Cargando…

Single Versus Multi-channel Dispersion Analysis of Ultrasonic Guided Waves Propagating in Long Bones

Ultrasonic guided wave techniques have been applied to characterize cortical bone for osteoporosis assessment. Compared with the current gold-standard X-ray-based diagnostic methods, ultrasound-based techniques pose some advantages such as compactness, low cost, lack of ionizing radiation, and their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tran, Tho N. H. T., He, Feng, Zhang, Zhenggang, Sacchi, Mauricio D., Ta, Dean, Le, Lawrence H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8581725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33840327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01617346211006660
_version_ 1784596867016818688
author Tran, Tho N. H. T.
He, Feng
Zhang, Zhenggang
Sacchi, Mauricio D.
Ta, Dean
Le, Lawrence H.
author_facet Tran, Tho N. H. T.
He, Feng
Zhang, Zhenggang
Sacchi, Mauricio D.
Ta, Dean
Le, Lawrence H.
author_sort Tran, Tho N. H. T.
collection PubMed
description Ultrasonic guided wave techniques have been applied to characterize cortical bone for osteoporosis assessment. Compared with the current gold-standard X-ray-based diagnostic methods, ultrasound-based techniques pose some advantages such as compactness, low cost, lack of ionizing radiation, and their ability to detect the mechanical properties of the cortex. Axial transmission technique with a source-receiver offset is employed to acquire the ultrasound data. The dispersion characteristics of the guided waves in bones are normally analyzed in the transformed domains using the dispersion curves. The transformed domain can be time-frequency map using a single channel or wavenumber-frequency (or phase velocity-frequency) map with multi-channels. In terms of acquisition effort, the first method is more cost- and time-effective than the latter. However, it remains unclear whether single-channel dispersion analysis can provide as much quantitative guided-wave information as the multi-channel analysis. The objective of this study is to compare the two methods using numerically simulated and ex vivo data of a simple bovine bone plate and explore their advantages and disadvantages. Both single- and multi-channel signal processing approaches are implemented using sparsity-constrained optimization algorithms to reinforce the focusing power. While the single-channel data acquisition and processing are much faster than those of the multi-channel, modal identification and analysis of the multi-channel data are straightforward and more convincing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8581725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85817252021-11-12 Single Versus Multi-channel Dispersion Analysis of Ultrasonic Guided Waves Propagating in Long Bones Tran, Tho N. H. T. He, Feng Zhang, Zhenggang Sacchi, Mauricio D. Ta, Dean Le, Lawrence H. Ultrason Imaging Research Note Ultrasonic guided wave techniques have been applied to characterize cortical bone for osteoporosis assessment. Compared with the current gold-standard X-ray-based diagnostic methods, ultrasound-based techniques pose some advantages such as compactness, low cost, lack of ionizing radiation, and their ability to detect the mechanical properties of the cortex. Axial transmission technique with a source-receiver offset is employed to acquire the ultrasound data. The dispersion characteristics of the guided waves in bones are normally analyzed in the transformed domains using the dispersion curves. The transformed domain can be time-frequency map using a single channel or wavenumber-frequency (or phase velocity-frequency) map with multi-channels. In terms of acquisition effort, the first method is more cost- and time-effective than the latter. However, it remains unclear whether single-channel dispersion analysis can provide as much quantitative guided-wave information as the multi-channel analysis. The objective of this study is to compare the two methods using numerically simulated and ex vivo data of a simple bovine bone plate and explore their advantages and disadvantages. Both single- and multi-channel signal processing approaches are implemented using sparsity-constrained optimization algorithms to reinforce the focusing power. While the single-channel data acquisition and processing are much faster than those of the multi-channel, modal identification and analysis of the multi-channel data are straightforward and more convincing. SAGE Publications 2021-04-12 2021-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8581725/ /pubmed/33840327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01617346211006660 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Research Note
Tran, Tho N. H. T.
He, Feng
Zhang, Zhenggang
Sacchi, Mauricio D.
Ta, Dean
Le, Lawrence H.
Single Versus Multi-channel Dispersion Analysis of Ultrasonic Guided Waves Propagating in Long Bones
title Single Versus Multi-channel Dispersion Analysis of Ultrasonic Guided Waves Propagating in Long Bones
title_full Single Versus Multi-channel Dispersion Analysis of Ultrasonic Guided Waves Propagating in Long Bones
title_fullStr Single Versus Multi-channel Dispersion Analysis of Ultrasonic Guided Waves Propagating in Long Bones
title_full_unstemmed Single Versus Multi-channel Dispersion Analysis of Ultrasonic Guided Waves Propagating in Long Bones
title_short Single Versus Multi-channel Dispersion Analysis of Ultrasonic Guided Waves Propagating in Long Bones
title_sort single versus multi-channel dispersion analysis of ultrasonic guided waves propagating in long bones
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8581725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33840327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01617346211006660
work_keys_str_mv AT tranthonht singleversusmultichanneldispersionanalysisofultrasonicguidedwavespropagatinginlongbones
AT hefeng singleversusmultichanneldispersionanalysisofultrasonicguidedwavespropagatinginlongbones
AT zhangzhenggang singleversusmultichanneldispersionanalysisofultrasonicguidedwavespropagatinginlongbones
AT sacchimauriciod singleversusmultichanneldispersionanalysisofultrasonicguidedwavespropagatinginlongbones
AT tadean singleversusmultichanneldispersionanalysisofultrasonicguidedwavespropagatinginlongbones
AT lelawrenceh singleversusmultichanneldispersionanalysisofultrasonicguidedwavespropagatinginlongbones