Cargando…

Predicting open wound mortality in the ICU using machine learning

BACKGROUND: Open wounds have a significant impact on the health of patients causing pain, loss of function, and death. Labeled as a comorbid condition, open wounds represent a “silent epidemic” that affect a large portion of the US population. Due to their burden of care, open wound patients face an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akiki, Ronald K., Anand, Rajsavi S., Borrelli, Mimi, Sarkar, Indra Neil, Liu, Paul Y., Chen, Elizabeth S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765871
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jeccm-20-154
_version_ 1784596525724205056
author Akiki, Ronald K.
Anand, Rajsavi S.
Borrelli, Mimi
Sarkar, Indra Neil
Liu, Paul Y.
Chen, Elizabeth S.
author_facet Akiki, Ronald K.
Anand, Rajsavi S.
Borrelli, Mimi
Sarkar, Indra Neil
Liu, Paul Y.
Chen, Elizabeth S.
author_sort Akiki, Ronald K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Open wounds have a significant impact on the health of patients causing pain, loss of function, and death. Labeled as a comorbid condition, open wounds represent a “silent epidemic” that affect a large portion of the US population. Due to their burden of care, open wound patients face an increased risk of ICU stay and mortality. There is a dearth of studies that investigate mortality among wound patients in the ICU. We sought to develop a model that predicts the risk of mortality among wound patients in the ICU. METHODS: Random forest and binomial logistic regression models were developed to predict the risk of mortality among open wound patients in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. MIMIC-III includes de-identified data for patients who stayed in critical care units of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2001 and 2012. Six variables were used to develop the model (wound location, gender, age, admission type, minimum platelet count and hyperphosphatemia). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index were used to assess model strength. RESULTS: A total of 3,937 patients were included with a mean age of 76.57. Of those, 3,372 (85%) survived and 565 (15%) died during their ICU stay. The random forest model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.924. The CCI and Elixhauser models resulted in AUC of 0.528 and 0.565, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning models may allow clinicians to provide better care and management to open wound patients in the ICU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8579960
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85799602021-11-10 Predicting open wound mortality in the ICU using machine learning Akiki, Ronald K. Anand, Rajsavi S. Borrelli, Mimi Sarkar, Indra Neil Liu, Paul Y. Chen, Elizabeth S. J Emerg Crit Care Med Article BACKGROUND: Open wounds have a significant impact on the health of patients causing pain, loss of function, and death. Labeled as a comorbid condition, open wounds represent a “silent epidemic” that affect a large portion of the US population. Due to their burden of care, open wound patients face an increased risk of ICU stay and mortality. There is a dearth of studies that investigate mortality among wound patients in the ICU. We sought to develop a model that predicts the risk of mortality among wound patients in the ICU. METHODS: Random forest and binomial logistic regression models were developed to predict the risk of mortality among open wound patients in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. MIMIC-III includes de-identified data for patients who stayed in critical care units of the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between 2001 and 2012. Six variables were used to develop the model (wound location, gender, age, admission type, minimum platelet count and hyperphosphatemia). The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index were used to assess model strength. RESULTS: A total of 3,937 patients were included with a mean age of 76.57. Of those, 3,372 (85%) survived and 565 (15%) died during their ICU stay. The random forest model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.924. The CCI and Elixhauser models resulted in AUC of 0.528 and 0.565, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning models may allow clinicians to provide better care and management to open wound patients in the ICU. 2021-04-25 2021-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8579960/ /pubmed/34765871 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jeccm-20-154 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the noncommercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Akiki, Ronald K.
Anand, Rajsavi S.
Borrelli, Mimi
Sarkar, Indra Neil
Liu, Paul Y.
Chen, Elizabeth S.
Predicting open wound mortality in the ICU using machine learning
title Predicting open wound mortality in the ICU using machine learning
title_full Predicting open wound mortality in the ICU using machine learning
title_fullStr Predicting open wound mortality in the ICU using machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Predicting open wound mortality in the ICU using machine learning
title_short Predicting open wound mortality in the ICU using machine learning
title_sort predicting open wound mortality in the icu using machine learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8579960/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34765871
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jeccm-20-154
work_keys_str_mv AT akikironaldk predictingopenwoundmortalityintheicuusingmachinelearning
AT anandrajsavis predictingopenwoundmortalityintheicuusingmachinelearning
AT borrellimimi predictingopenwoundmortalityintheicuusingmachinelearning
AT sarkarindraneil predictingopenwoundmortalityintheicuusingmachinelearning
AT liupauly predictingopenwoundmortalityintheicuusingmachinelearning
AT chenelizabeths predictingopenwoundmortalityintheicuusingmachinelearning