Cargando…

A two‐year prospective study assessing the performance of fetal chromosomal microarray analysis and next‐generation sequencing in high‐risk pregnancies

BACKGROUND: Introduction of cell‐free fetal DNA (cff‐DNA) testing in maternal blood opened possibilities to improve the performance of combined first‐trimester screening (cFTS) in terms of better detection of trisomies and lowering invasive testing rate. The use of new molecular methods, such as chr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ridnõi, Konstantin, Muru, Kai, Keernik, Maria, Pajusalu, Sander, Ustav, Eva‐Liina, Tammur, Pille, Mölter‐Väär, Triin, Kahre, Tiina, Šamarina, Ustina, Asser, Karin, Szirko, Ferenc, Reimand, Tiia, Õunap, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34486251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1787
_version_ 1784596546202894336
author Ridnõi, Konstantin
Muru, Kai
Keernik, Maria
Pajusalu, Sander
Ustav, Eva‐Liina
Tammur, Pille
Mölter‐Väär, Triin
Kahre, Tiina
Šamarina, Ustina
Asser, Karin
Szirko, Ferenc
Reimand, Tiia
Õunap, Katrin
author_facet Ridnõi, Konstantin
Muru, Kai
Keernik, Maria
Pajusalu, Sander
Ustav, Eva‐Liina
Tammur, Pille
Mölter‐Väär, Triin
Kahre, Tiina
Šamarina, Ustina
Asser, Karin
Szirko, Ferenc
Reimand, Tiia
Õunap, Katrin
author_sort Ridnõi, Konstantin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Introduction of cell‐free fetal DNA (cff‐DNA) testing in maternal blood opened possibilities to improve the performance of combined first‐trimester screening (cFTS) in terms of better detection of trisomies and lowering invasive testing rate. The use of new molecular methods, such as chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and next‐generation sequencing (NGS), has shown benefits in prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal and genetic diseases, which are not detectable with cff‐DNA screening, but require an invasive procedure. METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate prospectively during two years performance of CMA and NGS in high‐risk pregnancies. Initially, we investigated 14,566 singleton pregnancies with cFTS. A total of 334 high‐risk pregnancies were selected for CMA diagnostic performance evaluation and 28 cases of highly dysmorphic fetuses for NGS analysis. CMA study group was divided into two groups based on the indications for testing; group A patients with high‐risk for trisomies after cFTS, but normal ultrasound and group B patients who met criteria for CMA as a first‐tier diagnostic test. RESULTS: The diagnostic yield of CMA was overall 3.6% (1.6% in Group A and 6.0% in Group B). In NGS analysis group, we report diagnostic yield of 17.9%. CONCLUSION: The use of CMA in high‐risk pregnancies is justified and provides relevant clinical information in 3.6% of the cases. NGS analysis in fetuses with multiple anomalies shows promising results, but more investigations are needed for a better understanding of practical applications of this molecular diagnosis method in prenatal settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8580097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85800972021-11-17 A two‐year prospective study assessing the performance of fetal chromosomal microarray analysis and next‐generation sequencing in high‐risk pregnancies Ridnõi, Konstantin Muru, Kai Keernik, Maria Pajusalu, Sander Ustav, Eva‐Liina Tammur, Pille Mölter‐Väär, Triin Kahre, Tiina Šamarina, Ustina Asser, Karin Szirko, Ferenc Reimand, Tiia Õunap, Katrin Mol Genet Genomic Med Original Articles BACKGROUND: Introduction of cell‐free fetal DNA (cff‐DNA) testing in maternal blood opened possibilities to improve the performance of combined first‐trimester screening (cFTS) in terms of better detection of trisomies and lowering invasive testing rate. The use of new molecular methods, such as chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) and next‐generation sequencing (NGS), has shown benefits in prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal and genetic diseases, which are not detectable with cff‐DNA screening, but require an invasive procedure. METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate prospectively during two years performance of CMA and NGS in high‐risk pregnancies. Initially, we investigated 14,566 singleton pregnancies with cFTS. A total of 334 high‐risk pregnancies were selected for CMA diagnostic performance evaluation and 28 cases of highly dysmorphic fetuses for NGS analysis. CMA study group was divided into two groups based on the indications for testing; group A patients with high‐risk for trisomies after cFTS, but normal ultrasound and group B patients who met criteria for CMA as a first‐tier diagnostic test. RESULTS: The diagnostic yield of CMA was overall 3.6% (1.6% in Group A and 6.0% in Group B). In NGS analysis group, we report diagnostic yield of 17.9%. CONCLUSION: The use of CMA in high‐risk pregnancies is justified and provides relevant clinical information in 3.6% of the cases. NGS analysis in fetuses with multiple anomalies shows promising results, but more investigations are needed for a better understanding of practical applications of this molecular diagnosis method in prenatal settings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8580097/ /pubmed/34486251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1787 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Ridnõi, Konstantin
Muru, Kai
Keernik, Maria
Pajusalu, Sander
Ustav, Eva‐Liina
Tammur, Pille
Mölter‐Väär, Triin
Kahre, Tiina
Šamarina, Ustina
Asser, Karin
Szirko, Ferenc
Reimand, Tiia
Õunap, Katrin
A two‐year prospective study assessing the performance of fetal chromosomal microarray analysis and next‐generation sequencing in high‐risk pregnancies
title A two‐year prospective study assessing the performance of fetal chromosomal microarray analysis and next‐generation sequencing in high‐risk pregnancies
title_full A two‐year prospective study assessing the performance of fetal chromosomal microarray analysis and next‐generation sequencing in high‐risk pregnancies
title_fullStr A two‐year prospective study assessing the performance of fetal chromosomal microarray analysis and next‐generation sequencing in high‐risk pregnancies
title_full_unstemmed A two‐year prospective study assessing the performance of fetal chromosomal microarray analysis and next‐generation sequencing in high‐risk pregnancies
title_short A two‐year prospective study assessing the performance of fetal chromosomal microarray analysis and next‐generation sequencing in high‐risk pregnancies
title_sort two‐year prospective study assessing the performance of fetal chromosomal microarray analysis and next‐generation sequencing in high‐risk pregnancies
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34486251
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.1787
work_keys_str_mv AT ridnoikonstantin atwoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT murukai atwoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT keernikmaria atwoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT pajusalusander atwoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT ustavevaliina atwoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT tammurpille atwoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT moltervaartriin atwoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT kahretiina atwoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT samarinaustina atwoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT asserkarin atwoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT szirkoferenc atwoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT reimandtiia atwoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT ounapkatrin atwoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT ridnoikonstantin twoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT murukai twoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT keernikmaria twoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT pajusalusander twoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT ustavevaliina twoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT tammurpille twoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT moltervaartriin twoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT kahretiina twoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT samarinaustina twoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT asserkarin twoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT szirkoferenc twoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT reimandtiia twoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies
AT ounapkatrin twoyearprospectivestudyassessingtheperformanceoffetalchromosomalmicroarrayanalysisandnextgenerationsequencinginhighriskpregnancies