Cargando…

Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care

Restraint use in Australian residential aged care has been highlighted by the media, and investigated by researchers, government and advocacy bodies. In 2018, the Royal Commission into Aged Care selected ‘Restraint’ as a key focus of inquiry. Subsequently, Federal legislation was passed to ensure re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Breen, Juanita, Wimmer, Barbara C., Smit, Chloé C.H., Courtney-Pratt, Helen, Lawler, Katherine, Salmon, Katharine, Price, Andrea, Goldberg, Lynette R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769543
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111022
_version_ 1784597062624477184
author Breen, Juanita
Wimmer, Barbara C.
Smit, Chloé C.H.
Courtney-Pratt, Helen
Lawler, Katherine
Salmon, Katharine
Price, Andrea
Goldberg, Lynette R.
author_facet Breen, Juanita
Wimmer, Barbara C.
Smit, Chloé C.H.
Courtney-Pratt, Helen
Lawler, Katherine
Salmon, Katharine
Price, Andrea
Goldberg, Lynette R.
author_sort Breen, Juanita
collection PubMed
description Restraint use in Australian residential aged care has been highlighted by the media, and investigated by researchers, government and advocacy bodies. In 2018, the Royal Commission into Aged Care selected ‘Restraint’ as a key focus of inquiry. Subsequently, Federal legislation was passed to ensure restraint is only used in residential aged care services as the ‘last resort’. To inform and develop Government educational resources, we conducted qualitative research to gain greater understanding of the experiences and attitudes of aged care stakeholders around restraint practice. Semi-structured interviews were held with 28 participants, comprising nurses, care staff, physicians, physiotherapists, pharmacists and relatives. Two focus groups were also conducted to ascertain the views of residential and community aged care senior management staff. Data were thematically analyzed using a pragmatic approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Five themes were identified during the study: 1. Understanding of restraint; 2. Support for legislation; 3. Restraint-free environments are not possible; 4. Low-level restraint; 5. Restraint in the community is uncharted. Although most staff, health practitioners and relatives have a basic understanding of restraint, more education is needed at a conceptual level to enable them to identify and avoid restraint practice, particularly ‘low-level’ forms and chemical restraint. There was strong support for the new restraint regulations, but most interviewees admitted they were unsure what the legislation entailed. With regards to resources, stakeholders wanted recognition that there were times when restraint was necessary and advice on what to do in these situations, as opposed to unrealistic aspirations for restraint-free care. Stakeholders reported greater oversight of restraint in residential aged care but specified that community restraint use was largely unknown. Research is needed to investigate the extent and types of restraint practice in community aged care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8582776
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85827762021-11-12 Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care Breen, Juanita Wimmer, Barbara C. Smit, Chloé C.H. Courtney-Pratt, Helen Lawler, Katherine Salmon, Katharine Price, Andrea Goldberg, Lynette R. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Restraint use in Australian residential aged care has been highlighted by the media, and investigated by researchers, government and advocacy bodies. In 2018, the Royal Commission into Aged Care selected ‘Restraint’ as a key focus of inquiry. Subsequently, Federal legislation was passed to ensure restraint is only used in residential aged care services as the ‘last resort’. To inform and develop Government educational resources, we conducted qualitative research to gain greater understanding of the experiences and attitudes of aged care stakeholders around restraint practice. Semi-structured interviews were held with 28 participants, comprising nurses, care staff, physicians, physiotherapists, pharmacists and relatives. Two focus groups were also conducted to ascertain the views of residential and community aged care senior management staff. Data were thematically analyzed using a pragmatic approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Five themes were identified during the study: 1. Understanding of restraint; 2. Support for legislation; 3. Restraint-free environments are not possible; 4. Low-level restraint; 5. Restraint in the community is uncharted. Although most staff, health practitioners and relatives have a basic understanding of restraint, more education is needed at a conceptual level to enable them to identify and avoid restraint practice, particularly ‘low-level’ forms and chemical restraint. There was strong support for the new restraint regulations, but most interviewees admitted they were unsure what the legislation entailed. With regards to resources, stakeholders wanted recognition that there were times when restraint was necessary and advice on what to do in these situations, as opposed to unrealistic aspirations for restraint-free care. Stakeholders reported greater oversight of restraint in residential aged care but specified that community restraint use was largely unknown. Research is needed to investigate the extent and types of restraint practice in community aged care. MDPI 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8582776/ /pubmed/34769543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111022 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Breen, Juanita
Wimmer, Barbara C.
Smit, Chloé C.H.
Courtney-Pratt, Helen
Lawler, Katherine
Salmon, Katharine
Price, Andrea
Goldberg, Lynette R.
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care
title Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care
title_full Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care
title_fullStr Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care
title_full_unstemmed Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care
title_short Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care
title_sort interdisciplinary perspectives on restraint use in aged care
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582776/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769543
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111022
work_keys_str_mv AT breenjuanita interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare
AT wimmerbarbarac interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare
AT smitchloech interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare
AT courtneypratthelen interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare
AT lawlerkatherine interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare
AT salmonkatharine interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare
AT priceandrea interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare
AT goldberglynetter interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare