Cargando…

Modern perspectives on near-equilibrium analysis of Turing systems

In the nearly seven decades since the publication of Alan Turing’s work on morphogenesis, enormous progress has been made in understanding both the mathematical and biological aspects of his proposed reaction–diffusion theory. Some of these developments were nascent in Turing’s paper, and others hav...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krause, Andrew L., Gaffney, Eamonn A., Maini, Philip K., Klika, Václav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34743603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0268
_version_ 1784596611474653184
author Krause, Andrew L.
Gaffney, Eamonn A.
Maini, Philip K.
Klika, Václav
author_facet Krause, Andrew L.
Gaffney, Eamonn A.
Maini, Philip K.
Klika, Václav
author_sort Krause, Andrew L.
collection PubMed
description In the nearly seven decades since the publication of Alan Turing’s work on morphogenesis, enormous progress has been made in understanding both the mathematical and biological aspects of his proposed reaction–diffusion theory. Some of these developments were nascent in Turing’s paper, and others have been due to new insights from modern mathematical techniques, advances in numerical simulations and extensive biological experiments. Despite such progress, there are still important gaps between theory and experiment, with many examples of biological patterning where the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Here, we review modern developments in the mathematical theory pioneered by Turing, showing how his approach has been generalized to a range of settings beyond the classical two-species reaction–diffusion framework, including evolving and complex manifolds, systems heterogeneous in space and time, and more general reaction-transport equations. While substantial progress has been made in understanding these more complicated models, there are many remaining challenges that we highlight throughout. We focus on the mathematical theory, and in particular linear stability analysis of ‘trivial’ base states. We emphasize important open questions in developing this theory further, and discuss obstacles in using these techniques to understand biological reality. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Recent progress and open frontiers in Turing’s theory of morphogenesis’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8580451
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85804512022-02-02 Modern perspectives on near-equilibrium analysis of Turing systems Krause, Andrew L. Gaffney, Eamonn A. Maini, Philip K. Klika, Václav Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Articles In the nearly seven decades since the publication of Alan Turing’s work on morphogenesis, enormous progress has been made in understanding both the mathematical and biological aspects of his proposed reaction–diffusion theory. Some of these developments were nascent in Turing’s paper, and others have been due to new insights from modern mathematical techniques, advances in numerical simulations and extensive biological experiments. Despite such progress, there are still important gaps between theory and experiment, with many examples of biological patterning where the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Here, we review modern developments in the mathematical theory pioneered by Turing, showing how his approach has been generalized to a range of settings beyond the classical two-species reaction–diffusion framework, including evolving and complex manifolds, systems heterogeneous in space and time, and more general reaction-transport equations. While substantial progress has been made in understanding these more complicated models, there are many remaining challenges that we highlight throughout. We focus on the mathematical theory, and in particular linear stability analysis of ‘trivial’ base states. We emphasize important open questions in developing this theory further, and discuss obstacles in using these techniques to understand biological reality. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Recent progress and open frontiers in Turing’s theory of morphogenesis’. The Royal Society 2021-12-27 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8580451/ /pubmed/34743603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0268 Text en © 2021 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Krause, Andrew L.
Gaffney, Eamonn A.
Maini, Philip K.
Klika, Václav
Modern perspectives on near-equilibrium analysis of Turing systems
title Modern perspectives on near-equilibrium analysis of Turing systems
title_full Modern perspectives on near-equilibrium analysis of Turing systems
title_fullStr Modern perspectives on near-equilibrium analysis of Turing systems
title_full_unstemmed Modern perspectives on near-equilibrium analysis of Turing systems
title_short Modern perspectives on near-equilibrium analysis of Turing systems
title_sort modern perspectives on near-equilibrium analysis of turing systems
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580451/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34743603
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0268
work_keys_str_mv AT krauseandrewl modernperspectivesonnearequilibriumanalysisofturingsystems
AT gaffneyeamonna modernperspectivesonnearequilibriumanalysisofturingsystems
AT mainiphilipk modernperspectivesonnearequilibriumanalysisofturingsystems
AT klikavaclav modernperspectivesonnearequilibriumanalysisofturingsystems