Cargando…
The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy measures such as sensitivity and specificity of smartphone-based artificial intelligence (AI) approaches in the detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: A literature search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases (up to March 2020) was conducted. Only s...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765807 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2452-2325.329064 |
_version_ | 1784596498082693120 |
---|---|
author | Sheikh, Aadil Bhatti, Ahsan Adeyemi, Oluwaseun Raja, Muhammad Sheikh, Ijaz |
author_facet | Sheikh, Aadil Bhatti, Ahsan Adeyemi, Oluwaseun Raja, Muhammad Sheikh, Ijaz |
author_sort | Sheikh, Aadil |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy measures such as sensitivity and specificity of smartphone-based artificial intelligence (AI) approaches in the detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: A literature search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases (up to March 2020) was conducted. Only studies using both smartphone-based cameras and AI software for image analysis were included. The main outcome measures were pooled sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratios and relative risk of smartphone-based AI approaches in detecting DR (of all types), and referable DR (RDR) (moderate nonproliferative retinopathy or worse and/or the presence of diabetic macular edema). RESULTS: Smartphone-based AI has a pooled sensitivity of 89.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.3%–94.0%) and pooled specificity of 92.4% (95% CI: 86.4%–95.9%) in detecting DR. For referable disease, sensitivity is 97.9% (95% CI: 92.6%-99.4%), and the pooled specificity is 85.9% (95% CI: 76.5%–91.9%). The technology is better at correctly identifying referable retinopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The smartphone-based AI programs demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of DR and RDR and are potentially viable substitutes for conventional diabetic screening approaches. Further, high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to establish the effectiveness of this approach in different populations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8579798 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85797982021-11-10 The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Sheikh, Aadil Bhatti, Ahsan Adeyemi, Oluwaseun Raja, Muhammad Sheikh, Ijaz J Curr Ophthalmol Review Article PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy measures such as sensitivity and specificity of smartphone-based artificial intelligence (AI) approaches in the detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). METHODS: A literature search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases (up to March 2020) was conducted. Only studies using both smartphone-based cameras and AI software for image analysis were included. The main outcome measures were pooled sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratios and relative risk of smartphone-based AI approaches in detecting DR (of all types), and referable DR (RDR) (moderate nonproliferative retinopathy or worse and/or the presence of diabetic macular edema). RESULTS: Smartphone-based AI has a pooled sensitivity of 89.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.3%–94.0%) and pooled specificity of 92.4% (95% CI: 86.4%–95.9%) in detecting DR. For referable disease, sensitivity is 97.9% (95% CI: 92.6%-99.4%), and the pooled specificity is 85.9% (95% CI: 76.5%–91.9%). The technology is better at correctly identifying referable retinopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The smartphone-based AI programs demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of DR and RDR and are potentially viable substitutes for conventional diabetic screening approaches. Further, high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to establish the effectiveness of this approach in different populations. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8579798/ /pubmed/34765807 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2452-2325.329064 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Current Ophthalmology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Sheikh, Aadil Bhatti, Ahsan Adeyemi, Oluwaseun Raja, Muhammad Sheikh, Ijaz The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | The Utility of Smartphone-Based Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | utility of smartphone-based artificial intelligence approaches for diabetic retinopathy: a literature review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579798/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765807 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2452-2325.329064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sheikhaadil theutilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT bhattiahsan theutilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT adeyemioluwaseun theutilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT rajamuhammad theutilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT sheikhijaz theutilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT sheikhaadil utilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT bhattiahsan utilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT adeyemioluwaseun utilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT rajamuhammad utilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis AT sheikhijaz utilityofsmartphonebasedartificialintelligenceapproachesfordiabeticretinopathyaliteraturereviewandmetaanalysis |