Cargando…
Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work
Disability employment programs play a key role in supporting people with disability to overcome barriers to finding and maintaining work. Despite significant investment, ongoing reforms to Australia’s Disability Employment Services (DES) are yet to lead to improved outcomes. This paper presents find...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111485 |
_version_ | 1784597033094479872 |
---|---|
author | Devine, Alexandra Shields, Marissa Dimov, Stefanie Dickinson, Helen Vaughan, Cathy Bentley, Rebecca LaMontagne, Anthony D. Kavanagh, Anne |
author_facet | Devine, Alexandra Shields, Marissa Dimov, Stefanie Dickinson, Helen Vaughan, Cathy Bentley, Rebecca LaMontagne, Anthony D. Kavanagh, Anne |
author_sort | Devine, Alexandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | Disability employment programs play a key role in supporting people with disability to overcome barriers to finding and maintaining work. Despite significant investment, ongoing reforms to Australia’s Disability Employment Services (DES) are yet to lead to improved outcomes. This paper presents findings from the Improving Disability Employment Study (IDES): a two-wave survey of 197 DES participants that aims to understand their perspectives on factors that influence access to paid work. Analysis of employment status by type of barrier indicates many respondents experience multiple barriers across vocational (lack of qualifications), non-vocational (inaccessible transport) and structural (limited availability of jobs, insufficient resourcing) domains. The odds of gaining work decreased as the number of barriers across all domains increased with each unit of barrier reported (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07, 1.38). Unemployed respondents wanted more support from employment programs to navigate the welfare system and suggest suitable work, whereas employed respondents wanted support to maintain work, indicating the need to better tailor service provision according to the needs of job-seekers. Combined with our findings from the participant perspective, improving understanding of these relationships through in-depth analysis and reporting of DES program data would provide better evidence to support current DES reform and improve models of service delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8582653 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85826532021-11-12 Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work Devine, Alexandra Shields, Marissa Dimov, Stefanie Dickinson, Helen Vaughan, Cathy Bentley, Rebecca LaMontagne, Anthony D. Kavanagh, Anne Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Disability employment programs play a key role in supporting people with disability to overcome barriers to finding and maintaining work. Despite significant investment, ongoing reforms to Australia’s Disability Employment Services (DES) are yet to lead to improved outcomes. This paper presents findings from the Improving Disability Employment Study (IDES): a two-wave survey of 197 DES participants that aims to understand their perspectives on factors that influence access to paid work. Analysis of employment status by type of barrier indicates many respondents experience multiple barriers across vocational (lack of qualifications), non-vocational (inaccessible transport) and structural (limited availability of jobs, insufficient resourcing) domains. The odds of gaining work decreased as the number of barriers across all domains increased with each unit of barrier reported (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07, 1.38). Unemployed respondents wanted more support from employment programs to navigate the welfare system and suggest suitable work, whereas employed respondents wanted support to maintain work, indicating the need to better tailor service provision according to the needs of job-seekers. Combined with our findings from the participant perspective, improving understanding of these relationships through in-depth analysis and reporting of DES program data would provide better evidence to support current DES reform and improve models of service delivery. MDPI 2021-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8582653/ /pubmed/34770000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111485 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Devine, Alexandra Shields, Marissa Dimov, Stefanie Dickinson, Helen Vaughan, Cathy Bentley, Rebecca LaMontagne, Anthony D. Kavanagh, Anne Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work |
title | Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work |
title_full | Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work |
title_fullStr | Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work |
title_full_unstemmed | Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work |
title_short | Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work |
title_sort | australia’s disability employment services program: participant perspectives on factors influencing access to work |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582653/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devinealexandra australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork AT shieldsmarissa australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork AT dimovstefanie australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork AT dickinsonhelen australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork AT vaughancathy australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork AT bentleyrebecca australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork AT lamontagneanthonyd australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork AT kavanaghanne australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork |