Cargando…
Two Faces of the Two-Phase Thermodynamic Model
[Image: see text] The quantum harmonic model and the two-phase thermodynamic method (2PT) are widely used to obtain quantum-corrected properties such as isobaric heat capacities or molar entropies. 2PT heat capacities were calculated inconsistently in the literature. For water, the classical heat ca...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34648287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00156 |
_version_ | 1784596946561794048 |
---|---|
author | Madarász, Ádám Hamza, Andrea Ferenc, Dávid Bakó, Imre |
author_facet | Madarász, Ádám Hamza, Andrea Ferenc, Dávid Bakó, Imre |
author_sort | Madarász, Ádám |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The quantum harmonic model and the two-phase thermodynamic method (2PT) are widely used to obtain quantum-corrected properties such as isobaric heat capacities or molar entropies. 2PT heat capacities were calculated inconsistently in the literature. For water, the classical heat capacity was also considered, but for organic liquids, it was omitted. We reanalyzed the performance of different quantum corrections on the heat capacities of common organic solvents against experimental data. We have pointed out serious flaws in previous 2PT studies. The vibrational density of states was calculated incorrectly causing a 39% relative error in diffusion coefficients and 45% error in the 2PT heat capacities. The wrong conversion of isobaric and isochoric heat capacities also caused about 40% error but in the other direction. We have introduced the concept of anharmonic correction (AC), which is simply the deviation of the classical heat capacity from that of the harmonic oscillator model. This anharmonic contribution is around +30 to 40 J/(mol K) for water depending on the water model and −8 to −10 J/(mol K) for hydrocarbons and halocarbons. AC is unrealistically large, +40 J/(K mol) for alcohols and amines, indicating some deficiency of the OPLS force field. The accuracy of the computations was also assessed with the determination of the self-diffusion coefficients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8582254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85822542021-11-12 Two Faces of the Two-Phase Thermodynamic Model Madarász, Ádám Hamza, Andrea Ferenc, Dávid Bakó, Imre J Chem Theory Comput [Image: see text] The quantum harmonic model and the two-phase thermodynamic method (2PT) are widely used to obtain quantum-corrected properties such as isobaric heat capacities or molar entropies. 2PT heat capacities were calculated inconsistently in the literature. For water, the classical heat capacity was also considered, but for organic liquids, it was omitted. We reanalyzed the performance of different quantum corrections on the heat capacities of common organic solvents against experimental data. We have pointed out serious flaws in previous 2PT studies. The vibrational density of states was calculated incorrectly causing a 39% relative error in diffusion coefficients and 45% error in the 2PT heat capacities. The wrong conversion of isobaric and isochoric heat capacities also caused about 40% error but in the other direction. We have introduced the concept of anharmonic correction (AC), which is simply the deviation of the classical heat capacity from that of the harmonic oscillator model. This anharmonic contribution is around +30 to 40 J/(mol K) for water depending on the water model and −8 to −10 J/(mol K) for hydrocarbons and halocarbons. AC is unrealistically large, +40 J/(K mol) for alcohols and amines, indicating some deficiency of the OPLS force field. The accuracy of the computations was also assessed with the determination of the self-diffusion coefficients. American Chemical Society 2021-10-14 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8582254/ /pubmed/34648287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00156 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Madarász, Ádám Hamza, Andrea Ferenc, Dávid Bakó, Imre Two Faces of the Two-Phase Thermodynamic Model |
title | Two Faces of the Two-Phase Thermodynamic Model |
title_full | Two Faces of the Two-Phase Thermodynamic Model |
title_fullStr | Two Faces of the Two-Phase Thermodynamic Model |
title_full_unstemmed | Two Faces of the Two-Phase Thermodynamic Model |
title_short | Two Faces of the Two-Phase Thermodynamic Model |
title_sort | two faces of the two-phase thermodynamic model |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34648287 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madaraszadam twofacesofthetwophasethermodynamicmodel AT hamzaandrea twofacesofthetwophasethermodynamicmodel AT ferencdavid twofacesofthetwophasethermodynamicmodel AT bakoimre twofacesofthetwophasethermodynamicmodel |