Cargando…

Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study

It is a serious problem when people with mental disorders avoid, delay, discontinue, or do not use treatment and support, despite the existence of evidence-based treatment and support methods. In this study, we aimed to clarify the factor structure of BACE v3, a scale to measure barriers to accessin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hongo, Minako, Oshima, Fumiyo, Nishinaka, Hirofumi, Seto, Mikuko, Ohtani, Toshiyuki, Shimizu, Eiji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8581348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777164
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760184
_version_ 1784596788067434496
author Hongo, Minako
Oshima, Fumiyo
Nishinaka, Hirofumi
Seto, Mikuko
Ohtani, Toshiyuki
Shimizu, Eiji
author_facet Hongo, Minako
Oshima, Fumiyo
Nishinaka, Hirofumi
Seto, Mikuko
Ohtani, Toshiyuki
Shimizu, Eiji
author_sort Hongo, Minako
collection PubMed
description It is a serious problem when people with mental disorders avoid, delay, discontinue, or do not use treatment and support, despite the existence of evidence-based treatment and support methods. In this study, we aimed to clarify the factor structure of BACE v3, a scale to measure barriers to accessing mental health care, and to examine its reliability and validity among Japanese people with mental disorders. An online survey with 268 participants, 20 years old and over, who had received care from mental health services in the past 12 months was conducted. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA) were used to examine the structure of the BACE v3. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of all subscales were examined. Convergent validity [correlation of one of the subscales of the BACE v3, the treatment stigma subscale with the Stigma Scale for Receiving Psychological Help (SSRPH) and with the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI)] was assessed. EFA identified two factors (treatment stigma and non-stigma), and the results suggested that the factor structure of the Japanese version of BACE v3 was similar to the original 2-factor structure. Regarding the CFA result, the goodness-of-fit indices showed marginal fit (root mean square error of approximation = 0.087; Tucker–Lewis index = 0.842; standardized root mean square residual = 0.078; comparative fit index = 0.86). The internal consistency of the treatment stigma subscale was α = 0.90, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.76 (confidence interval: 0.70–0.81). The internal consistency of the non-stigma subscale was α = 0.83, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.64 (confidence interval: 0.56–0.71). The score of the treatment stigma subscale was significantly and positively correlated with the SSRPH and ISMI. Thus, the BACE v3 has acceptable consistency, reliability and validity for the assessment of barriers to accessing mental health care including treatment stigma among people with mental disorders in Japan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8581348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85813482021-11-12 Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study Hongo, Minako Oshima, Fumiyo Nishinaka, Hirofumi Seto, Mikuko Ohtani, Toshiyuki Shimizu, Eiji Front Psychol Psychology It is a serious problem when people with mental disorders avoid, delay, discontinue, or do not use treatment and support, despite the existence of evidence-based treatment and support methods. In this study, we aimed to clarify the factor structure of BACE v3, a scale to measure barriers to accessing mental health care, and to examine its reliability and validity among Japanese people with mental disorders. An online survey with 268 participants, 20 years old and over, who had received care from mental health services in the past 12 months was conducted. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA) were used to examine the structure of the BACE v3. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of all subscales were examined. Convergent validity [correlation of one of the subscales of the BACE v3, the treatment stigma subscale with the Stigma Scale for Receiving Psychological Help (SSRPH) and with the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI)] was assessed. EFA identified two factors (treatment stigma and non-stigma), and the results suggested that the factor structure of the Japanese version of BACE v3 was similar to the original 2-factor structure. Regarding the CFA result, the goodness-of-fit indices showed marginal fit (root mean square error of approximation = 0.087; Tucker–Lewis index = 0.842; standardized root mean square residual = 0.078; comparative fit index = 0.86). The internal consistency of the treatment stigma subscale was α = 0.90, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.76 (confidence interval: 0.70–0.81). The internal consistency of the non-stigma subscale was α = 0.83, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.64 (confidence interval: 0.56–0.71). The score of the treatment stigma subscale was significantly and positively correlated with the SSRPH and ISMI. Thus, the BACE v3 has acceptable consistency, reliability and validity for the assessment of barriers to accessing mental health care including treatment stigma among people with mental disorders in Japan. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8581348/ /pubmed/34777164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760184 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hongo, Oshima, Nishinaka, Seto, Ohtani and Shimizu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hongo, Minako
Oshima, Fumiyo
Nishinaka, Hirofumi
Seto, Mikuko
Ohtani, Toshiyuki
Shimizu, Eiji
Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study
title Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study
title_full Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study
title_fullStr Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study
title_short Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study
title_sort reliability and validity of the japanese version of the barriers to access to care evaluation scale version 3 for people with mental disorders: an online survey study
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8581348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777164
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760184
work_keys_str_mv AT hongominako reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthebarrierstoaccesstocareevaluationscaleversion3forpeoplewithmentaldisordersanonlinesurveystudy
AT oshimafumiyo reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthebarrierstoaccesstocareevaluationscaleversion3forpeoplewithmentaldisordersanonlinesurveystudy
AT nishinakahirofumi reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthebarrierstoaccesstocareevaluationscaleversion3forpeoplewithmentaldisordersanonlinesurveystudy
AT setomikuko reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthebarrierstoaccesstocareevaluationscaleversion3forpeoplewithmentaldisordersanonlinesurveystudy
AT ohtanitoshiyuki reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthebarrierstoaccesstocareevaluationscaleversion3forpeoplewithmentaldisordersanonlinesurveystudy
AT shimizueiji reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthebarrierstoaccesstocareevaluationscaleversion3forpeoplewithmentaldisordersanonlinesurveystudy