Cargando…

Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies

BACKGROUND: The possibility of using noninvasive brain stimulation to treat mental disorders has received considerable attention recently. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are considered to be effective treatments for depressive s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vergallito, Alessandra, Gallucci, Alessia, Pisoni, Alberto, Punzi, Mariacristina, Caselli, Gabriele, Ruggiero, Giovanni M., Sassaroli, Sandra, Romero Lauro, Leonor J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Joule Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/jpn.210050
_version_ 1784596683507630080
author Vergallito, Alessandra
Gallucci, Alessia
Pisoni, Alberto
Punzi, Mariacristina
Caselli, Gabriele
Ruggiero, Giovanni M.
Sassaroli, Sandra
Romero Lauro, Leonor J.
author_facet Vergallito, Alessandra
Gallucci, Alessia
Pisoni, Alberto
Punzi, Mariacristina
Caselli, Gabriele
Ruggiero, Giovanni M.
Sassaroli, Sandra
Romero Lauro, Leonor J.
author_sort Vergallito, Alessandra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The possibility of using noninvasive brain stimulation to treat mental disorders has received considerable attention recently. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are considered to be effective treatments for depressive symptoms. However, no treatment recommendation is currently available for anxiety disorders, suggesting that evidence is still limited. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and a quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of rTMS and tDCS in the treatment of anxiety disorders. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we screened 3 electronic databases up to the end of February 2020 for English-language, peer-reviewed articles that included the following: a clinical sample of patients with an anxiety disorder, the use of a noninvasive brain stimulation technique, the inclusion of a control condition, and pre/post scores on a validated questionnaire that measured symptoms of anxiety. RESULTS: Eleven papers met the inclusion criteria, comprising 154 participants assigned to a stimulation condition and 164 to a sham or control group. We calculated Hedge’s g for scores on disorder-specific and general anxiety questionnaires before and after treatment to determine effect size, and we conducted 2 independent random-effects meta-analyses. Considering the well-known comorbidity between anxiety and depression, we ran a third meta-analysis analyzing outcomes for depression scores. Results showed a significant effect of noninvasive brain stimulation in reducing scores on disorder-specific and general anxiety questionnaires, as well as depressive symptoms, in the real stimulation compared to the control condition. LIMITATIONS: Few studies met the inclusion criteria; more evidence is needed to strengthen conclusions about the effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that noninvasive brain stimulation reduced anxiety and depression scores compared to control conditions, suggesting that it can alleviate clinical symptoms in patients with anxiety disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8580831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher CMA Joule Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85808312021-11-13 Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies Vergallito, Alessandra Gallucci, Alessia Pisoni, Alberto Punzi, Mariacristina Caselli, Gabriele Ruggiero, Giovanni M. Sassaroli, Sandra Romero Lauro, Leonor J. J Psychiatry Neurosci Research Paper BACKGROUND: The possibility of using noninvasive brain stimulation to treat mental disorders has received considerable attention recently. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are considered to be effective treatments for depressive symptoms. However, no treatment recommendation is currently available for anxiety disorders, suggesting that evidence is still limited. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and a quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of rTMS and tDCS in the treatment of anxiety disorders. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we screened 3 electronic databases up to the end of February 2020 for English-language, peer-reviewed articles that included the following: a clinical sample of patients with an anxiety disorder, the use of a noninvasive brain stimulation technique, the inclusion of a control condition, and pre/post scores on a validated questionnaire that measured symptoms of anxiety. RESULTS: Eleven papers met the inclusion criteria, comprising 154 participants assigned to a stimulation condition and 164 to a sham or control group. We calculated Hedge’s g for scores on disorder-specific and general anxiety questionnaires before and after treatment to determine effect size, and we conducted 2 independent random-effects meta-analyses. Considering the well-known comorbidity between anxiety and depression, we ran a third meta-analysis analyzing outcomes for depression scores. Results showed a significant effect of noninvasive brain stimulation in reducing scores on disorder-specific and general anxiety questionnaires, as well as depressive symptoms, in the real stimulation compared to the control condition. LIMITATIONS: Few studies met the inclusion criteria; more evidence is needed to strengthen conclusions about the effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that noninvasive brain stimulation reduced anxiety and depression scores compared to control conditions, suggesting that it can alleviate clinical symptoms in patients with anxiety disorders. CMA Joule Inc. 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8580831/ /pubmed/34753789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/jpn.210050 Text en © 2021 CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Research Paper
Vergallito, Alessandra
Gallucci, Alessia
Pisoni, Alberto
Punzi, Mariacristina
Caselli, Gabriele
Ruggiero, Giovanni M.
Sassaroli, Sandra
Romero Lauro, Leonor J.
Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies
title Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies
title_full Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies
title_fullStr Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies
title_short Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies
title_sort effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753789
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/jpn.210050
work_keys_str_mv AT vergallitoalessandra effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies
AT galluccialessia effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies
AT pisonialberto effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies
AT punzimariacristina effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies
AT caselligabriele effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies
AT ruggierogiovannim effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies
AT sassarolisandra effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies
AT romerolauroleonorj effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies