Cargando…

Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study

OBJECTIVE: To forward the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based distance between the deepest tumor invasion and mesorectal fascia (DMRF), and to explore its prognosis differentiation value in cT3 stage rectal cancer with comparison of cT3 substage. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter coh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiaoyan, Lu, Qiaoyuan, Guo, Xiangjie, Cao, Wuteng, Zhang, Hongmei, Yu, Tao, Li, Xiaoting, Guan, Zhen, Li, Xueping, Sun, Ruijia, Sun, Yingshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34815634
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.05.07
_version_ 1784596676287135744
author Zhang, Xiaoyan
Lu, Qiaoyuan
Guo, Xiangjie
Cao, Wuteng
Zhang, Hongmei
Yu, Tao
Li, Xiaoting
Guan, Zhen
Li, Xueping
Sun, Ruijia
Sun, Yingshi
author_facet Zhang, Xiaoyan
Lu, Qiaoyuan
Guo, Xiangjie
Cao, Wuteng
Zhang, Hongmei
Yu, Tao
Li, Xiaoting
Guan, Zhen
Li, Xueping
Sun, Ruijia
Sun, Yingshi
author_sort Zhang, Xiaoyan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To forward the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based distance between the deepest tumor invasion and mesorectal fascia (DMRF), and to explore its prognosis differentiation value in cT3 stage rectal cancer with comparison of cT3 substage. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study including cT3 rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery from January 2013 to September 2014. DMRF and cT3 substage were evaluated from baseline MRI. The cutoff of DMRF was determined by disease progression. Multivariate cox regression was used to test the prognostic values of baseline variables. RESULTS: A total of 804 patients were included, of which 226 (28.1%) developed progression. A DMRF cutoff of 7 mm was chosen. DMRF category, the clock position of the deepest position of tumor invasion (CDTI) and extramural venous invasion (EMVI) were independent predictors for disease progression, and hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.26 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.13−0.56], 1.88 (95% CI, 1.33−2.65) and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.13−2.18), respectively. cT3 substage was not a predictor for disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of DMRF value on baseline MRI can better distinguish cT3 rectal cancer prognosis rather than cT3 substage, and was recommended in clinical evaluation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8580799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85807992021-11-22 Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study Zhang, Xiaoyan Lu, Qiaoyuan Guo, Xiangjie Cao, Wuteng Zhang, Hongmei Yu, Tao Li, Xiaoting Guan, Zhen Li, Xueping Sun, Ruijia Sun, Yingshi Chin J Cancer Res Original Article OBJECTIVE: To forward the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based distance between the deepest tumor invasion and mesorectal fascia (DMRF), and to explore its prognosis differentiation value in cT3 stage rectal cancer with comparison of cT3 substage. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study including cT3 rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery from January 2013 to September 2014. DMRF and cT3 substage were evaluated from baseline MRI. The cutoff of DMRF was determined by disease progression. Multivariate cox regression was used to test the prognostic values of baseline variables. RESULTS: A total of 804 patients were included, of which 226 (28.1%) developed progression. A DMRF cutoff of 7 mm was chosen. DMRF category, the clock position of the deepest position of tumor invasion (CDTI) and extramural venous invasion (EMVI) were independent predictors for disease progression, and hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.26 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.13−0.56], 1.88 (95% CI, 1.33−2.65) and 1.57 (95% CI, 1.13−2.18), respectively. cT3 substage was not a predictor for disease progression. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of DMRF value on baseline MRI can better distinguish cT3 rectal cancer prognosis rather than cT3 substage, and was recommended in clinical evaluation. AME Publishing Company 2021-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8580799/ /pubmed/34815634 http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.05.07 Text en Copyright ©2021Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Xiaoyan
Lu, Qiaoyuan
Guo, Xiangjie
Cao, Wuteng
Zhang, Hongmei
Yu, Tao
Li, Xiaoting
Guan, Zhen
Li, Xueping
Sun, Ruijia
Sun, Yingshi
Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study
title Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study
title_full Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study
title_fullStr Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study
title_full_unstemmed Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study
title_short Better prognostic determination of cT3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: A multicenter study
title_sort better prognostic determination of ct3 rectal cancer through measurement of distance to mesorectal fascia: a multicenter study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34815634
http://dx.doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.05.07
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiaoyan betterprognosticdeterminationofct3rectalcancerthroughmeasurementofdistancetomesorectalfasciaamulticenterstudy
AT luqiaoyuan betterprognosticdeterminationofct3rectalcancerthroughmeasurementofdistancetomesorectalfasciaamulticenterstudy
AT guoxiangjie betterprognosticdeterminationofct3rectalcancerthroughmeasurementofdistancetomesorectalfasciaamulticenterstudy
AT caowuteng betterprognosticdeterminationofct3rectalcancerthroughmeasurementofdistancetomesorectalfasciaamulticenterstudy
AT zhanghongmei betterprognosticdeterminationofct3rectalcancerthroughmeasurementofdistancetomesorectalfasciaamulticenterstudy
AT yutao betterprognosticdeterminationofct3rectalcancerthroughmeasurementofdistancetomesorectalfasciaamulticenterstudy
AT lixiaoting betterprognosticdeterminationofct3rectalcancerthroughmeasurementofdistancetomesorectalfasciaamulticenterstudy
AT guanzhen betterprognosticdeterminationofct3rectalcancerthroughmeasurementofdistancetomesorectalfasciaamulticenterstudy
AT lixueping betterprognosticdeterminationofct3rectalcancerthroughmeasurementofdistancetomesorectalfasciaamulticenterstudy
AT sunruijia betterprognosticdeterminationofct3rectalcancerthroughmeasurementofdistancetomesorectalfasciaamulticenterstudy
AT sunyingshi betterprognosticdeterminationofct3rectalcancerthroughmeasurementofdistancetomesorectalfasciaamulticenterstudy