Cargando…
Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study
It is a serious problem when people with mental disorders avoid, delay, discontinue, or do not use treatment and support, despite the existence of evidence-based treatment and support methods. In this study, we aimed to clarify the factor structure of BACE v3, a scale to measure barriers to accessin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8581348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760184 |
_version_ | 1784596788067434496 |
---|---|
author | Hongo, Minako Oshima, Fumiyo Nishinaka, Hirofumi Seto, Mikuko Ohtani, Toshiyuki Shimizu, Eiji |
author_facet | Hongo, Minako Oshima, Fumiyo Nishinaka, Hirofumi Seto, Mikuko Ohtani, Toshiyuki Shimizu, Eiji |
author_sort | Hongo, Minako |
collection | PubMed |
description | It is a serious problem when people with mental disorders avoid, delay, discontinue, or do not use treatment and support, despite the existence of evidence-based treatment and support methods. In this study, we aimed to clarify the factor structure of BACE v3, a scale to measure barriers to accessing mental health care, and to examine its reliability and validity among Japanese people with mental disorders. An online survey with 268 participants, 20 years old and over, who had received care from mental health services in the past 12 months was conducted. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA) were used to examine the structure of the BACE v3. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of all subscales were examined. Convergent validity [correlation of one of the subscales of the BACE v3, the treatment stigma subscale with the Stigma Scale for Receiving Psychological Help (SSRPH) and with the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI)] was assessed. EFA identified two factors (treatment stigma and non-stigma), and the results suggested that the factor structure of the Japanese version of BACE v3 was similar to the original 2-factor structure. Regarding the CFA result, the goodness-of-fit indices showed marginal fit (root mean square error of approximation = 0.087; Tucker–Lewis index = 0.842; standardized root mean square residual = 0.078; comparative fit index = 0.86). The internal consistency of the treatment stigma subscale was α = 0.90, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.76 (confidence interval: 0.70–0.81). The internal consistency of the non-stigma subscale was α = 0.83, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.64 (confidence interval: 0.56–0.71). The score of the treatment stigma subscale was significantly and positively correlated with the SSRPH and ISMI. Thus, the BACE v3 has acceptable consistency, reliability and validity for the assessment of barriers to accessing mental health care including treatment stigma among people with mental disorders in Japan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8581348 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85813482021-11-12 Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study Hongo, Minako Oshima, Fumiyo Nishinaka, Hirofumi Seto, Mikuko Ohtani, Toshiyuki Shimizu, Eiji Front Psychol Psychology It is a serious problem when people with mental disorders avoid, delay, discontinue, or do not use treatment and support, despite the existence of evidence-based treatment and support methods. In this study, we aimed to clarify the factor structure of BACE v3, a scale to measure barriers to accessing mental health care, and to examine its reliability and validity among Japanese people with mental disorders. An online survey with 268 participants, 20 years old and over, who had received care from mental health services in the past 12 months was conducted. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA and CFA) were used to examine the structure of the BACE v3. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of all subscales were examined. Convergent validity [correlation of one of the subscales of the BACE v3, the treatment stigma subscale with the Stigma Scale for Receiving Psychological Help (SSRPH) and with the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI)] was assessed. EFA identified two factors (treatment stigma and non-stigma), and the results suggested that the factor structure of the Japanese version of BACE v3 was similar to the original 2-factor structure. Regarding the CFA result, the goodness-of-fit indices showed marginal fit (root mean square error of approximation = 0.087; Tucker–Lewis index = 0.842; standardized root mean square residual = 0.078; comparative fit index = 0.86). The internal consistency of the treatment stigma subscale was α = 0.90, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.76 (confidence interval: 0.70–0.81). The internal consistency of the non-stigma subscale was α = 0.83, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.64 (confidence interval: 0.56–0.71). The score of the treatment stigma subscale was significantly and positively correlated with the SSRPH and ISMI. Thus, the BACE v3 has acceptable consistency, reliability and validity for the assessment of barriers to accessing mental health care including treatment stigma among people with mental disorders in Japan. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8581348/ /pubmed/34777164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760184 Text en Copyright © 2021 Hongo, Oshima, Nishinaka, Seto, Ohtani and Shimizu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Hongo, Minako Oshima, Fumiyo Nishinaka, Hirofumi Seto, Mikuko Ohtani, Toshiyuki Shimizu, Eiji Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study |
title | Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study |
title_full | Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study |
title_short | Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Barriers to Access to Care Evaluation Scale Version 3 for People With Mental Disorders: an Online Survey Study |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the japanese version of the barriers to access to care evaluation scale version 3 for people with mental disorders: an online survey study |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8581348/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34777164 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.760184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongominako reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthebarrierstoaccesstocareevaluationscaleversion3forpeoplewithmentaldisordersanonlinesurveystudy AT oshimafumiyo reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthebarrierstoaccesstocareevaluationscaleversion3forpeoplewithmentaldisordersanonlinesurveystudy AT nishinakahirofumi reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthebarrierstoaccesstocareevaluationscaleversion3forpeoplewithmentaldisordersanonlinesurveystudy AT setomikuko reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthebarrierstoaccesstocareevaluationscaleversion3forpeoplewithmentaldisordersanonlinesurveystudy AT ohtanitoshiyuki reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthebarrierstoaccesstocareevaluationscaleversion3forpeoplewithmentaldisordersanonlinesurveystudy AT shimizueiji reliabilityandvalidityofthejapaneseversionofthebarrierstoaccesstocareevaluationscaleversion3forpeoplewithmentaldisordersanonlinesurveystudy |