Cargando…

Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review

This study systematically reviewed the relationship between occupational risks and quality of life (QoL) and quality of work life (QWL) in hospitals. A systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guide, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Lira, Carlos Rodrigo Nascimento, Akutsu, Rita de Cássia, Costa, Priscila Ribas de Farias, Leite, Luana de Oliveira, da Silva, Karine Brito Beck, Botelho, Raquel B. A., Raposo, António, Han, Heesup, Ariza-Montes, Antonio, Araya-Castillo, Luis, Zandonadi, Renata Puppin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111434
_version_ 1784597101757333504
author de Lira, Carlos Rodrigo Nascimento
Akutsu, Rita de Cássia
Costa, Priscila Ribas de Farias
Leite, Luana de Oliveira
da Silva, Karine Brito Beck
Botelho, Raquel B. A.
Raposo, António
Han, Heesup
Ariza-Montes, Antonio
Araya-Castillo, Luis
Zandonadi, Renata Puppin
author_facet de Lira, Carlos Rodrigo Nascimento
Akutsu, Rita de Cássia
Costa, Priscila Ribas de Farias
Leite, Luana de Oliveira
da Silva, Karine Brito Beck
Botelho, Raquel B. A.
Raposo, António
Han, Heesup
Ariza-Montes, Antonio
Araya-Castillo, Luis
Zandonadi, Renata Puppin
author_sort de Lira, Carlos Rodrigo Nascimento
collection PubMed
description This study systematically reviewed the relationship between occupational risks and quality of life (QoL) and quality of work life (QWL) in hospitals. A systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guide, and the protocol was submitted on the PROSPERO website (CRD 2019127865). The last search was performed in June 2021 by two independent reviewers in the main databases, a gray literature database, and a manual search (LILACS, MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, Ovid). As eligibility criteria, we included observational studies, with adult hospital workers, with no restrictions on date and language, any type of instrument to assess QoL and QWL, any definition of QoL and QWL, and studies that presented the relationship between exposure and outcome. Newcastle–Ottawa was used to assess the methodological quality and RTI-Item Bank to assess the risk of bias. Given the impossibility of performing a meta-analysis, a qualitative synthesis was used to present the results. Thus, 11 studies met the criteria and were included in the review, with 6923 individuals aged 18 to 64 years. The studies were mainly carried out with health professionals (81.81%), women (63.60%), and in Asian countries (63.63%). All studies used different instruments and ways to categorize the QoL and QWL, and occupational risks. Only one study assessed occupational noise and another the ergonomic risk. All of them presented a relationship between occupational risk and quality of work life. They pointed to the need for measures to improve the lives of these professionals in the work environment. Therefore, studies show a relationship between occupational risks (noise, ergonomics, and stress) and workers’ perception of low or moderate quality of work life. However, more homogeneous studies are necessary for instruments, conceptualization, and categorization of quality of work life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8582940
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-85829402021-11-12 Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review de Lira, Carlos Rodrigo Nascimento Akutsu, Rita de Cássia Costa, Priscila Ribas de Farias Leite, Luana de Oliveira da Silva, Karine Brito Beck Botelho, Raquel B. A. Raposo, António Han, Heesup Ariza-Montes, Antonio Araya-Castillo, Luis Zandonadi, Renata Puppin Int J Environ Res Public Health Review This study systematically reviewed the relationship between occupational risks and quality of life (QoL) and quality of work life (QWL) in hospitals. A systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guide, and the protocol was submitted on the PROSPERO website (CRD 2019127865). The last search was performed in June 2021 by two independent reviewers in the main databases, a gray literature database, and a manual search (LILACS, MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, Ovid). As eligibility criteria, we included observational studies, with adult hospital workers, with no restrictions on date and language, any type of instrument to assess QoL and QWL, any definition of QoL and QWL, and studies that presented the relationship between exposure and outcome. Newcastle–Ottawa was used to assess the methodological quality and RTI-Item Bank to assess the risk of bias. Given the impossibility of performing a meta-analysis, a qualitative synthesis was used to present the results. Thus, 11 studies met the criteria and were included in the review, with 6923 individuals aged 18 to 64 years. The studies were mainly carried out with health professionals (81.81%), women (63.60%), and in Asian countries (63.63%). All studies used different instruments and ways to categorize the QoL and QWL, and occupational risks. Only one study assessed occupational noise and another the ergonomic risk. All of them presented a relationship between occupational risk and quality of work life. They pointed to the need for measures to improve the lives of these professionals in the work environment. Therefore, studies show a relationship between occupational risks (noise, ergonomics, and stress) and workers’ perception of low or moderate quality of work life. However, more homogeneous studies are necessary for instruments, conceptualization, and categorization of quality of work life. MDPI 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8582940/ /pubmed/34769950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111434 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
de Lira, Carlos Rodrigo Nascimento
Akutsu, Rita de Cássia
Costa, Priscila Ribas de Farias
Leite, Luana de Oliveira
da Silva, Karine Brito Beck
Botelho, Raquel B. A.
Raposo, António
Han, Heesup
Ariza-Montes, Antonio
Araya-Castillo, Luis
Zandonadi, Renata Puppin
Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review
title Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review
title_full Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review
title_short Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review
title_sort occupational risks in hospitals, quality of life, and quality of work life: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582940/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769950
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111434
work_keys_str_mv AT deliracarlosrodrigonascimento occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview
AT akutsuritadecassia occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview
AT costapriscilaribasdefarias occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview
AT leiteluanadeoliveira occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview
AT dasilvakarinebritobeck occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview
AT botelhoraquelba occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview
AT raposoantonio occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview
AT hanheesup occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview
AT arizamontesantonio occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview
AT arayacastilloluis occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview
AT zandonadirenatapuppin occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview