Cargando…

Evaluation of inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions

PURPOSE: Accurate identification of metastatic lesions is important for improvement in biomechanical models that calculate the fracture risk of metastatic bones. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ataei, Ali, Eggermont, Florieke, Baars, Milan, van der Linden, Yvette, de Rooy, Jacky, Verdonschot, Nico, Tanck, Esther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02450-w
_version_ 1784596706786017280
author Ataei, Ali
Eggermont, Florieke
Baars, Milan
van der Linden, Yvette
de Rooy, Jacky
Verdonschot, Nico
Tanck, Esther
author_facet Ataei, Ali
Eggermont, Florieke
Baars, Milan
van der Linden, Yvette
de Rooy, Jacky
Verdonschot, Nico
Tanck, Esther
author_sort Ataei, Ali
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Accurate identification of metastatic lesions is important for improvement in biomechanical models that calculate the fracture risk of metastatic bones. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions. METHODS: CT scans of 54 metastatic femurs (19 osteolytic, 17 osteoblastic, and 18 mixed) were segmented two times by two operators. Dice coefficients (DCs) were calculated adopting the quantification that a DC˃0.7 indicates good reliability. RESULTS: Generally, rather poor inter- and intra-operator reliability of lesion segmentation were found. Inter-operator DCs were 0.54 (± 0.28) and 0.50 (± 0.32) for the first and second segmentations, respectively, whereas intra-operator DCs were 0.56 (± 0.28) for operator I and 0.71 (± 0.23) for operator II. Larger lesions scored significantly higher DCs in comparison with smaller lesions. Of the femurs with larger mean segmentation volumes, 83% and 93% were segmented with good inter- and intra-operator DCs (> 0.7), respectively. There was no difference between the mean DCs of osteolytic, osteoblastic, and mixed lesions. CONCLUSION: Manual segmentation of femoral bone metastases is very challenging and resulted in unsatisfactory mean reliability values. There is a need for development of a segmentation protocol to reduce the inter- and intra-operator segmentation variation as the first step and use of computer-assisted segmentation tools as a second step as this study shows that manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions is highly challenging. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11548-021-02450-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8580934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85809342021-11-15 Evaluation of inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions Ataei, Ali Eggermont, Florieke Baars, Milan van der Linden, Yvette de Rooy, Jacky Verdonschot, Nico Tanck, Esther Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Accurate identification of metastatic lesions is important for improvement in biomechanical models that calculate the fracture risk of metastatic bones. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions. METHODS: CT scans of 54 metastatic femurs (19 osteolytic, 17 osteoblastic, and 18 mixed) were segmented two times by two operators. Dice coefficients (DCs) were calculated adopting the quantification that a DC˃0.7 indicates good reliability. RESULTS: Generally, rather poor inter- and intra-operator reliability of lesion segmentation were found. Inter-operator DCs were 0.54 (± 0.28) and 0.50 (± 0.32) for the first and second segmentations, respectively, whereas intra-operator DCs were 0.56 (± 0.28) for operator I and 0.71 (± 0.23) for operator II. Larger lesions scored significantly higher DCs in comparison with smaller lesions. Of the femurs with larger mean segmentation volumes, 83% and 93% were segmented with good inter- and intra-operator DCs (> 0.7), respectively. There was no difference between the mean DCs of osteolytic, osteoblastic, and mixed lesions. CONCLUSION: Manual segmentation of femoral bone metastases is very challenging and resulted in unsatisfactory mean reliability values. There is a need for development of a segmentation protocol to reduce the inter- and intra-operator segmentation variation as the first step and use of computer-assisted segmentation tools as a second step as this study shows that manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions is highly challenging. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11548-021-02450-w. Springer International Publishing 2021-07-15 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8580934/ /pubmed/34268665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02450-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Ataei, Ali
Eggermont, Florieke
Baars, Milan
van der Linden, Yvette
de Rooy, Jacky
Verdonschot, Nico
Tanck, Esther
Evaluation of inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions
title Evaluation of inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions
title_full Evaluation of inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions
title_fullStr Evaluation of inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions
title_short Evaluation of inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions
title_sort evaluation of inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34268665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-021-02450-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ataeiali evaluationofinterandintraoperatorreliabilityofmanualsegmentationoffemoralmetastaticlesions
AT eggermontflorieke evaluationofinterandintraoperatorreliabilityofmanualsegmentationoffemoralmetastaticlesions
AT baarsmilan evaluationofinterandintraoperatorreliabilityofmanualsegmentationoffemoralmetastaticlesions
AT vanderlindenyvette evaluationofinterandintraoperatorreliabilityofmanualsegmentationoffemoralmetastaticlesions
AT derooyjacky evaluationofinterandintraoperatorreliabilityofmanualsegmentationoffemoralmetastaticlesions
AT verdonschotnico evaluationofinterandintraoperatorreliabilityofmanualsegmentationoffemoralmetastaticlesions
AT tanckesther evaluationofinterandintraoperatorreliabilityofmanualsegmentationoffemoralmetastaticlesions