Cargando…
Educating Future Physicians in Artificial Intelligence (AI): An Integrative Review and Proposed Changes
BACKGROUND: As medicine and the delivery of healthcare enters the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the need for competent human–machine interaction to aid clinical decisions will rise. Medical students need to be sufficiently proficient in AI, its advantages to improve healthcare's expenses...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34778562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205211036836 |
_version_ | 1784596616201633792 |
---|---|
author | Grunhut, Joel Wyatt, Adam TM Marques, Oge |
author_facet | Grunhut, Joel Wyatt, Adam TM Marques, Oge |
author_sort | Grunhut, Joel |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: As medicine and the delivery of healthcare enters the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the need for competent human–machine interaction to aid clinical decisions will rise. Medical students need to be sufficiently proficient in AI, its advantages to improve healthcare's expenses, quality, and access. Similarly, students must be educated about the shortfalls of AI such as bias, transparency, and liability. Overlooking a technology that will be transformative for the foreseeable future would place medical students at a disadvantage. However, there has been little interest in researching a proper method to implement AI in the medical education curriculum. This study aims to review the current literature that covers the attitudes of medical students towards AI, implementation of AI in the medical curriculum, and describe the need for more research in this area. METHODS: An integrative review was performed to combine data from various research designs and literature. Pubmed, Medline (Ovid), GoogleScholar, and Web of Science articles between 2010 and 2020 were all searched with particular inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full text of the selected articles was analyzed using the Extension of Technology Acceptance Model and the Diffusions of Innovations theory. Data were successively pooled together, recorded, and analyzed quantitatively using a modified Hawkings evaluation form. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was utilized to help improve reporting. RESULTS: A total of 39 articles meeting inclusion criteria were identified. Primary assessments of medical students attitudes were identified (n = 5). Plans to implement AI in the curriculum for the purpose of teaching students about AI (n = 6) and articles reporting actual implemented changes (n = 2) were assessed. Finally, 26 articles described the need for more research on this topic or calling for the need of change in medical curriculum to anticipate AI in healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: There are few plans or implementations reported on how to incorporate AI in the medical curriculum. Medical schools must work together to create a longitudinal study and initiative on how to successfully equip medical students with knowledge in AI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8580487 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85804872021-11-11 Educating Future Physicians in Artificial Intelligence (AI): An Integrative Review and Proposed Changes Grunhut, Joel Wyatt, Adam TM Marques, Oge J Med Educ Curric Dev Review BACKGROUND: As medicine and the delivery of healthcare enters the age of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the need for competent human–machine interaction to aid clinical decisions will rise. Medical students need to be sufficiently proficient in AI, its advantages to improve healthcare's expenses, quality, and access. Similarly, students must be educated about the shortfalls of AI such as bias, transparency, and liability. Overlooking a technology that will be transformative for the foreseeable future would place medical students at a disadvantage. However, there has been little interest in researching a proper method to implement AI in the medical education curriculum. This study aims to review the current literature that covers the attitudes of medical students towards AI, implementation of AI in the medical curriculum, and describe the need for more research in this area. METHODS: An integrative review was performed to combine data from various research designs and literature. Pubmed, Medline (Ovid), GoogleScholar, and Web of Science articles between 2010 and 2020 were all searched with particular inclusion and exclusion criteria. Full text of the selected articles was analyzed using the Extension of Technology Acceptance Model and the Diffusions of Innovations theory. Data were successively pooled together, recorded, and analyzed quantitatively using a modified Hawkings evaluation form. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was utilized to help improve reporting. RESULTS: A total of 39 articles meeting inclusion criteria were identified. Primary assessments of medical students attitudes were identified (n = 5). Plans to implement AI in the curriculum for the purpose of teaching students about AI (n = 6) and articles reporting actual implemented changes (n = 2) were assessed. Finally, 26 articles described the need for more research on this topic or calling for the need of change in medical curriculum to anticipate AI in healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: There are few plans or implementations reported on how to incorporate AI in the medical curriculum. Medical schools must work together to create a longitudinal study and initiative on how to successfully equip medical students with knowledge in AI. SAGE Publications 2021-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8580487/ /pubmed/34778562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205211036836 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Grunhut, Joel Wyatt, Adam TM Marques, Oge Educating Future Physicians in Artificial Intelligence (AI): An Integrative Review and Proposed Changes |
title | Educating Future Physicians in Artificial Intelligence (AI): An Integrative Review and Proposed Changes |
title_full | Educating Future Physicians in Artificial Intelligence (AI): An Integrative Review and Proposed Changes |
title_fullStr | Educating Future Physicians in Artificial Intelligence (AI): An Integrative Review and Proposed Changes |
title_full_unstemmed | Educating Future Physicians in Artificial Intelligence (AI): An Integrative Review and Proposed Changes |
title_short | Educating Future Physicians in Artificial Intelligence (AI): An Integrative Review and Proposed Changes |
title_sort | educating future physicians in artificial intelligence (ai): an integrative review and proposed changes |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34778562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23821205211036836 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grunhutjoel educatingfuturephysiciansinartificialintelligenceaianintegrativereviewandproposedchanges AT wyattadamtm educatingfuturephysiciansinartificialintelligenceaianintegrativereviewandproposedchanges AT marquesoge educatingfuturephysiciansinartificialintelligenceaianintegrativereviewandproposedchanges |