Cargando…

The ensemble learning model is not better than the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation in Chinese CKD patients in the external validation study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical practicability of the ensemble learning model established by Liu et al. in estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and validate whether it is a better model than the Asian modified Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in a cohort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Li, Zhang, Jing-jing, Tian, Xin, Huang, Jian-min, Xie, Peng, Li, Xiang-zhou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02595-5
_version_ 1784596461639434240
author Zhao, Li
Zhang, Jing-jing
Tian, Xin
Huang, Jian-min
Xie, Peng
Li, Xiang-zhou
author_facet Zhao, Li
Zhang, Jing-jing
Tian, Xin
Huang, Jian-min
Xie, Peng
Li, Xiang-zhou
author_sort Zhao, Li
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical practicability of the ensemble learning model established by Liu et al. in estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and validate whether it is a better model than the Asian modified Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in a cohort of Chinese chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in an external validation study. METHODS: According to the ensemble learning model and the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation, we calculated estimated GFR(ensemble) and GFR(CKD-EPI), separately. Diagnostic performance of the two models was assessed and compared by correlation coefficient, regression equation, Bland–Altman analysis, bias, precision and P(30) under the premise of (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) dual plasma sample clearance method as reference method for GFR measurement (mGFR). RESULTS: A total of 158 Chinese CKD patients were included in our external validation study. The GFR(ensemble) was highly related with mGFR, with the correlation coefficient of 0.94. However, regression equation of GFR(ensemble) = 0.66*mGFR + 23.05, the regression coefficient was far away from one, and the intercept was wide. Compared with the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation, the diagnostic performance of the ensemble learning model also demonstrated a wider 95% limit of agreement in Bland-Altman analysis (52.6 vs 42.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), a poorer bias (8.0 vs 1.0 ml/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.02), an inferior precision (18.4 vs 12.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2), P < 0.001) and a lower P(30) (58.9% vs 74.1%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the ensemble learning model cannot replace the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation for the first choice for GFR estimation in overall Chinese CKD patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-021-02595-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8579608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85796082021-11-10 The ensemble learning model is not better than the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation in Chinese CKD patients in the external validation study Zhao, Li Zhang, Jing-jing Tian, Xin Huang, Jian-min Xie, Peng Li, Xiang-zhou BMC Nephrol Research OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical practicability of the ensemble learning model established by Liu et al. in estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and validate whether it is a better model than the Asian modified Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation in a cohort of Chinese chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients in an external validation study. METHODS: According to the ensemble learning model and the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation, we calculated estimated GFR(ensemble) and GFR(CKD-EPI), separately. Diagnostic performance of the two models was assessed and compared by correlation coefficient, regression equation, Bland–Altman analysis, bias, precision and P(30) under the premise of (99m)Tc-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid ((99m)Tc-DTPA) dual plasma sample clearance method as reference method for GFR measurement (mGFR). RESULTS: A total of 158 Chinese CKD patients were included in our external validation study. The GFR(ensemble) was highly related with mGFR, with the correlation coefficient of 0.94. However, regression equation of GFR(ensemble) = 0.66*mGFR + 23.05, the regression coefficient was far away from one, and the intercept was wide. Compared with the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation, the diagnostic performance of the ensemble learning model also demonstrated a wider 95% limit of agreement in Bland-Altman analysis (52.6 vs 42.4 ml/min/1.73 m(2)), a poorer bias (8.0 vs 1.0 ml/min/1.73 m(2), P = 0.02), an inferior precision (18.4 vs 12.7 ml/min/1.73 m(2), P < 0.001) and a lower P(30) (58.9% vs 74.1%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that the ensemble learning model cannot replace the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation for the first choice for GFR estimation in overall Chinese CKD patients. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-021-02595-5. BioMed Central 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8579608/ /pubmed/34753430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02595-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhao, Li
Zhang, Jing-jing
Tian, Xin
Huang, Jian-min
Xie, Peng
Li, Xiang-zhou
The ensemble learning model is not better than the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation in Chinese CKD patients in the external validation study
title The ensemble learning model is not better than the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation in Chinese CKD patients in the external validation study
title_full The ensemble learning model is not better than the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation in Chinese CKD patients in the external validation study
title_fullStr The ensemble learning model is not better than the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation in Chinese CKD patients in the external validation study
title_full_unstemmed The ensemble learning model is not better than the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation in Chinese CKD patients in the external validation study
title_short The ensemble learning model is not better than the Asian modified CKD-EPI equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation in Chinese CKD patients in the external validation study
title_sort ensemble learning model is not better than the asian modified ckd-epi equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation in chinese ckd patients in the external validation study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02595-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoli theensemblelearningmodelisnotbetterthantheasianmodifiedckdepiequationforglomerularfiltrationrateestimationinchineseckdpatientsintheexternalvalidationstudy
AT zhangjingjing theensemblelearningmodelisnotbetterthantheasianmodifiedckdepiequationforglomerularfiltrationrateestimationinchineseckdpatientsintheexternalvalidationstudy
AT tianxin theensemblelearningmodelisnotbetterthantheasianmodifiedckdepiequationforglomerularfiltrationrateestimationinchineseckdpatientsintheexternalvalidationstudy
AT huangjianmin theensemblelearningmodelisnotbetterthantheasianmodifiedckdepiequationforglomerularfiltrationrateestimationinchineseckdpatientsintheexternalvalidationstudy
AT xiepeng theensemblelearningmodelisnotbetterthantheasianmodifiedckdepiequationforglomerularfiltrationrateestimationinchineseckdpatientsintheexternalvalidationstudy
AT lixiangzhou theensemblelearningmodelisnotbetterthantheasianmodifiedckdepiequationforglomerularfiltrationrateestimationinchineseckdpatientsintheexternalvalidationstudy
AT zhaoli ensemblelearningmodelisnotbetterthantheasianmodifiedckdepiequationforglomerularfiltrationrateestimationinchineseckdpatientsintheexternalvalidationstudy
AT zhangjingjing ensemblelearningmodelisnotbetterthantheasianmodifiedckdepiequationforglomerularfiltrationrateestimationinchineseckdpatientsintheexternalvalidationstudy
AT tianxin ensemblelearningmodelisnotbetterthantheasianmodifiedckdepiequationforglomerularfiltrationrateestimationinchineseckdpatientsintheexternalvalidationstudy
AT huangjianmin ensemblelearningmodelisnotbetterthantheasianmodifiedckdepiequationforglomerularfiltrationrateestimationinchineseckdpatientsintheexternalvalidationstudy
AT xiepeng ensemblelearningmodelisnotbetterthantheasianmodifiedckdepiequationforglomerularfiltrationrateestimationinchineseckdpatientsintheexternalvalidationstudy
AT lixiangzhou ensemblelearningmodelisnotbetterthantheasianmodifiedckdepiequationforglomerularfiltrationrateestimationinchineseckdpatientsintheexternalvalidationstudy