Cargando…
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care
Restraint use in Australian residential aged care has been highlighted by the media, and investigated by researchers, government and advocacy bodies. In 2018, the Royal Commission into Aged Care selected ‘Restraint’ as a key focus of inquiry. Subsequently, Federal legislation was passed to ensure re...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111022 |
_version_ | 1784597062624477184 |
---|---|
author | Breen, Juanita Wimmer, Barbara C. Smit, Chloé C.H. Courtney-Pratt, Helen Lawler, Katherine Salmon, Katharine Price, Andrea Goldberg, Lynette R. |
author_facet | Breen, Juanita Wimmer, Barbara C. Smit, Chloé C.H. Courtney-Pratt, Helen Lawler, Katherine Salmon, Katharine Price, Andrea Goldberg, Lynette R. |
author_sort | Breen, Juanita |
collection | PubMed |
description | Restraint use in Australian residential aged care has been highlighted by the media, and investigated by researchers, government and advocacy bodies. In 2018, the Royal Commission into Aged Care selected ‘Restraint’ as a key focus of inquiry. Subsequently, Federal legislation was passed to ensure restraint is only used in residential aged care services as the ‘last resort’. To inform and develop Government educational resources, we conducted qualitative research to gain greater understanding of the experiences and attitudes of aged care stakeholders around restraint practice. Semi-structured interviews were held with 28 participants, comprising nurses, care staff, physicians, physiotherapists, pharmacists and relatives. Two focus groups were also conducted to ascertain the views of residential and community aged care senior management staff. Data were thematically analyzed using a pragmatic approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Five themes were identified during the study: 1. Understanding of restraint; 2. Support for legislation; 3. Restraint-free environments are not possible; 4. Low-level restraint; 5. Restraint in the community is uncharted. Although most staff, health practitioners and relatives have a basic understanding of restraint, more education is needed at a conceptual level to enable them to identify and avoid restraint practice, particularly ‘low-level’ forms and chemical restraint. There was strong support for the new restraint regulations, but most interviewees admitted they were unsure what the legislation entailed. With regards to resources, stakeholders wanted recognition that there were times when restraint was necessary and advice on what to do in these situations, as opposed to unrealistic aspirations for restraint-free care. Stakeholders reported greater oversight of restraint in residential aged care but specified that community restraint use was largely unknown. Research is needed to investigate the extent and types of restraint practice in community aged care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8582776 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85827762021-11-12 Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care Breen, Juanita Wimmer, Barbara C. Smit, Chloé C.H. Courtney-Pratt, Helen Lawler, Katherine Salmon, Katharine Price, Andrea Goldberg, Lynette R. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Restraint use in Australian residential aged care has been highlighted by the media, and investigated by researchers, government and advocacy bodies. In 2018, the Royal Commission into Aged Care selected ‘Restraint’ as a key focus of inquiry. Subsequently, Federal legislation was passed to ensure restraint is only used in residential aged care services as the ‘last resort’. To inform and develop Government educational resources, we conducted qualitative research to gain greater understanding of the experiences and attitudes of aged care stakeholders around restraint practice. Semi-structured interviews were held with 28 participants, comprising nurses, care staff, physicians, physiotherapists, pharmacists and relatives. Two focus groups were also conducted to ascertain the views of residential and community aged care senior management staff. Data were thematically analyzed using a pragmatic approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Five themes were identified during the study: 1. Understanding of restraint; 2. Support for legislation; 3. Restraint-free environments are not possible; 4. Low-level restraint; 5. Restraint in the community is uncharted. Although most staff, health practitioners and relatives have a basic understanding of restraint, more education is needed at a conceptual level to enable them to identify and avoid restraint practice, particularly ‘low-level’ forms and chemical restraint. There was strong support for the new restraint regulations, but most interviewees admitted they were unsure what the legislation entailed. With regards to resources, stakeholders wanted recognition that there were times when restraint was necessary and advice on what to do in these situations, as opposed to unrealistic aspirations for restraint-free care. Stakeholders reported greater oversight of restraint in residential aged care but specified that community restraint use was largely unknown. Research is needed to investigate the extent and types of restraint practice in community aged care. MDPI 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8582776/ /pubmed/34769543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111022 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Breen, Juanita Wimmer, Barbara C. Smit, Chloé C.H. Courtney-Pratt, Helen Lawler, Katherine Salmon, Katharine Price, Andrea Goldberg, Lynette R. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care |
title | Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care |
title_full | Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care |
title_fullStr | Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care |
title_full_unstemmed | Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care |
title_short | Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Restraint Use in Aged Care |
title_sort | interdisciplinary perspectives on restraint use in aged care |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582776/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769543 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111022 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT breenjuanita interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare AT wimmerbarbarac interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare AT smitchloech interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare AT courtneypratthelen interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare AT lawlerkatherine interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare AT salmonkatharine interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare AT priceandrea interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare AT goldberglynetter interdisciplinaryperspectivesonrestraintuseinagedcare |