854(C-TIRADS). The nodule malignancy rates in the groups(Kwak-TIRADS 4B, C-TIRADS 4B、4C) of two sizes were significantly different (all p<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the other grades of two sizes (all p>0.05). Unnecessary biopsy rates were the lowest in C-TIRADS (49.02% p<0.001). Furthermore, Kwak-TIRADS had the highest sensitivity and NPV (89.9%, 91.0%, all p<0.05), while C-TIRADS had the highest specificity and PPV (82.3%, 69.2%, all p<0.05). C-TIRADS and Kwak-TIRADS had the highest accuracy (76.0%, 72.5%, P=0.071). The AUCs of the 5 guidelines were C-TIRADS(0.816, P<0.05), Kwak-TIRADS(0.789, P<0.05) KTA/KSThR-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS(0.773, 0.763, P=0.305), EU-TIRADS(0.734, P<0.05). The AUCs of the five guidelines were not statistically different between “nodules>10mm” and “nodules ≤ 10mm” (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: All five guides showed excellent interobserver agreement. C-TIRADS was slightly efficient than Kwak-IRADS, KTA/KSThR-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS, and had greater advantages than EU-TIRADS. The diagnostic abilities of the five guidelines for “nodules ≤ 10mm” were not inferior to that of “nodules> 10mm”. C-TIRADS is simple and easy to implement and can provide effective thyroid tumor risk stratification for thyroid nodule diagnosis, especially in China. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8578891/ /pubmed/34777258 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.763897 Text en Copyright © 2021 Qi, Zhou, Guo, Huang, Chen, Li and Xu https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Endocrinology Qi, Qi Zhou, Aiyun Guo, Suping Huang, Xingzhi Chen, Songli Li, Yaohui Xu, Pan Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study |
title | Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study |
title_full | Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study |
title_fullStr | Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study |
title_short | Explore the Diagnostic Efficiency of Chinese Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems by Comparing With the Other Four Systems (ACR TI-RADS, Kwak-TIRADS, KSThR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS): A Single-Center Study |
title_sort | explore the diagnostic efficiency of chinese thyroid imaging reporting and data systems by comparing with the other four systems (acr ti-rads, kwak-tirads, ksthr-tirads, and eu-tirads): a single-center study |
topic | Endocrinology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8578891/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777258 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.763897 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qiqi explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy AT zhouaiyun explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy AT guosuping explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy AT huangxingzhi explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy AT chensongli explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy AT liyaohui explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy AT xupan explorethediagnosticefficiencyofchinesethyroidimagingreportinganddatasystemsbycomparingwiththeotherfoursystemsacrtiradskwaktiradsksthrtiradsandeutiradsasinglecenterstudy |