Cargando…
Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies
BACKGROUND: The possibility of using noninvasive brain stimulation to treat mental disorders has received considerable attention recently. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are considered to be effective treatments for depressive s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CMA Joule Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/jpn.210050 |
_version_ | 1784596683507630080 |
---|---|
author | Vergallito, Alessandra Gallucci, Alessia Pisoni, Alberto Punzi, Mariacristina Caselli, Gabriele Ruggiero, Giovanni M. Sassaroli, Sandra Romero Lauro, Leonor J. |
author_facet | Vergallito, Alessandra Gallucci, Alessia Pisoni, Alberto Punzi, Mariacristina Caselli, Gabriele Ruggiero, Giovanni M. Sassaroli, Sandra Romero Lauro, Leonor J. |
author_sort | Vergallito, Alessandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The possibility of using noninvasive brain stimulation to treat mental disorders has received considerable attention recently. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are considered to be effective treatments for depressive symptoms. However, no treatment recommendation is currently available for anxiety disorders, suggesting that evidence is still limited. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and a quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of rTMS and tDCS in the treatment of anxiety disorders. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we screened 3 electronic databases up to the end of February 2020 for English-language, peer-reviewed articles that included the following: a clinical sample of patients with an anxiety disorder, the use of a noninvasive brain stimulation technique, the inclusion of a control condition, and pre/post scores on a validated questionnaire that measured symptoms of anxiety. RESULTS: Eleven papers met the inclusion criteria, comprising 154 participants assigned to a stimulation condition and 164 to a sham or control group. We calculated Hedge’s g for scores on disorder-specific and general anxiety questionnaires before and after treatment to determine effect size, and we conducted 2 independent random-effects meta-analyses. Considering the well-known comorbidity between anxiety and depression, we ran a third meta-analysis analyzing outcomes for depression scores. Results showed a significant effect of noninvasive brain stimulation in reducing scores on disorder-specific and general anxiety questionnaires, as well as depressive symptoms, in the real stimulation compared to the control condition. LIMITATIONS: Few studies met the inclusion criteria; more evidence is needed to strengthen conclusions about the effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that noninvasive brain stimulation reduced anxiety and depression scores compared to control conditions, suggesting that it can alleviate clinical symptoms in patients with anxiety disorders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8580831 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | CMA Joule Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85808312021-11-13 Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies Vergallito, Alessandra Gallucci, Alessia Pisoni, Alberto Punzi, Mariacristina Caselli, Gabriele Ruggiero, Giovanni M. Sassaroli, Sandra Romero Lauro, Leonor J. J Psychiatry Neurosci Research Paper BACKGROUND: The possibility of using noninvasive brain stimulation to treat mental disorders has received considerable attention recently. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are considered to be effective treatments for depressive symptoms. However, no treatment recommendation is currently available for anxiety disorders, suggesting that evidence is still limited. We conducted a systematic review of the literature and a quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of rTMS and tDCS in the treatment of anxiety disorders. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we screened 3 electronic databases up to the end of February 2020 for English-language, peer-reviewed articles that included the following: a clinical sample of patients with an anxiety disorder, the use of a noninvasive brain stimulation technique, the inclusion of a control condition, and pre/post scores on a validated questionnaire that measured symptoms of anxiety. RESULTS: Eleven papers met the inclusion criteria, comprising 154 participants assigned to a stimulation condition and 164 to a sham or control group. We calculated Hedge’s g for scores on disorder-specific and general anxiety questionnaires before and after treatment to determine effect size, and we conducted 2 independent random-effects meta-analyses. Considering the well-known comorbidity between anxiety and depression, we ran a third meta-analysis analyzing outcomes for depression scores. Results showed a significant effect of noninvasive brain stimulation in reducing scores on disorder-specific and general anxiety questionnaires, as well as depressive symptoms, in the real stimulation compared to the control condition. LIMITATIONS: Few studies met the inclusion criteria; more evidence is needed to strengthen conclusions about the effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that noninvasive brain stimulation reduced anxiety and depression scores compared to control conditions, suggesting that it can alleviate clinical symptoms in patients with anxiety disorders. CMA Joule Inc. 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8580831/ /pubmed/34753789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/jpn.210050 Text en © 2021 CMA Joule Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Vergallito, Alessandra Gallucci, Alessia Pisoni, Alberto Punzi, Mariacristina Caselli, Gabriele Ruggiero, Giovanni M. Sassaroli, Sandra Romero Lauro, Leonor J. Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies |
title | Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies |
title_full | Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies |
title_short | Effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies |
title_sort | effectiveness of noninvasive brain stimulation in the treatment of anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis of sham or behaviour-controlled studies |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580831/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34753789 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/jpn.210050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vergallitoalessandra effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies AT galluccialessia effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies AT pisonialberto effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies AT punzimariacristina effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies AT caselligabriele effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies AT ruggierogiovannim effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies AT sassarolisandra effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies AT romerolauroleonorj effectivenessofnoninvasivebrainstimulationinthetreatmentofanxietydisordersametaanalysisofshamorbehaviourcontrolledstudies |