Cargando…

Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Orbital Prostheses

This systematic review was aimed at gathering technical and clinical applications of CAD/CAM technology for the preoperative planning of craniofacial implants placement, designing of molds and substructures and fabrication of orbital prostheses. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanveer, Waqas, Ridwan-Pramana, Angela, Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro, Forouzanfar, Tymour
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769865
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111349
_version_ 1784597074112675840
author Tanveer, Waqas
Ridwan-Pramana, Angela
Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro
Forouzanfar, Tymour
author_facet Tanveer, Waqas
Ridwan-Pramana, Angela
Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro
Forouzanfar, Tymour
author_sort Tanveer, Waqas
collection PubMed
description This systematic review was aimed at gathering technical and clinical applications of CAD/CAM technology for the preoperative planning of craniofacial implants placement, designing of molds and substructures and fabrication of orbital prostheses. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, an electronic search was executed. Human studies that utilized digital planning systems for the prosthetic rehabilitation of orbital defects were included. A total of 16 studies of 30 clinical cases, which were virtually planned through various digital planning and designing software, were included. The most common preoperative data required for digital planning were CT scans in 15 cases, the 3DSS-STD-II scanning system in 5 cases, an Artec Color 3D scanner in 3 cases and a NextEngine Desktop 3D laser scanner in 2 cases. Meanwhile, the digital designing software were Ease Orbital Implant Planning EOIPlan software in eight cases, Geomagic software in eight cases, Simplant software in four cases and Artec Studio 12 Professional in three cases. Surgical templates were fabricated for 12 cases to place 41 craniofacial implants in the orbital defect area. An image-guided surgical navigation system was utilized for the placement of five orbital implants in two cases. Digital designing and printing systems were reported for the preoperative planning of craniofacial implants placement, designing of molds and substructures and fabrication of orbital prostheses. The studies concluded that the digital planning, designing and fabrication of orbital prostheses reduce the clinical and laboratory times, reduces patient visits and provide a satisfactory outcome; however, technical skills and equipment costs are posing limitations on the use of these digital systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8582823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85828232021-11-12 Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Orbital Prostheses Tanveer, Waqas Ridwan-Pramana, Angela Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro Forouzanfar, Tymour Int J Environ Res Public Health Review This systematic review was aimed at gathering technical and clinical applications of CAD/CAM technology for the preoperative planning of craniofacial implants placement, designing of molds and substructures and fabrication of orbital prostheses. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, an electronic search was executed. Human studies that utilized digital planning systems for the prosthetic rehabilitation of orbital defects were included. A total of 16 studies of 30 clinical cases, which were virtually planned through various digital planning and designing software, were included. The most common preoperative data required for digital planning were CT scans in 15 cases, the 3DSS-STD-II scanning system in 5 cases, an Artec Color 3D scanner in 3 cases and a NextEngine Desktop 3D laser scanner in 2 cases. Meanwhile, the digital designing software were Ease Orbital Implant Planning EOIPlan software in eight cases, Geomagic software in eight cases, Simplant software in four cases and Artec Studio 12 Professional in three cases. Surgical templates were fabricated for 12 cases to place 41 craniofacial implants in the orbital defect area. An image-guided surgical navigation system was utilized for the placement of five orbital implants in two cases. Digital designing and printing systems were reported for the preoperative planning of craniofacial implants placement, designing of molds and substructures and fabrication of orbital prostheses. The studies concluded that the digital planning, designing and fabrication of orbital prostheses reduce the clinical and laboratory times, reduces patient visits and provide a satisfactory outcome; however, technical skills and equipment costs are posing limitations on the use of these digital systems. MDPI 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8582823/ /pubmed/34769865 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111349 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Tanveer, Waqas
Ridwan-Pramana, Angela
Molinero-Mourelle, Pedro
Forouzanfar, Tymour
Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Orbital Prostheses
title Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Orbital Prostheses
title_full Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Orbital Prostheses
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Orbital Prostheses
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Orbital Prostheses
title_short Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Orbital Prostheses
title_sort systematic review of clinical applications of cad/cam technology for craniofacial implants placement and manufacturing of orbital prostheses
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769865
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111349
work_keys_str_mv AT tanveerwaqas systematicreviewofclinicalapplicationsofcadcamtechnologyforcraniofacialimplantsplacementandmanufacturingoforbitalprostheses
AT ridwanpramanaangela systematicreviewofclinicalapplicationsofcadcamtechnologyforcraniofacialimplantsplacementandmanufacturingoforbitalprostheses
AT molineromourellepedro systematicreviewofclinicalapplicationsofcadcamtechnologyforcraniofacialimplantsplacementandmanufacturingoforbitalprostheses
AT forouzanfartymour systematicreviewofclinicalapplicationsofcadcamtechnologyforcraniofacialimplantsplacementandmanufacturingoforbitalprostheses