Cargando…

The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy measures such as sensitivity and specificity of smartphone-based artificial intelligence (AI) approaches in the detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: A literature search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases (up to March 2020) was conducted. Only s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheikh, Aadil, Bhatti, Ahsan, Adeyemi, Oluwaseun, Raja, Muhammad, Sheikh, Ijaz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765807
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2452-2325.329064
_version_ 1784596498082693120
author Sheikh, Aadil
Bhatti, Ahsan
Adeyemi, Oluwaseun
Raja, Muhammad
Sheikh, Ijaz
author_facet Sheikh, Aadil
Bhatti, Ahsan
Adeyemi, Oluwaseun
Raja, Muhammad
Sheikh, Ijaz
author_sort Sheikh, Aadil
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy measures such as sensitivity and specificity of smartphone-based artificial intelligence (AI) approaches in the detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: A literature search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases (up to March 2020) was conducted. Only studies using both smartphone-based cameras and AI software for image analysis were included. The main outcome measures were pooled sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratios and relative risk of smartphone-based AI approaches in detecting DR (of all types), and referable DR (RDR) (moderate nonproliferative retinopathy or worse and/or the presence of diabetic macular edema). RESULTS: Smartphone-based AI has a pooled sensitivity of 89.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.3%–94.0%) and pooled specificity of 92.4% (95% CI: 86.4%–95.9%) in detecting DR. For referable disease, sensitivity is 97.9% (95% CI: 92.6%-99.4%), and the pooled specificity is 85.9% (95% CI: 76.5%–91.9%). The technology is better at correctly identifying referable retinopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The smartphone-based AI programs demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of DR and RDR and are potentially viable substitutes for conventional diabetic screening approaches. Further, high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to establish the effectiveness of this approach in different populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8579798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85797982021-11-10 The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Sheikh, Aadil Bhatti, Ahsan Adeyemi, Oluwaseun Raja, Muhammad Sheikh, Ijaz J Curr Ophthalmol Review Article PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy measures such as sensitivity and specificity of smartphone-based artificial intelligence (AI) approaches in the detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: A literature search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases (up to March 2020) was conducted. Only studies using both smartphone-based cameras and AI software for image analysis were included. The main outcome measures were pooled sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratios and relative risk of smartphone-based AI approaches in detecting DR (of all types), and referable DR (RDR) (moderate nonproliferative retinopathy or worse and/or the presence of diabetic macular edema). RESULTS: Smartphone-based AI has a pooled sensitivity of 89.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.3%–94.0%) and pooled specificity of 92.4% (95% CI: 86.4%–95.9%) in detecting DR. For referable disease, sensitivity is 97.9% (95% CI: 92.6%-99.4%), and the pooled specificity is 85.9% (95% CI: 76.5%–91.9%). The technology is better at correctly identifying referable retinopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The smartphone-based AI programs demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of DR and RDR and are potentially viable substitutes for conventional diabetic screening approaches. Further, high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to establish the effectiveness of this approach in different populations. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8579798/ /pubmed/34765807 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2452-2325.329064 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Current Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Sheikh, Aadil
Bhatti, Ahsan
Adeyemi, Oluwaseun
Raja, Muhammad
Sheikh, Ijaz
The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
title The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort utility of smartphone-based artificial intelligence approaches for diabetic retinopathy: a literature review and meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765807
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2452-2325.329064
work_keys_str_mv AT sheikhaadil theutilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT bhattiahsan theutilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT adeyemioluwaseun theutilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT rajamuhammad theutilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT sheikhijaz theutilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT sheikhaadil utilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT bhattiahsan utilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT adeyemioluwaseun utilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT rajamuhammad utilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis
AT sheikhijaz utilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis