Cargando…
A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Emergency Room Utilization Following Mifepristone Chemical and Surgical Abortions, 1999–2015
INTRODUCTION: Existing research on postabortion emergency room visits is sparse and limited by methods which underestimate the incidence of adverse events following abortion. Postabortion emergency room (ER) use since Food and Drug Administration approval of chemical abortion in 2000 can identify tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8581786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34778493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928211053965 |
_version_ | 1784596880265576448 |
---|---|
author | Studnicki, James Harrison, Donna J. Longbons, Tessa Skop, Ingrid Reardon, David C. Fisher, John W. Tsulukidze, Maka Craver, Christopher |
author_facet | Studnicki, James Harrison, Donna J. Longbons, Tessa Skop, Ingrid Reardon, David C. Fisher, John W. Tsulukidze, Maka Craver, Christopher |
author_sort | Studnicki, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Existing research on postabortion emergency room visits is sparse and limited by methods which underestimate the incidence of adverse events following abortion. Postabortion emergency room (ER) use since Food and Drug Administration approval of chemical abortion in 2000 can identify trends in the relative morbidity burden of chemical versus surgical procedures. OBJECTIVE: To complete the first longitudinal cohort study of postabortion emergency room use following chemical and surgical abortions. METHODS: A population-based longitudinal cohort study of 423 000 confirmed induced abortions and 121,283 subsequent ER visits occurring within 30 days of the procedure, in the years 1999-2015, to Medicaid-eligible women over 13 years of age with at least one pregnancy outcome, in the 17 states which provided public funding for abortion. RESULTS: ER visits are at greater risk to occur following a chemical rather than a surgical abortion: all ER visits (OR 1.22, CL 1.19-1.24); miscoded spontaneous (OR 1.88, CL 1.81-1.96); and abortion-related (OR 1.53, CL 1.49-1.58). ER visit rates per 1000 abortions grew faster for chemical abortions, and by 2015, chemical versus surgical rates were 354.8 versus 357.9 for all ER visits; 31.5 versus 8.6 for miscoded spontaneous abortion visits; and 51.7 versus 22.0 for abortion-related visits. Abortion-related visits as a percent of total visits are twice as high for chemical abortions, reaching 14.6% by 2015. Miscoded spontaneous abortion visits as a percent of total visits are nearly 4 times as high for chemical abortions, reaching 8.9% of total visits and 60.9% of abortion-related visits by 2015. CONCLUSION: The incidence and per-abortion rate of ER visits following any induced abortion are growing, but chemical abortion is consistently and progressively associated with more postabortion ER visit morbidity than surgical abortion. There is also a distinct trend of a growing number of women miscoded as receiving treatment for spontaneous abortion in the ER following a chemical abortion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8581786 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85817862021-11-12 A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Emergency Room Utilization Following Mifepristone Chemical and Surgical Abortions, 1999–2015 Studnicki, James Harrison, Donna J. Longbons, Tessa Skop, Ingrid Reardon, David C. Fisher, John W. Tsulukidze, Maka Craver, Christopher Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Original Research INTRODUCTION: Existing research on postabortion emergency room visits is sparse and limited by methods which underestimate the incidence of adverse events following abortion. Postabortion emergency room (ER) use since Food and Drug Administration approval of chemical abortion in 2000 can identify trends in the relative morbidity burden of chemical versus surgical procedures. OBJECTIVE: To complete the first longitudinal cohort study of postabortion emergency room use following chemical and surgical abortions. METHODS: A population-based longitudinal cohort study of 423 000 confirmed induced abortions and 121,283 subsequent ER visits occurring within 30 days of the procedure, in the years 1999-2015, to Medicaid-eligible women over 13 years of age with at least one pregnancy outcome, in the 17 states which provided public funding for abortion. RESULTS: ER visits are at greater risk to occur following a chemical rather than a surgical abortion: all ER visits (OR 1.22, CL 1.19-1.24); miscoded spontaneous (OR 1.88, CL 1.81-1.96); and abortion-related (OR 1.53, CL 1.49-1.58). ER visit rates per 1000 abortions grew faster for chemical abortions, and by 2015, chemical versus surgical rates were 354.8 versus 357.9 for all ER visits; 31.5 versus 8.6 for miscoded spontaneous abortion visits; and 51.7 versus 22.0 for abortion-related visits. Abortion-related visits as a percent of total visits are twice as high for chemical abortions, reaching 14.6% by 2015. Miscoded spontaneous abortion visits as a percent of total visits are nearly 4 times as high for chemical abortions, reaching 8.9% of total visits and 60.9% of abortion-related visits by 2015. CONCLUSION: The incidence and per-abortion rate of ER visits following any induced abortion are growing, but chemical abortion is consistently and progressively associated with more postabortion ER visit morbidity than surgical abortion. There is also a distinct trend of a growing number of women miscoded as receiving treatment for spontaneous abortion in the ER following a chemical abortion. SAGE Publications 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8581786/ /pubmed/34778493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928211053965 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Studnicki, James Harrison, Donna J. Longbons, Tessa Skop, Ingrid Reardon, David C. Fisher, John W. Tsulukidze, Maka Craver, Christopher A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Emergency Room Utilization Following Mifepristone Chemical and Surgical Abortions, 1999–2015 |
title | A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Emergency Room Utilization Following Mifepristone Chemical and Surgical Abortions, 1999–2015 |
title_full | A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Emergency Room Utilization Following Mifepristone Chemical and Surgical Abortions, 1999–2015 |
title_fullStr | A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Emergency Room Utilization Following Mifepristone Chemical and Surgical Abortions, 1999–2015 |
title_full_unstemmed | A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Emergency Room Utilization Following Mifepristone Chemical and Surgical Abortions, 1999–2015 |
title_short | A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Emergency Room Utilization Following Mifepristone Chemical and Surgical Abortions, 1999–2015 |
title_sort | longitudinal cohort study of emergency room utilization following mifepristone chemical and surgical abortions, 1999–2015 |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8581786/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34778493 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928211053965 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT studnickijames alongitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT harrisondonnaj alongitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT longbonstessa alongitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT skopingrid alongitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT reardondavidc alongitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT fisherjohnw alongitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT tsulukidzemaka alongitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT craverchristopher alongitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT studnickijames longitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT harrisondonnaj longitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT longbonstessa longitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT skopingrid longitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT reardondavidc longitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT fisherjohnw longitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT tsulukidzemaka longitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 AT craverchristopher longitudinalcohortstudyofemergencyroomutilizationfollowingmifepristonechemicalandsurgicalabortions19992015 |