Cargando…
Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review
This study systematically reviewed the relationship between occupational risks and quality of life (QoL) and quality of work life (QWL) in hospitals. A systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guide, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111434 |
_version_ | 1784597101757333504 |
---|---|
author | de Lira, Carlos Rodrigo Nascimento Akutsu, Rita de Cássia Costa, Priscila Ribas de Farias Leite, Luana de Oliveira da Silva, Karine Brito Beck Botelho, Raquel B. A. Raposo, António Han, Heesup Ariza-Montes, Antonio Araya-Castillo, Luis Zandonadi, Renata Puppin |
author_facet | de Lira, Carlos Rodrigo Nascimento Akutsu, Rita de Cássia Costa, Priscila Ribas de Farias Leite, Luana de Oliveira da Silva, Karine Brito Beck Botelho, Raquel B. A. Raposo, António Han, Heesup Ariza-Montes, Antonio Araya-Castillo, Luis Zandonadi, Renata Puppin |
author_sort | de Lira, Carlos Rodrigo Nascimento |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study systematically reviewed the relationship between occupational risks and quality of life (QoL) and quality of work life (QWL) in hospitals. A systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guide, and the protocol was submitted on the PROSPERO website (CRD 2019127865). The last search was performed in June 2021 by two independent reviewers in the main databases, a gray literature database, and a manual search (LILACS, MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, Ovid). As eligibility criteria, we included observational studies, with adult hospital workers, with no restrictions on date and language, any type of instrument to assess QoL and QWL, any definition of QoL and QWL, and studies that presented the relationship between exposure and outcome. Newcastle–Ottawa was used to assess the methodological quality and RTI-Item Bank to assess the risk of bias. Given the impossibility of performing a meta-analysis, a qualitative synthesis was used to present the results. Thus, 11 studies met the criteria and were included in the review, with 6923 individuals aged 18 to 64 years. The studies were mainly carried out with health professionals (81.81%), women (63.60%), and in Asian countries (63.63%). All studies used different instruments and ways to categorize the QoL and QWL, and occupational risks. Only one study assessed occupational noise and another the ergonomic risk. All of them presented a relationship between occupational risk and quality of work life. They pointed to the need for measures to improve the lives of these professionals in the work environment. Therefore, studies show a relationship between occupational risks (noise, ergonomics, and stress) and workers’ perception of low or moderate quality of work life. However, more homogeneous studies are necessary for instruments, conceptualization, and categorization of quality of work life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8582940 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-85829402021-11-12 Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review de Lira, Carlos Rodrigo Nascimento Akutsu, Rita de Cássia Costa, Priscila Ribas de Farias Leite, Luana de Oliveira da Silva, Karine Brito Beck Botelho, Raquel B. A. Raposo, António Han, Heesup Ariza-Montes, Antonio Araya-Castillo, Luis Zandonadi, Renata Puppin Int J Environ Res Public Health Review This study systematically reviewed the relationship between occupational risks and quality of life (QoL) and quality of work life (QWL) in hospitals. A systematic review was performed according to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guide, and the protocol was submitted on the PROSPERO website (CRD 2019127865). The last search was performed in June 2021 by two independent reviewers in the main databases, a gray literature database, and a manual search (LILACS, MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations, Ovid). As eligibility criteria, we included observational studies, with adult hospital workers, with no restrictions on date and language, any type of instrument to assess QoL and QWL, any definition of QoL and QWL, and studies that presented the relationship between exposure and outcome. Newcastle–Ottawa was used to assess the methodological quality and RTI-Item Bank to assess the risk of bias. Given the impossibility of performing a meta-analysis, a qualitative synthesis was used to present the results. Thus, 11 studies met the criteria and were included in the review, with 6923 individuals aged 18 to 64 years. The studies were mainly carried out with health professionals (81.81%), women (63.60%), and in Asian countries (63.63%). All studies used different instruments and ways to categorize the QoL and QWL, and occupational risks. Only one study assessed occupational noise and another the ergonomic risk. All of them presented a relationship between occupational risk and quality of work life. They pointed to the need for measures to improve the lives of these professionals in the work environment. Therefore, studies show a relationship between occupational risks (noise, ergonomics, and stress) and workers’ perception of low or moderate quality of work life. However, more homogeneous studies are necessary for instruments, conceptualization, and categorization of quality of work life. MDPI 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8582940/ /pubmed/34769950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111434 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review de Lira, Carlos Rodrigo Nascimento Akutsu, Rita de Cássia Costa, Priscila Ribas de Farias Leite, Luana de Oliveira da Silva, Karine Brito Beck Botelho, Raquel B. A. Raposo, António Han, Heesup Ariza-Montes, Antonio Araya-Castillo, Luis Zandonadi, Renata Puppin Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review |
title | Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Occupational Risks in Hospitals, Quality of Life, and Quality of Work Life: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | occupational risks in hospitals, quality of life, and quality of work life: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8582940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34769950 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deliracarlosrodrigonascimento occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview AT akutsuritadecassia occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview AT costapriscilaribasdefarias occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview AT leiteluanadeoliveira occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview AT dasilvakarinebritobeck occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview AT botelhoraquelba occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview AT raposoantonio occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview AT hanheesup occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview AT arizamontesantonio occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview AT arayacastilloluis occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview AT zandonadirenatapuppin occupationalrisksinhospitalsqualityoflifeandqualityofworklifeasystematicreview |