Cargando…

Gonorrhoea: a systematic review of prevalence reporting globally

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends periodic gonorrhoea prevalence assessments in the general population or proxies thereof (including pregnant women, women attending family planning clinics, military recruits, and men undergoing employment physicals for example) and in popula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whelan, Jane, Abbing-Karahagopian, Victoria, Serino, Laura, Unemo, Magnus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34763670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06381-4
_version_ 1784596936328740864
author Whelan, Jane
Abbing-Karahagopian, Victoria
Serino, Laura
Unemo, Magnus
author_facet Whelan, Jane
Abbing-Karahagopian, Victoria
Serino, Laura
Unemo, Magnus
author_sort Whelan, Jane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends periodic gonorrhoea prevalence assessments in the general population or proxies thereof (including pregnant women, women attending family planning clinics, military recruits, and men undergoing employment physicals for example) and in population groups at increased risk, including men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) and sex workers. METHOD: We evaluated reported prevalence data, including estimates from proxy general population samples to reflect the WHO recommendations. We describe the outcomes from the general population country-by-country and extend previous reviews to include MSM, sex workers, and extragenital infections. RESULT AND CONCLUSION: In our systematic search, 2015 titles were reviewed (January 2010–April 2019) and 174 full-text publications were included. National, population-based prevalence data were identified in only four countries (the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Peru, New Caledonia) and local population-based estimates were reported in areas within five countries (China, South Africa, Brazil, Benin, and Malawi). The remaining studies identified only reported test positivity from non-probability, proxy general population samples. Due to the diversity of the reviewed studies, detailed comparison across studies was not possible. In MSM, data were identified from 64 studies in 25 countries. Rectal infection rates were generally higher than urogenital or pharyngeal infection rates, where extragenital testing was conducted. Data on sex workers were identified from 41 studies in 23 countries; rates in female sex workers were high. Current prevalence monitoring was shown to be highly suboptimal worldwide. Serial prevalence monitoring of critical epidemiological variables, and guidelines to optimize prevalence study conduct and reporting beyond antenatal settings are recommended. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06381-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8582208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85822082021-11-15 Gonorrhoea: a systematic review of prevalence reporting globally Whelan, Jane Abbing-Karahagopian, Victoria Serino, Laura Unemo, Magnus BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends periodic gonorrhoea prevalence assessments in the general population or proxies thereof (including pregnant women, women attending family planning clinics, military recruits, and men undergoing employment physicals for example) and in population groups at increased risk, including men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM) and sex workers. METHOD: We evaluated reported prevalence data, including estimates from proxy general population samples to reflect the WHO recommendations. We describe the outcomes from the general population country-by-country and extend previous reviews to include MSM, sex workers, and extragenital infections. RESULT AND CONCLUSION: In our systematic search, 2015 titles were reviewed (January 2010–April 2019) and 174 full-text publications were included. National, population-based prevalence data were identified in only four countries (the United States of America, the United Kingdom, Peru, New Caledonia) and local population-based estimates were reported in areas within five countries (China, South Africa, Brazil, Benin, and Malawi). The remaining studies identified only reported test positivity from non-probability, proxy general population samples. Due to the diversity of the reviewed studies, detailed comparison across studies was not possible. In MSM, data were identified from 64 studies in 25 countries. Rectal infection rates were generally higher than urogenital or pharyngeal infection rates, where extragenital testing was conducted. Data on sex workers were identified from 41 studies in 23 countries; rates in female sex workers were high. Current prevalence monitoring was shown to be highly suboptimal worldwide. Serial prevalence monitoring of critical epidemiological variables, and guidelines to optimize prevalence study conduct and reporting beyond antenatal settings are recommended. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-021-06381-4. BioMed Central 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8582208/ /pubmed/34763670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06381-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Whelan, Jane
Abbing-Karahagopian, Victoria
Serino, Laura
Unemo, Magnus
Gonorrhoea: a systematic review of prevalence reporting globally
title Gonorrhoea: a systematic review of prevalence reporting globally
title_full Gonorrhoea: a systematic review of prevalence reporting globally
title_fullStr Gonorrhoea: a systematic review of prevalence reporting globally
title_full_unstemmed Gonorrhoea: a systematic review of prevalence reporting globally
title_short Gonorrhoea: a systematic review of prevalence reporting globally
title_sort gonorrhoea: a systematic review of prevalence reporting globally
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34763670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06381-4
work_keys_str_mv AT whelanjane gonorrhoeaasystematicreviewofprevalencereportingglobally
AT abbingkarahagopianvictoria gonorrhoeaasystematicreviewofprevalencereportingglobally
AT serinolaura gonorrhoeaasystematicreviewofprevalencereportingglobally
AT unemomagnus gonorrhoeaasystematicreviewofprevalencereportingglobally