Cargando…

Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work

Disability employment programs play a key role in supporting people with disability to overcome barriers to finding and maintaining work. Despite significant investment, ongoing reforms to Australia’s Disability Employment Services (DES) are yet to lead to improved outcomes. This paper presents find...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devine, Alexandra, Shields, Marissa, Dimov, Stefanie, Dickinson, Helen, Vaughan, Cathy, Bentley, Rebecca, LaMontagne, Anthony D., Kavanagh, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770000
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111485
_version_ 1784597033094479872
author Devine, Alexandra
Shields, Marissa
Dimov, Stefanie
Dickinson, Helen
Vaughan, Cathy
Bentley, Rebecca
LaMontagne, Anthony D.
Kavanagh, Anne
author_facet Devine, Alexandra
Shields, Marissa
Dimov, Stefanie
Dickinson, Helen
Vaughan, Cathy
Bentley, Rebecca
LaMontagne, Anthony D.
Kavanagh, Anne
author_sort Devine, Alexandra
collection PubMed
description Disability employment programs play a key role in supporting people with disability to overcome barriers to finding and maintaining work. Despite significant investment, ongoing reforms to Australia’s Disability Employment Services (DES) are yet to lead to improved outcomes. This paper presents findings from the Improving Disability Employment Study (IDES): a two-wave survey of 197 DES participants that aims to understand their perspectives on factors that influence access to paid work. Analysis of employment status by type of barrier indicates many respondents experience multiple barriers across vocational (lack of qualifications), non-vocational (inaccessible transport) and structural (limited availability of jobs, insufficient resourcing) domains. The odds of gaining work decreased as the number of barriers across all domains increased with each unit of barrier reported (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07, 1.38). Unemployed respondents wanted more support from employment programs to navigate the welfare system and suggest suitable work, whereas employed respondents wanted support to maintain work, indicating the need to better tailor service provision according to the needs of job-seekers. Combined with our findings from the participant perspective, improving understanding of these relationships through in-depth analysis and reporting of DES program data would provide better evidence to support current DES reform and improve models of service delivery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8582653
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85826532021-11-12 Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work Devine, Alexandra Shields, Marissa Dimov, Stefanie Dickinson, Helen Vaughan, Cathy Bentley, Rebecca LaMontagne, Anthony D. Kavanagh, Anne Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Disability employment programs play a key role in supporting people with disability to overcome barriers to finding and maintaining work. Despite significant investment, ongoing reforms to Australia’s Disability Employment Services (DES) are yet to lead to improved outcomes. This paper presents findings from the Improving Disability Employment Study (IDES): a two-wave survey of 197 DES participants that aims to understand their perspectives on factors that influence access to paid work. Analysis of employment status by type of barrier indicates many respondents experience multiple barriers across vocational (lack of qualifications), non-vocational (inaccessible transport) and structural (limited availability of jobs, insufficient resourcing) domains. The odds of gaining work decreased as the number of barriers across all domains increased with each unit of barrier reported (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07, 1.38). Unemployed respondents wanted more support from employment programs to navigate the welfare system and suggest suitable work, whereas employed respondents wanted support to maintain work, indicating the need to better tailor service provision according to the needs of job-seekers. Combined with our findings from the participant perspective, improving understanding of these relationships through in-depth analysis and reporting of DES program data would provide better evidence to support current DES reform and improve models of service delivery. MDPI 2021-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8582653/ /pubmed/34770000 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111485 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Devine, Alexandra
Shields, Marissa
Dimov, Stefanie
Dickinson, Helen
Vaughan, Cathy
Bentley, Rebecca
LaMontagne, Anthony D.
Kavanagh, Anne
Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work
title Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work
title_full Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work
title_fullStr Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work
title_full_unstemmed Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work
title_short Australia’s Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work
title_sort australia’s disability employment services program: participant perspectives on factors influencing access to work
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582653/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34770000
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111485
work_keys_str_mv AT devinealexandra australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork
AT shieldsmarissa australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork
AT dimovstefanie australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork
AT dickinsonhelen australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork
AT vaughancathy australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork
AT bentleyrebecca australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork
AT lamontagneanthonyd australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork
AT kavanaghanne australiasdisabilityemploymentservicesprogramparticipantperspectivesonfactorsinfluencingaccesstowork