Cargando…

Leucine‐Rich Glioma‐Inactivated 1 versus Contactin‐Associated Protein‐like 2 Antibody Neuropathic Pain: Clinical and Biological Comparisons

Pain is a under‐recognized association of leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated 1 (LGI1) and contactin‐associated protein‐like 2 (CASPR2) antibodies. Of 147 patients with these autoantibodies, pain was experienced by 17 of 33 (52%) with CASPR2‐ versus 20 of 108 (19%) with LGI1 antibodies (p = 0.0005), and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramanathan, Sudarshini, Tseng, Mandy, Davies, Alexander J., Uy, Christopher E., Paneva, Sofija, Mgbachi, Victor C., Michael, Sophia, Varley, James A., Binks, Sophie, Themistocleous, Andreas C., Fehmi, Janev, Anziska, Yaacov, Soni, Anushka, Hofer, Monika, Waters, Patrick, Brilot, Fabienne, Dale, Russell C., Dawes, John, Rinaldi, Simon, Bennett, David L., Irani, Sarosh R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8581990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.26189
_version_ 1784596893651697664
author Ramanathan, Sudarshini
Tseng, Mandy
Davies, Alexander J.
Uy, Christopher E.
Paneva, Sofija
Mgbachi, Victor C.
Michael, Sophia
Varley, James A.
Binks, Sophie
Themistocleous, Andreas C.
Fehmi, Janev
Anziska, Yaacov
Soni, Anushka
Hofer, Monika
Waters, Patrick
Brilot, Fabienne
Dale, Russell C.
Dawes, John
Rinaldi, Simon
Bennett, David L.
Irani, Sarosh R.
author_facet Ramanathan, Sudarshini
Tseng, Mandy
Davies, Alexander J.
Uy, Christopher E.
Paneva, Sofija
Mgbachi, Victor C.
Michael, Sophia
Varley, James A.
Binks, Sophie
Themistocleous, Andreas C.
Fehmi, Janev
Anziska, Yaacov
Soni, Anushka
Hofer, Monika
Waters, Patrick
Brilot, Fabienne
Dale, Russell C.
Dawes, John
Rinaldi, Simon
Bennett, David L.
Irani, Sarosh R.
author_sort Ramanathan, Sudarshini
collection PubMed
description Pain is a under‐recognized association of leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated 1 (LGI1) and contactin‐associated protein‐like 2 (CASPR2) antibodies. Of 147 patients with these autoantibodies, pain was experienced by 17 of 33 (52%) with CASPR2‐ versus 20 of 108 (19%) with LGI1 antibodies (p = 0.0005), and identified as neuropathic in 89% versus 58% of these, respectively. Typically, in both cohorts, normal nerve conduction studies and reduced intraepidermal nerve fiber densities were observed in the sampled patient subsets. In LGI1 antibody patients, pain responded to immunotherapy (p = 0.008), often rapidly, with greater residual patient‐rated impairment observed in CASPR2 antibody patients (p = 0.019). Serum CASPR2 antibodies, but not LGI1 antibodies, bound in vitro to unmyelinated human sensory neurons and rodent dorsal root ganglia, suggesting pathophysiological differences that may underlie our clinical observations. ANN NEUROL 2021;90:683–690
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8581990
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85819902021-11-18 Leucine‐Rich Glioma‐Inactivated 1 versus Contactin‐Associated Protein‐like 2 Antibody Neuropathic Pain: Clinical and Biological Comparisons Ramanathan, Sudarshini Tseng, Mandy Davies, Alexander J. Uy, Christopher E. Paneva, Sofija Mgbachi, Victor C. Michael, Sophia Varley, James A. Binks, Sophie Themistocleous, Andreas C. Fehmi, Janev Anziska, Yaacov Soni, Anushka Hofer, Monika Waters, Patrick Brilot, Fabienne Dale, Russell C. Dawes, John Rinaldi, Simon Bennett, David L. Irani, Sarosh R. Ann Neurol Brief Communication Pain is a under‐recognized association of leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated 1 (LGI1) and contactin‐associated protein‐like 2 (CASPR2) antibodies. Of 147 patients with these autoantibodies, pain was experienced by 17 of 33 (52%) with CASPR2‐ versus 20 of 108 (19%) with LGI1 antibodies (p = 0.0005), and identified as neuropathic in 89% versus 58% of these, respectively. Typically, in both cohorts, normal nerve conduction studies and reduced intraepidermal nerve fiber densities were observed in the sampled patient subsets. In LGI1 antibody patients, pain responded to immunotherapy (p = 0.008), often rapidly, with greater residual patient‐rated impairment observed in CASPR2 antibody patients (p = 0.019). Serum CASPR2 antibodies, but not LGI1 antibodies, bound in vitro to unmyelinated human sensory neurons and rodent dorsal root ganglia, suggesting pathophysiological differences that may underlie our clinical observations. ANN NEUROL 2021;90:683–690 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-08-30 2021-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8581990/ /pubmed/34370313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.26189 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Annals of Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Ramanathan, Sudarshini
Tseng, Mandy
Davies, Alexander J.
Uy, Christopher E.
Paneva, Sofija
Mgbachi, Victor C.
Michael, Sophia
Varley, James A.
Binks, Sophie
Themistocleous, Andreas C.
Fehmi, Janev
Anziska, Yaacov
Soni, Anushka
Hofer, Monika
Waters, Patrick
Brilot, Fabienne
Dale, Russell C.
Dawes, John
Rinaldi, Simon
Bennett, David L.
Irani, Sarosh R.
Leucine‐Rich Glioma‐Inactivated 1 versus Contactin‐Associated Protein‐like 2 Antibody Neuropathic Pain: Clinical and Biological Comparisons
title Leucine‐Rich Glioma‐Inactivated 1 versus Contactin‐Associated Protein‐like 2 Antibody Neuropathic Pain: Clinical and Biological Comparisons
title_full Leucine‐Rich Glioma‐Inactivated 1 versus Contactin‐Associated Protein‐like 2 Antibody Neuropathic Pain: Clinical and Biological Comparisons
title_fullStr Leucine‐Rich Glioma‐Inactivated 1 versus Contactin‐Associated Protein‐like 2 Antibody Neuropathic Pain: Clinical and Biological Comparisons
title_full_unstemmed Leucine‐Rich Glioma‐Inactivated 1 versus Contactin‐Associated Protein‐like 2 Antibody Neuropathic Pain: Clinical and Biological Comparisons
title_short Leucine‐Rich Glioma‐Inactivated 1 versus Contactin‐Associated Protein‐like 2 Antibody Neuropathic Pain: Clinical and Biological Comparisons
title_sort leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated 1 versus contactin‐associated protein‐like 2 antibody neuropathic pain: clinical and biological comparisons
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8581990/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34370313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ana.26189
work_keys_str_mv AT ramanathansudarshini leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT tsengmandy leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT daviesalexanderj leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT uychristophere leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT panevasofija leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT mgbachivictorc leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT michaelsophia leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT varleyjamesa leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT binkssophie leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT themistocleousandreasc leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT fehmijanev leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT anziskayaacov leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT sonianushka leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT hofermonika leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT waterspatrick leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT brilotfabienne leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT dalerussellc leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT dawesjohn leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT rinaldisimon leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT bennettdavidl leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons
AT iranisaroshr leucinerichgliomainactivated1versuscontactinassociatedproteinlike2antibodyneuropathicpainclinicalandbiologicalcomparisons