Cargando…

Determining the impact of the Zika pandemic on primary care providers’ contraceptive counseling of non-pregnant patients in the US: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Global pandemics like Zika (ZIKV) factor into pregnancy planning and avoidance, yet little is known about how primary care providers (PCPs) incorporate public health guidance into contraceptive counseling. Study objectives include: 1) determining the impact of the ZIKV pandemic on contra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaiser, Jennifer E., Galindo, Eduardo, Sanders, Jessica N., Simmons, Rebecca G., Gawron, Lori M., Herrick, Jennifer S., Brintz, Benjamin, Turok, David K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07170-0
_version_ 1784596459994218496
author Kaiser, Jennifer E.
Galindo, Eduardo
Sanders, Jessica N.
Simmons, Rebecca G.
Gawron, Lori M.
Herrick, Jennifer S.
Brintz, Benjamin
Turok, David K.
author_facet Kaiser, Jennifer E.
Galindo, Eduardo
Sanders, Jessica N.
Simmons, Rebecca G.
Gawron, Lori M.
Herrick, Jennifer S.
Brintz, Benjamin
Turok, David K.
author_sort Kaiser, Jennifer E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Global pandemics like Zika (ZIKV) factor into pregnancy planning and avoidance, yet little is known about how primary care providers (PCPs) incorporate public health guidance into contraceptive counseling. Study objectives include: 1) determining the impact of the ZIKV pandemic on contraceptive counseling changes; and 2) assessing PCP knowledge and practice regarding contraception, ZIKV, and CDC ZIKV guidelines. METHODS: Study components included: (1) a retrospective review of electronic health records of non-pregnant, reproductive age women presenting for preventive health visits between 2014 and 2017 assessed using interrupted time series analyses (ITSA) to identify changes in documentation of ZIKV risk assessment and contraceptive counseling; and (2) a sequential, cross-sectional study with quantitative surveys and qualitative, semi-structured interviews of PCPs providing preventive care to non-pregnant patients at eight federally qualified health centers in Utah. We performed descriptive analyses on survey data and analyzed qualitative data for dominant themes using a modified Health Belief Model. RESULTS: We conducted 6634 chart reviews yielding 9840 visits. The ITSA did not reveal changes in ZIKV risk assessment or contraceptive counseling. Twenty-two out of 40 (55%) eligible providers participated in the provider component. Participants averaged 69 and 81% correct on contraceptive and ZIKV knowledge questions, respectively. Sixty-five percent reported counseling consistent with CDC ZIKV guidelines. Qualitative analysis found providers unlikely to prioritize ZIKV risk assessment in contraceptive counseling for non-pregnant patients. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs who care for non-pregnant women are knowledgeable about contraception and ZIKV; however, there was no change in ZIKV risk assessment or contraceptive counseling. This stresses the importance of developing strategies to improve guideline uptake. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07170-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8579600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85796002021-11-10 Determining the impact of the Zika pandemic on primary care providers’ contraceptive counseling of non-pregnant patients in the US: a mixed methods study Kaiser, Jennifer E. Galindo, Eduardo Sanders, Jessica N. Simmons, Rebecca G. Gawron, Lori M. Herrick, Jennifer S. Brintz, Benjamin Turok, David K. BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Global pandemics like Zika (ZIKV) factor into pregnancy planning and avoidance, yet little is known about how primary care providers (PCPs) incorporate public health guidance into contraceptive counseling. Study objectives include: 1) determining the impact of the ZIKV pandemic on contraceptive counseling changes; and 2) assessing PCP knowledge and practice regarding contraception, ZIKV, and CDC ZIKV guidelines. METHODS: Study components included: (1) a retrospective review of electronic health records of non-pregnant, reproductive age women presenting for preventive health visits between 2014 and 2017 assessed using interrupted time series analyses (ITSA) to identify changes in documentation of ZIKV risk assessment and contraceptive counseling; and (2) a sequential, cross-sectional study with quantitative surveys and qualitative, semi-structured interviews of PCPs providing preventive care to non-pregnant patients at eight federally qualified health centers in Utah. We performed descriptive analyses on survey data and analyzed qualitative data for dominant themes using a modified Health Belief Model. RESULTS: We conducted 6634 chart reviews yielding 9840 visits. The ITSA did not reveal changes in ZIKV risk assessment or contraceptive counseling. Twenty-two out of 40 (55%) eligible providers participated in the provider component. Participants averaged 69 and 81% correct on contraceptive and ZIKV knowledge questions, respectively. Sixty-five percent reported counseling consistent with CDC ZIKV guidelines. Qualitative analysis found providers unlikely to prioritize ZIKV risk assessment in contraceptive counseling for non-pregnant patients. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs who care for non-pregnant women are knowledgeable about contraception and ZIKV; however, there was no change in ZIKV risk assessment or contraceptive counseling. This stresses the importance of developing strategies to improve guideline uptake. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07170-0. BioMed Central 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8579600/ /pubmed/34753479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07170-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Kaiser, Jennifer E.
Galindo, Eduardo
Sanders, Jessica N.
Simmons, Rebecca G.
Gawron, Lori M.
Herrick, Jennifer S.
Brintz, Benjamin
Turok, David K.
Determining the impact of the Zika pandemic on primary care providers’ contraceptive counseling of non-pregnant patients in the US: a mixed methods study
title Determining the impact of the Zika pandemic on primary care providers’ contraceptive counseling of non-pregnant patients in the US: a mixed methods study
title_full Determining the impact of the Zika pandemic on primary care providers’ contraceptive counseling of non-pregnant patients in the US: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Determining the impact of the Zika pandemic on primary care providers’ contraceptive counseling of non-pregnant patients in the US: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Determining the impact of the Zika pandemic on primary care providers’ contraceptive counseling of non-pregnant patients in the US: a mixed methods study
title_short Determining the impact of the Zika pandemic on primary care providers’ contraceptive counseling of non-pregnant patients in the US: a mixed methods study
title_sort determining the impact of the zika pandemic on primary care providers’ contraceptive counseling of non-pregnant patients in the us: a mixed methods study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753479
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07170-0
work_keys_str_mv AT kaiserjennifere determiningtheimpactofthezikapandemiconprimarycareproviderscontraceptivecounselingofnonpregnantpatientsintheusamixedmethodsstudy
AT galindoeduardo determiningtheimpactofthezikapandemiconprimarycareproviderscontraceptivecounselingofnonpregnantpatientsintheusamixedmethodsstudy
AT sandersjessican determiningtheimpactofthezikapandemiconprimarycareproviderscontraceptivecounselingofnonpregnantpatientsintheusamixedmethodsstudy
AT simmonsrebeccag determiningtheimpactofthezikapandemiconprimarycareproviderscontraceptivecounselingofnonpregnantpatientsintheusamixedmethodsstudy
AT gawronlorim determiningtheimpactofthezikapandemiconprimarycareproviderscontraceptivecounselingofnonpregnantpatientsintheusamixedmethodsstudy
AT herrickjennifers determiningtheimpactofthezikapandemiconprimarycareproviderscontraceptivecounselingofnonpregnantpatientsintheusamixedmethodsstudy
AT brintzbenjamin determiningtheimpactofthezikapandemiconprimarycareproviderscontraceptivecounselingofnonpregnantpatientsintheusamixedmethodsstudy
AT turokdavidk determiningtheimpactofthezikapandemiconprimarycareproviderscontraceptivecounselingofnonpregnantpatientsintheusamixedmethodsstudy