Cargando…

Deviation Analyses of Computer-Assisted, Template-Guided Mandibular Reconstruction With Combined Osteotomy and Reconstruction Pre-Shaped Plate Position Technology: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted and template-guided mandibular reconstruction provides higher accuracy and less variation than conventional freehand surgeries. The combined osteotomy and reconstruction pre-shaped plate position (CORPPP) technique is a reliable choice for mandibular reconstruction. Thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jie, Zhang, Ruipu, Liang, Ye, Ma, Yujie, Song, Saiwen, Jiang, Canhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34778034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.719466
_version_ 1784596377994526720
author Chen, Jie
Zhang, Ruipu
Liang, Ye
Ma, Yujie
Song, Saiwen
Jiang, Canhua
author_facet Chen, Jie
Zhang, Ruipu
Liang, Ye
Ma, Yujie
Song, Saiwen
Jiang, Canhua
author_sort Chen, Jie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted and template-guided mandibular reconstruction provides higher accuracy and less variation than conventional freehand surgeries. The combined osteotomy and reconstruction pre-shaped plate position (CORPPP) technique is a reliable choice for mandibular reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CORPPP-guided fibular flap mandibular reconstruction and analyze the possible causes of the deviations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2015 to December 2016, 28 patients underwent fibular flap mandibular reconstruction. Virtual planning and personalized CORPPP-guided templates were applied in 15 patients while 13 patients received conventional freehand surgeries. Deviations during mandibulectomy and fibular osteotomy, and overall and triaxial deviation of the corresponding mandibular anatomical landmarks were measured by superimposing the pre- and postoperative virtual models. RESULTS: The deviation of the resection line and resection angle was 1.23 ± 0.98 mm and 4.11° ± 2.60°. The actual length of fibula segments was longer than the designed length in 7 cases (mean: 0.35 ± 0.32 mm) and shorter in 22 cases (mean: 1.53 ± 1.19 mm). In patients without ramus reconstruction, deviations of the ipsilateral condylar head point (Co.), gonion point (Go.), and coracoid process point (Cor.) were 6.71 ± 3.42 mm, 5.38 ± 1.71 mm, and 11.05 ± 3.24 mm in the freehand group and 1.73 ± 1.13 mm, 1.86 ± 0.96 mm, and 2.54 ± 0.50 mm in the CORPPP group, respectively, with significant statistical differences (p < 0.05). In patients with ramus reconstruction, deviations of ipsilateral Co. and Go. were 9.79 ± 4.74 mm vs. 3.57 ± 1.62 mm (p < 0.05), and 15.17 ± 6.53 mm vs. 4.36 ± 1.68 mm (p < 0.05) in the freehand group and CORPPP group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Mandibular reconstructions employing virtual planning and personalized CORPPP-guided templates show significantly higher predictability, convenience, and accuracy of mandibular reconstruction compared with conventional freehand surgeries. However, more clinical cases were required for further dimensional deviation analysis. The application and exploration of clinical practice would also continuously improve the design of templates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8579124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85791242021-11-11 Deviation Analyses of Computer-Assisted, Template-Guided Mandibular Reconstruction With Combined Osteotomy and Reconstruction Pre-Shaped Plate Position Technology: A Comparative Study Chen, Jie Zhang, Ruipu Liang, Ye Ma, Yujie Song, Saiwen Jiang, Canhua Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted and template-guided mandibular reconstruction provides higher accuracy and less variation than conventional freehand surgeries. The combined osteotomy and reconstruction pre-shaped plate position (CORPPP) technique is a reliable choice for mandibular reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CORPPP-guided fibular flap mandibular reconstruction and analyze the possible causes of the deviations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 2015 to December 2016, 28 patients underwent fibular flap mandibular reconstruction. Virtual planning and personalized CORPPP-guided templates were applied in 15 patients while 13 patients received conventional freehand surgeries. Deviations during mandibulectomy and fibular osteotomy, and overall and triaxial deviation of the corresponding mandibular anatomical landmarks were measured by superimposing the pre- and postoperative virtual models. RESULTS: The deviation of the resection line and resection angle was 1.23 ± 0.98 mm and 4.11° ± 2.60°. The actual length of fibula segments was longer than the designed length in 7 cases (mean: 0.35 ± 0.32 mm) and shorter in 22 cases (mean: 1.53 ± 1.19 mm). In patients without ramus reconstruction, deviations of the ipsilateral condylar head point (Co.), gonion point (Go.), and coracoid process point (Cor.) were 6.71 ± 3.42 mm, 5.38 ± 1.71 mm, and 11.05 ± 3.24 mm in the freehand group and 1.73 ± 1.13 mm, 1.86 ± 0.96 mm, and 2.54 ± 0.50 mm in the CORPPP group, respectively, with significant statistical differences (p < 0.05). In patients with ramus reconstruction, deviations of ipsilateral Co. and Go. were 9.79 ± 4.74 mm vs. 3.57 ± 1.62 mm (p < 0.05), and 15.17 ± 6.53 mm vs. 4.36 ± 1.68 mm (p < 0.05) in the freehand group and CORPPP group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Mandibular reconstructions employing virtual planning and personalized CORPPP-guided templates show significantly higher predictability, convenience, and accuracy of mandibular reconstruction compared with conventional freehand surgeries. However, more clinical cases were required for further dimensional deviation analysis. The application and exploration of clinical practice would also continuously improve the design of templates. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8579124/ /pubmed/34778034 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.719466 Text en Copyright © 2021 Chen, Zhang, Liang, Ma, Song and Jiang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Chen, Jie
Zhang, Ruipu
Liang, Ye
Ma, Yujie
Song, Saiwen
Jiang, Canhua
Deviation Analyses of Computer-Assisted, Template-Guided Mandibular Reconstruction With Combined Osteotomy and Reconstruction Pre-Shaped Plate Position Technology: A Comparative Study
title Deviation Analyses of Computer-Assisted, Template-Guided Mandibular Reconstruction With Combined Osteotomy and Reconstruction Pre-Shaped Plate Position Technology: A Comparative Study
title_full Deviation Analyses of Computer-Assisted, Template-Guided Mandibular Reconstruction With Combined Osteotomy and Reconstruction Pre-Shaped Plate Position Technology: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Deviation Analyses of Computer-Assisted, Template-Guided Mandibular Reconstruction With Combined Osteotomy and Reconstruction Pre-Shaped Plate Position Technology: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Deviation Analyses of Computer-Assisted, Template-Guided Mandibular Reconstruction With Combined Osteotomy and Reconstruction Pre-Shaped Plate Position Technology: A Comparative Study
title_short Deviation Analyses of Computer-Assisted, Template-Guided Mandibular Reconstruction With Combined Osteotomy and Reconstruction Pre-Shaped Plate Position Technology: A Comparative Study
title_sort deviation analyses of computer-assisted, template-guided mandibular reconstruction with combined osteotomy and reconstruction pre-shaped plate position technology: a comparative study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34778034
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.719466
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjie deviationanalysesofcomputerassistedtemplateguidedmandibularreconstructionwithcombinedosteotomyandreconstructionpreshapedplatepositiontechnologyacomparativestudy
AT zhangruipu deviationanalysesofcomputerassistedtemplateguidedmandibularreconstructionwithcombinedosteotomyandreconstructionpreshapedplatepositiontechnologyacomparativestudy
AT liangye deviationanalysesofcomputerassistedtemplateguidedmandibularreconstructionwithcombinedosteotomyandreconstructionpreshapedplatepositiontechnologyacomparativestudy
AT mayujie deviationanalysesofcomputerassistedtemplateguidedmandibularreconstructionwithcombinedosteotomyandreconstructionpreshapedplatepositiontechnologyacomparativestudy
AT songsaiwen deviationanalysesofcomputerassistedtemplateguidedmandibularreconstructionwithcombinedosteotomyandreconstructionpreshapedplatepositiontechnologyacomparativestudy
AT jiangcanhua deviationanalysesofcomputerassistedtemplateguidedmandibularreconstructionwithcombinedosteotomyandreconstructionpreshapedplatepositiontechnologyacomparativestudy